MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 127

Thread: Quad Core Round Up: AMD Vs Intel Clock to Clock(deneb vs agena + deneb vs intel)

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Haslett, MI
    Posts
    2,221
    Quote Originally Posted by leoy View Post
    Put some 2.4+ at deneb's nothbridge and u will see how far behind is the phenom II...(i've seen 920 phenom II @ 2.6 easily...)

    I'm pretty sure every intel guy would do this in his kentsfield/yorkfield when he would overclock....(if they had one )

    So i'm pretty sure phenom II has some aces in his sleeve....
    We have the fsb, and look what it does!!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Untitled.jpg 
Views:	401 
Size:	190.7 KB 
ID:	92177  

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    170
    U are already high on fsb at 3.7 to 4 .
    Phenom II can go to 3.7 -4 and tweak tha nb at whatever speed u want.
    @ 2.6nb and some ddr3 maybe we will have nice numbers. Here we aren't just overclockers we tweak everything.
    Yorkfield's everything is just fsb which u already tweak...

    @64bit windows phenom II kick ass too mate u aren't even informed.
    Cpu:Phenom ΙΙ 965 c3 @ 4.1Ghz/2.8nb (air cooled)
    Mobo: Asus M3a79-T Deluxe
    Ram:A-data 2x2 800+ @ 1000
    Gpu:Asus Hd4850 512mb @ 700/1050(sycthe Musashi)
    Hdd:500gb Seagate 7200.11
    Psu:Corsair Hx620
    Cooling: TRue(dual fan)
    Case: Coolermaster Haf 932...

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Haslett, MI
    Posts
    2,221
    Quote Originally Posted by leoy View Post
    U are already high on fsb at 3.7 to 4 .
    Phenom II can go to 3.7 -4 and tweak tha nb at whatever speed u want.
    @ 2.6nb and some ddr3 maybe we will have nice numbers. Here we aren't just overclockers we tweak everything.
    Yorkfield's everything is just fsb which u already tweak...

    @64bit windows phenom II kick ass too mate u aren't even informed.
    Maybe you're dense; all the same, chew on this:
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	cinebench32gf7.jpg 
Views:	390 
Size:	135.5 KB 
ID:	92179   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Untitled.jpg 
Views:	391 
Size:	190.7 KB 
ID:	92180  

  4. #4
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    746
    Well to be fair for that comparison to be chew worthy you'd need to lower the phenom's clock but raise tits northbridge, htt and hypertransport clocks.

    Also likely the memory because I havnt seen any with good mhz and timings.

    Edit: under closer inspection 1gb 800mhz memory vs. 8gb 1000mhz memory...

    Edit 2: sorry was gonna say 400/500 at first then changed it.
    Last edited by Caveman787; 01-04-2009 at 02:00 PM.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lubbock, Texas
    Posts
    2,133
    Quote Originally Posted by Caveman787 View Post
    Well to be fair for that comparison to be chew worthy you'd need to lower the phenom's clock but raise tits northbridge, htt and hypertransport clocks.

    Also likely the memory because I havnt seen any with good mhz and timings.

    Edit: under closer inspection 1gb 400mhz memory vs. 8gb 1000mhz memory...
    yes its a completely horrible comparison since how i have seen many more. it seems hes just picking the best yorkfield he can find and then find the worst phenom II benchmark out with the absolute worst settings. and the phenom has 800 mhz ram not 400.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Haslett, MI
    Posts
    2,221
    Quote Originally Posted by roofsniper View Post
    yes its a completely horrible comparison since how i have seen many more. it seems hes just picking the best yorkfield he can find and then find the worst phenom II benchmark out with the absolute worst settings. and the phenom has 800 mhz ram not 400.
    You of all people are just uninformed, and I've chosen to ignore your posts, but let me say this: just scroll up and jou'll notice somebody used this same screenshot as proof that PII benches at 3.7Ghz should have been faster.

    Why don't you guys do this: get your PIIs and beat that!!

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lubbock, Texas
    Posts
    2,133
    Quote Originally Posted by Zucker2k View Post
    You of all people are just uninformed, and I've chosen to ignore your posts, but let me say this: just scroll up and jou'll notice somebody used this same screenshot as proof that PII benches at 3.7Ghz should have been faster.

    Why don't you guys do this: get your PIIs and beat that!!
    i really don't understand how you can call any of us uninformed. i know more than you do about the topic and personally you don't even seem to care as long as you can find certain benchmarks and try to prove that phenom sucks.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Haslett, MI
    Posts
    2,221
    Quote Originally Posted by Caveman787 View Post
    Well to be fair for that comparison to be chew worthy you'd need to lower the phenom's clock but raise tits northbridge, htt and hypertransport clocks.

    Also likely the memory because I havnt seen any with good mhz and timings.

