Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 35 of 35

Thread: i940 results

  1. #26
    /dev/zero
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Germany, Berlin
    Posts
    3,625
    Excellent results... the 940 is really an alternative to the XE concerning max clocks under top air or water cooling.
    Xtremesystems.org
    i7-4820K * ryba 2-stager + 1-stager * EVGA X79 Dark * 32G Team Xtreem 2666C11 * EVGA GTX 680 SC Sig. * Intel G2 80G * Corsair HX1000 * Lian Li PC-70B * Watercool Heatkiller, EK Fullcover/Backplate for GTX, MCP355 Dual Setup@Koolance RP-402X2, PA120.3+Alphacool 360, Tubing 16/10.


  2. #27
    Xtreme XIP
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    1,559
    Great going revogamer , keep pushing it bro

  3. #28
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Northland, New Zealand
    Posts
    731
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	9.203.JPG 
Views:	820 
Size:	195.2 KB 
ID:	89099  



  4. #29
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Leicester UK
    Posts
    29
    First of all id like to say good job with the overclock very impressed, and second I got my 940 today but waiting for the evga x58 mobo, just wondering what batch number your chip is, and is there somwhere i can find what numbers are doing what, the last 2 chips ive bought the qx9650 and the e8600 have been poor batches im hoping this one is gonna be different.
    Last edited by R3APER; 11-18-2008 at 02:43 PM.

  5. #30
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Paris
    Posts
    35
    thanks for sharing.

    does the i940 can be easily stable on air with a TRUE and good case @4000MHz (i mean few hours) ?

    do i have more chance to reach this frequency than with a i920 ?

  6. #31
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    185
    My i7-920 and GA-EX58 are on itīs way and I am going for 200x20 with my Noctua NH-U12F, 24/7. If it gets to hot I think 3800MHz would be pretty good anyways...
    This is not enought.

  7. #32
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    322
    Very nice good work. Did you have HT enabled?

  8. #33
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    185
    Quote Originally Posted by kill_a_wat View Post
    Very nice good work. Did you have HT enabled?
    - Whatīs the advance of not have HT enable?
    This is not enought.

  9. #34
    3D Team Captain Don_Dan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Munich, Germany
    Posts
    4,199
    Quote Originally Posted by Computerville View Post
    - Whatīs the advance of not have HT enable?
    Operating systems can't recognize which core is a "real" one and which one is a "virtual" one, it just sees eight cores. So if two work-intensive threads are assigned to two cores, it can happen that it's a real core plus a virtual one running off the same real core, so in this case it's actually slower than with four cores when every thread is assigned to a real core.

    Quote Originally Posted by chew* View Post
    You can never have enough D9's.

  10. #35
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Somewhere in EU
    Posts
    573
    What cooler you use? :P
    Corsair Obsidian 650D - EVGA P67 FTW - Samsung F3 1Tb - 8Gb A-Data cheapest crap DDR3 - Intel Core i5 2500K w/ Corsair H50 - EVGA GTX 295 co-op - Corsair AX650

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •