U are already high on fsb at 3.7 to 4 .
Phenom II can go to 3.7 -4 and tweak tha nb at whatever speed u want.
@ 2.6nb and some ddr3 maybe we will have nice numbers. Here we aren't just overclockers we tweak everything.
Yorkfield's everything is just fsb which u already tweak...
@64bit windows phenom II kick ass too mate u aren't even informed.
Cpu:Phenom ΙΙ 965 c3 @ 4.1Ghz/2.8nb (air cooled)
Mobo: Asus M3a79-T Deluxe
Ram:A-data 2x2 800+ @ 1000
Gpu:Asus Hd4850 512mb @ 700/1050(sycthe Musashi)
Hdd:500gb Seagate 7200.11
Psu:Corsair Hx620
Cooling: TRue(dual fan)
Case: Coolermaster Haf 932...
Well to be fair for that comparison to be chew worthy you'd need to lower the phenom's clock but raise tits northbridge, htt and hypertransport clocks.
Also likely the memory because I havnt seen any with good mhz and timings.
Edit: under closer inspection 1gb 800mhz memory vs. 8gb 1000mhz memory...
Edit 2: sorry was gonna say 400/500 at first then changed it.
Last edited by Caveman787; 01-04-2009 at 02:00 PM.
You of all people are just uninformed, and I've chosen to ignore your posts, but let me say this: just scroll up and jou'll notice somebody used this same screenshot as proof that PII benches at 3.7Ghz should have been faster.
Why don't you guys do this: get your PIIs and beat that!!
Sigh! Please point us to the evidence that more ram helps cinebench. If anything, my NB is being tasked with such high fsb and 8Gbs. This is my everyday system and this is currently the hardware config. that's all. Of course, you guys can consider this a target when you get your PIIs. All you hear is excuses, DDR3, Expensive, Hot, etc.
This is a Q9550 with 8GB of cheap DDR2 ram at DDR2 990Mhz with loose timings.
phenom is weird with memory and Nb settings some chips will run high on both other run high one one and low on the other.
as for the memory being loose it's really that lose it's like set for a rate 1000mhz-1100mhz speed (with various volts). tight timings doesn't benefit phenom at all from what I've seen). The IMC on the chip can be picky about how much volts you use too.
@ zucker2k
All i see is that i am right again.
Score of yorkfield @3.7 @ hwbox : 14602 (with 411 fsb )
http://www.hwbox.gr/showthread.php?t=3253&garpg=12
Wanna put the nb little higher too???
Unless yorkfield also wins 2000 points when going 64bit![]()
Last edited by leoy; 01-04-2009 at 06:55 PM.
Cpu:Phenom ΙΙ 965 c3 @ 4.1Ghz/2.8nb (air cooled)
Mobo: Asus M3a79-T Deluxe
Ram:A-data 2x2 800+ @ 1000
Gpu:Asus Hd4850 512mb @ 700/1050(sycthe Musashi)
Hdd:500gb Seagate 7200.11
Psu:Corsair Hx620
Cooling: TRue(dual fan)
Case: Coolermaster Haf 932...
Yorkfield gains about 1600 points:
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...px?i=3184&p=12
leoy: I couldn't agree with you more...
Ever since the 1st word of PhII's potential has come out Zucker2k has done everything in his power to discredit the improvements make in K10.5.... Call anyone who speaks well of the improvements blind fanboi's etc...
When he posted his CB10 results from his Yorkie, I was not that impressed.
Thanks for the PhII results... Here is a ss of my tweaked 9950 and even it gives his beloved Intel a run for it's money.
BTW: His Q9950 run was on a 64bit OS.....
Last edited by Daveburt714; 01-04-2009 at 07:18 PM.
AMD FX-8350 (1237 PGN) | Asus Crosshair V Formula (bios 1703) | G.Skill 2133 CL9 @ 2230 9-11-10 | Sapphire HD 6870 | Samsung 830 128Gb SSD / 2 WD 1Tb Black SATA3 storage | Corsair TX750 PSU
Watercooled ST 120.3 & TC 120.1 / MCP35X XSPC Top / Apogee HD Block | WIN7 64 Bit HP | Corsair 800D Obsidian Case
First Computer: Commodore Vic 20 (circa 1981).
Bookmarks