    Edit: under closer inspection 1gb 400mhz memory vs. 8gb 1000mhz memory...
    Sigh! Please point us to the evidence that more ram helps cinebench. If anything, my NB is being tasked with such high fsb and 8Gbs. This is my everyday system and this is currently the hardware config. that's all. Of course, you guys can consider this a target when you get your PIIs. All you hear is excuses, DDR3, Expensive, Hot, etc.

    This is a Q9550 with 8GB of cheap DDR2 ram at DDR2 990Mhz with loose timings.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by Zucker2k View Post
    Sigh! Please point us to the evidence that more ram helps cinebench. If anything, my NB is being tasked with such high fsb and 8Gbs. This is my everyday system and this is currently the hardware config. that's all. Of course, you guys can consider this a target when you get your PIIs. All you hear is excuses, DDR3, Expensive, Hot, etc.

    This is a Q9550 with 8GB of cheap DDR2 ram at DDR2 990Mhz with loose timings.
    phenom is weird with memory and Nb settings some chips will run high on both other run high one one and low on the other.

    as for the memory being loose it's really that lose it's like set for a rate 1000mhz-1100mhz speed (with various volts). tight timings doesn't benefit phenom at all from what I've seen). The IMC on the chip can be picky about how much volts you use too.
    HAVE NO FEAR!
    "AMD fallen angel"
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamekiller View Post
    You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.

  10. #10
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    170
    @ zucker2k
    All i see is that i am right again.

    Score of yorkfield @3.7 @ hwbox : 14602 (with 411 fsb )
    http://www.hwbox.gr/showthread.php?t=3253&garpg=12

    Wanna put the nb little higher too???
    Unless yorkfield also wins 2000 points when going 64bit
    Last edited by leoy; 01-04-2009 at 06:55 PM.
    Cpu:Phenom ΙΙ 965 c3 @ 4.1Ghz/2.8nb (air cooled)
    Mobo: Asus M3a79-T Deluxe
    Ram:A-data 2x2 800+ @ 1000
    Gpu:Asus Hd4850 512mb @ 700/1050(sycthe Musashi)
    Hdd:500gb Seagate 7200.11
    Psu:Corsair Hx620
    Cooling: TRue(dual fan)
    Case: Coolermaster Haf 932...

  11. #11
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    510
    Quote Originally Posted by leoy View Post
    @ zucker2k
    Wanna put the nb little higher too???
    Unless yorkfield also wins 2000 points when going 64bit
    Yorkfield gains about 1600 points:
    http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...px?i=3184&p=12

  12. #12
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    State of Confusion, USA
    Posts
    2,513
    Quote Originally Posted by leoy View Post
    @ zucker2k
    All i see is that i am right again.

    Score of yorkfield @3.7 @ hwbox : 14602 (with 411 fsb )
    http://www.hwbox.gr/showthread.php?t=3253&garpg=12

    Wanna put the nb little higher too???
    Unless yorkfield also wins 2000 points when going 64bit
    leoy: I couldn't agree with you more...
    Ever since the 1st word of PhII's potential has come out Zucker2k has done everything in his power to discredit the improvements make in K10.5.... Call anyone who speaks well of the improvements blind fanboi's etc...

    When he posted his CB10 results from his Yorkie, I was not that impressed.

    Thanks for the PhII results... Here is a ss of my tweaked 9950 and even it gives his beloved Intel a run for it's money.



    BTW: His Q9950 run was on a 64bit OS.....
    Last edited by Daveburt714; 01-04-2009 at 07:18 PM.
    AMD FX-8350 (1237 PGN) | Asus Crosshair V Formula (bios 1703) | G.Skill 2133 CL9 @ 2230 9-11-10 | Sapphire HD 6870 | Samsung 830 128Gb SSD / 2 WD 1Tb Black SATA3 storage | Corsair TX750 PSU
    Watercooled ST 120.3 & TC 120.1 / MCP35X XSPC Top / Apogee HD Block | WIN7 64 Bit HP | Corsair 800D Obsidian Case








    First Computer: Commodore Vic 20 (circa 1981).

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Haslett, MI
    Posts
    2,221
    Quote Originally Posted by leoy View Post
    @ zucker2k
    All i see is that i am right again.

    Score of yorkfield @3.7 @ hwbox : 14602 (with 411 fsb )
    http://www.hwbox.gr/showthread.php?t=3253&garpg=12

    Wanna put the nb little higher too???
    Unless yorkfield also wins 2000 points when going 64bit
    No, you're wrong again. Hopefully you and a few others in this thread are learning something new everyday....

    That's almost 1Ghz advantage to PHII with virtually the same score. Don't bring PHII to a cinebench party.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	cine64.jpg 
Views:	246 
Size:	182.8 KB 
ID:	92234  

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •