Results 1 to 25 of 349

Thread: AMD Phenom II 920 & 940 Full Review [UPDATED with more tests]

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtremely Kool
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,875
    Quote Originally Posted by BenchZowner View Post
    Charts explanation:

    Agena = Phenom I
    Deneb = Phenom II
    Both processors clocked at 3GHz and compared with each other to show the differences between these two.

    Deneb = Phenom II
    Kentsfield = Core 2 Quad ( 65nm ) [ Q6600 ]
    Yorkfield = Core 2 Quad 9 ( 45nm ) [ Q9450 ]
    Bloomfield = Core i7
    All of them clocked at 3.7GHz for a clock per clock comparison.

    I'm having trouble finding what's wrong with this comparison to you.
    I think he maybe thinking that there is something wrong with the graph because the assumption is that Deneb will be faster/equal to but never slower than Agena.
    Last edited by Final8ty; 01-04-2009 at 04:11 AM.

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    33
    I think the most interesting part of the clock2clock review is the power consumption.

    AMD looks pretty bad there...

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Munich, DE
    Posts
    1,401
    Quote Originally Posted by loutsos View Post
    I think the most interesting part of the clock2clock review is the power consumption.

    AMD looks pretty bad there...
    Ask for details befor you complain please.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •