Page 4 of 14 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 349

Thread: AMD Phenom II 920 & 940 Full Review [UPDATED with more tests]

  1. #76
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Originally Posted by OverClocker_gr
    maybe,but i dont want to see again 939 - > AM2
    Quote Originally Posted by Glow9 View Post
    I hope you mean with AM3 cause I'm the same way I was POed big time. But if you mean AM2 I'd say its done after these chips. Ugrade path for current users. I'm curious what AM3 can bring but so far its just PII w/ ddr3.
    No, I think he means an upgrade that really wasn't much of an upgrade at all. AM2 was mostly a compatibility change over from Sc-939 DDR1 to DDR2 more or less. Upgrade paths are moot, IMHO, I think AM3 will make sticking with AM2+ or etc.. a poor decision. AM3 will perform better since PhII might need more bandwidth.
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  2. #77
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    London
    Posts
    577
    940 seems to be even with the Q9550, exclude the x32 cinebench score and take the x64 score...

    not too bad, in that case AM3 should close the clock for clock gap a bit more...right now its performing equal to a 170mhz slower york

    heres hoping for cheaper quads from both camps
    i7 920@4.34 | Rampage II GENE | 6GB OCZ Reaper 1866 | 8800GT (zzz) | Corsair AX750 | Xonar Essence ST w/ 3x LME49720 | HiFiMAN EF2 Amplifier | Shure SRH840 | EK Supreme HF | Thermochill PA 120.3 | MCP355 | XSPC Reservoir | 3/8" ID Tubing

    Phenom 9950BE @ 3400/2000 (CPU/NB) | Gigabyte MA790GP-DS4H | HD4850 | 4GB Corsair DHX @850 | Corsair TX650W | T.R.U.E Push-Pull

    E2160 @3.06 | ASUS P5K-Pro | BFG 8800GT | 4GB G.Skill @ 1040 | 600W Tt PP

    A64 3000+ @2.87 | DFI-NF4 | 7800 GTX | Patriot 1GB DDR @610 | 550W FSP

  3. #78
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    741
    Quote Originally Posted by Donnie27 View Post
    No, I think he means an upgrade that really wasn't much of an upgrade at all. AM2 was mostly a compatibility change over from Sc-939 DDR1 to DDR2 more or less. Upgrade paths are moot, IMHO, I think AM3 will make sticking with AM2+ or etc.. a poor decision. AM3 will perform better since PhII might need more bandwidth.
    Poor décision? AM3 cpus are functionnal on AM2+ motherboard so why it's a poor décision? If you want to stick with DDR2 you can for a long time. If you want to go to DDR3 it's like on Intel platform, you change your mobo!
    AMD Phenom II X2 550@Phenom II X4 B50
    MSI 890GXM-G65
    Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2x2GB
    Sapphire HD 6950 2GB

  4. #79
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    741
    Quote Originally Posted by LightSpeed View Post
    940 seems to be even with the Q9550, exclude the x32 cinebench score and take the x64 score...

    not too bad, in that case AM3 should close the clock for clock gap a bit more...right now its performing equal to a 170mhz slower york

    heres hoping for cheaper quads from both camps
    Interesting thingsis that, PII 920 undercut Q9400 in term of price and same for PII 940 with Q9550. That match the stock peformance perfectly.
    AMD Phenom II X2 550@Phenom II X4 B50
    MSI 890GXM-G65
    Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2x2GB
    Sapphire HD 6950 2GB

  5. #80
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,476
    Quote Originally Posted by AbelJemka View Post
    Interesting thingsis that, PII 920 undercut Q9400 in term of price and same for PII 940 with Q9550. That match the stock peformance perfectly.
    Thats why I'm ordering one haha, I said if it was even equal to a Q9450 and cost less I would. I've been itching for a Quad for a long time
    i3 2100, MSI H61M-E33. 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws.
    MSI GTX 460 Twin Frozr II. 1TB Caviar Blue.
    Corsair HX 620, CM 690, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit.

  6. #81
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by AbelJemka View Post
    Poor décision? AM3 cpus are functionnal on AM2+ motherboard so why it's a poor décision? If you want to stick with DDR2 you can for a long time. If you want to go to DDR3 it's like on Intel platform, you change your mobo!
    AM3 and DDR3 should add more performance than AM2/+ boards. Yes, you will have to change your motherboard on the AMD system as well. Upgrade path becomes almost moot. Sure you can settle for a little less performance and stick with the old stuff. IF that's case, why bother upgrading at all?

    Quote Originally Posted by AbelJemka View Post
    Interesting thingsis that, PII 920 undercut Q9400 in term of price and same for PII 940 with Q9550. That match the stock peformance perfectly.
    Match performance?
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  7. #82
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    425
    Quote Originally Posted by OverClocker_gr View Post
    maybe your answer is on your first line.
    yes but what i don't understand is when the GPU is the botleneck, usualy every FPS is almost the same cpu by cpu (as for other high res tests in you review) but in this particular game i7 are even between each other and 10 to 15% back from other CPUs.

    any idea on what could cause this ?
    Core i7 2700k@4,8ghz HT off- 1.41v / Gainward GTX580 GooD 850/1700/2200 / 2X4Gb G.Skill Ares 1833C9 / Z77 Sabertooth / Crucial M4 64 Gb / WD 320Gb and 640GB / Corsair H80 / Corsair 620 HX

  8. #83
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601
    Thx for your review OverClocker_gr

    Waiting for IPC comparison

  9. #84
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,785
    Amazing to see AMD losing in the Cinebench to Q9550 and Q9450... Apparently the real competition is still the LGA775 chips and not nehalem.
    Current: AMD Threadripper 1950X @ 4.2GHz / EK Supremacy/ 360 EK Rad, EK-DBAY D5 PWM, 32GB G.Skill 3000MHz DDR4, AMD Vega 64 Wave, Samsung nVME SSDs
    Prior Build: Core i7 7700K @ 4.9GHz / Apogee XT/120.2 Magicool rad, 16GB G.Skill 3000MHz DDR4, AMD Saphire rx580 8GB, Samsung 850 Pro SSD

    Intel 4.5GHz LinX Stable Club

    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team

  10. #85
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Athens ~ Greece
    Posts
    119
    Quote Originally Posted by Vinas View Post
    Amazing to see AMD losing in the Cinebench to Q9550 and Q9450... Apparently the real competition is still the LGA775 chips and not nehalem.
    What do you mean amazing? They are marketed, priced and positioned against 775 chips, of course. Nehalem is a complete platform upgrade, AMD will have a more direct competitor for it when AM3 DDR3 boards and chips are out.

  11. #86
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Mesa, AZ
    Posts
    74
    Quote Originally Posted by herderien View Post
    yes but what i don't understand is when the GPU is the botleneck, usualy every FPS is almost the same cpu by cpu (as for other high res tests in you review) but in this particular game i7 are even between each other and 10 to 15% back from other CPUs.

    any idea on what could cause this ?
    It is because hyper threading is being used with the core i7 which hampers the performance of that particular game.

    Here is a link that shows a performance boost when hyper threading is turned off.

    http://techreport.com/articles.x/15818/6

  12. #87
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    741
    Quote Originally Posted by Donnie27 View Post
    AM3 and DDR3 should add more performance than AM2/+ boards. Yes, you will have to change your motherboard on the AMD system as well. Upgrade path becomes almost moot. Sure you can settle for a little less performance and stick with the old stuff. IF that's case, why bother upgrading at all?
    Same reasoning aout socket 775 so! What performance DDR3 brings? So what can we do? Stick on DDR2!
    AMD Phenom II X2 550@Phenom II X4 B50
    MSI 890GXM-G65
    Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2x2GB
    Sapphire HD 6950 2GB

  13. #88
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    393
    What's the release date on PII? I want to order one but I can't seem to find it anywhere.

    edit: Never mind on the release date, so far it looks good, not quite the Q9550 but it would be awesome chip to overclock and play around with.
    Last edited by Clairvoyant129; 12-30-2008 at 09:22 AM.

  14. #89
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Strive for peace w/Acts of War
    Posts
    868
    Quote Originally Posted by AbelJemka View Post
    Same reasoning aout socket 775 so! What performance DDR3 brings? So what can we do? Stick on DDR2!
    Ah! Ever heard of Tripple Channel with 1336? "THAT" is what DDR3 is for. Just like PCIE 2.0, you can implement it on every board but not every video card is 2.0.
    ASUS P5B Deluxe P965 BIOS 1236 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 G0 8MBL2 @ 3.15GHZ | G.Skill DDR2 800 F2-6400PHU2-2GBHZ & XTreem DDR 800 D9GMH - 4GB RAM Total | 4:5 Ratio @ 350fsbx9 | Tuniq Tower 120 | BFG GeForce 9800GTX | Seagate 2x 250GB Perpendicular HDDs RAID-0 | PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750W EPS12V | Samsung TOC T240 24" LCD Monitor |

  15. #90
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    New Orleans
    Posts
    496
    Quote Originally Posted by Clairvoyant129 View Post
    What's the release date on PII? I want to order one but I can't seem to find it anywhere.

    edit: Never mind on the release date, so far it looks good, not quite the Q9550 but it would be awesome chip to overclock and play around with.
    Thats because the release date is Jan 8, 2009. I don't know where the hell these people are getting prices from because I can't find prices anywhere.

  16. #91
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    741
    Quote Originally Posted by Nasgul View Post
    Ah! Ever heard of Tripple Channel with 1336? "THAT" is what DDR3 is for. Just like PCIE 2.0, you can implement it on every board but not every video card is 2.0.
    I speak and most speak about 775 not 1336. i7 is in another league

    Quote Originally Posted by moiraesfate View Post
    Thats because the release date is Jan 8, 2009. I don't know where the hell these people are getting prices from because I can't find prices anywhere.
    Search in AMD section, there is a lots of links.
    AMD Phenom II X2 550@Phenom II X4 B50
    MSI 890GXM-G65
    Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2x2GB
    Sapphire HD 6950 2GB

  17. #92
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,084
    4% more performance with AM3

    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    And AMD is only a CPU manufactor due to stolen technology and making clones.

  18. #93
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by AbelJemka View Post
    Same reasoning aout socket 775 so! What performance DDR3 brings? So what can we do? Stick on DDR2!
    Actually NO! DDR3 did give more room for overclocking since it can run at higher speeds. 775 processors don't have to depend on unlock multipliers.
    Phenom II will need more bandwidth coming and going to and from the cores. So yes DDR3 will help. Also note that DDR2 is about about dead as DDR1 was when Intel moved to it as well. The economies are the only thing slowing down adoption of DDR3 as it stands right now.

    Note, if BOTH DDR3 and HT 3.0 doesn't help when they are Both tested together, AMD is in for a very rough ride indeed.
    Last edited by Donnie27; 12-30-2008 at 11:17 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  19. #94
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by Donnie27 View Post
    Actually NO! DDR3 did give more room for overclocking since it can run at higher speeds. 775 processors don't have to depend on unlock multipliers.
    Phenom II will need more bandwidth coming and going to and from the cores. So yes DDR3 will help. Also note that DDR2 is about about dead as DDR1 was when Intel moved to it as well. The economies are the only thing slowing down adoption of DDR3 as it stands right now.

    Note, if BOTH DDR3 and HT 3.0 doesn't help when they are Both tested together, AMD is in for a very rough ride indeed.
    Hyper transport 3.1 (3200mhz)

    HT 3.0 is already implemented on board just. the chips don't full support it's max speed t stock. (2600mhz) chip speed Hyper transport is 1600-2000hz
    HAVE NO FEAR!
    "AMD fallen angel"
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamekiller View Post
    You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.

  20. #95
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    746
    Donnie I don't get your thinking you still need high or unlocked multiplier because the chips can only go so high on fsb/ht clock. So I don't see how ddr3 really helped overclocking.

  21. #96
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    germany-münster
    Posts
    375
    phenom 2 consumes only 50w @ 2.6ghz

    http://www.hardware-infos.com/news.php?news=2620

    massive consumption increase with +0.1v and 1ghz, but we've seen that already (and 120w isnt that much for 3,65ghz)
    system:

    Phenom II 920 3.5Ghz @ 1.4v, benchstable @ over 3,6Ghz (didnt test higher)
    xigmatek achilles
    sapphire hd4870 1gb @ 820 1020
    Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H
    8gb a-data 4-4-4-12 800
    x-fi xtrememusic
    rip 2x 160gb maxtor(now that adds up to 4...)
    320gb/250gb/500gb samsung

  22. #97
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    746
    From what some testing phenom II's have shown us it might not even need any voltage increase to reach 3.6.

  23. #98
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    33
    Quote Originally Posted by v_rr View Post
    4% more performance with AM3

    Am I the only one thinking that AM3 is a bad idea?
    I mean, if I was going the DDR3 way (plus CPU, plus DDR3-supporing mobo), I'd probably get the cheapest i7

  24. #99
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by loutsos View Post
    Am I the only one thinking that AM3 is a bad idea?
    I mean, if I was going the DDR3 way (plus CPU, plus DDR3-supporing mobo), I'd probably get the cheapest i7
    am2+ chis are support to be able to go in to am3. I think Am3 chip will have high ram speed support.
    HAVE NO FEAR!
    "AMD fallen angel"
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamekiller View Post
    You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.

  25. #100
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    746
    Apparantly ht 3.1 is up to 3200mhz and 3.0 is only up to 2600 mhz.

    Am3 will have ht 3.1, so there may be more performance increase there.

Page 4 of 14 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •