AMD Phenom II X550BE @ X4 3.8Ghz | Asus Crosshair V Formula | Gskill F3-16000CL9-8GBRM | 2 X Saphire 4850 in Crossfire | Asus Xonar D2x | Corsair HX750 | Silverstone Raven rv-01
Something about coldbug with Phenom II 940 on cascade ->
HTT 270 bootable
HTT 280 easly to bench
NB and HT freq. 2250MHz - easly to bench
Evap temp ~-115*C, for me it's good score![]()
C2D E8400 E0 @ 4GHz : DFI LANParty X48 UT T3R : Mushkin Black Ascent 2x1GB DDR3 : BFG GTX260 : Corsair HX520W
RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W
RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU
SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
XBONE paired with 55''Samsung LED 3D TV
thank you![]()
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
With HT set to 1.0 how high can the Frequency go without hitting cold bug?
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Ahh, the day after Christmas. When peoples hearts are full of joy and human kindness..
Well, I thought they were till I came here and saw the old Lets bash X and inflame the guys..
Ok, took my shovel and cleaned out the garbage and then did a little sweeping to clean it up.
Gentlemen, be friends will ya?
Man, can't ya just sit back and say lets see what this new beast from AMD will really do in mortal hands?
And then this troll bringing up ancient history about Intel as if the Universe would have changed had they been lilly white and angelic in their business practices.. JEEZ..
If your so riled up that you can't come here without fighting maybe it's time to go release some of that testosterone in another way.
No, I'm not going to say what I'm thinking but for Christ's sake literally, relax a bit will ya?
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
The XS WCG team needs your support.
A good project with good goals.
Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.
I did 220htt with -160 °C ht 2.0 1320 MHZ for all benches and found out (somehow) settings short afterwards with dice -60°C core idle 250htt boot - I think HTT will raise sooner or later for the results. Testing with multi is just so easy for initial, short testing and you tend to leave out htt for a secondbut 300 HTT has already been reached with Destroyer on Air and I don't think -195° will pull it down to 200...
| '12 IvyBridge - "ticks different"... | AwardFabrik IvyBridge round I by SoF | AwardFabrik IvyBridge round II by angoholic & stummerwinter
| '11 The SandyBridge madness... | AwardFabrik / Team LDK OC-Season 2011/2012 Opening Event
| '10 Gulftown LaunchDay OC round up @ASUS RIIE | 3DM05 2x GPU WR LIVE @Cebit 2010 @ASUS MIIIE | SandyBridge arrived @ASUS P8P67
| '09 Foxconn Avenger | E8600 | Foxconn A79A-S | Phenom II 940 BE | LaunchDay Phenom II OC round up
| '08 7.438s 1m LN2 | AMD 1m WR LN2 | 2nd AOCM | Phenom II teasing
| '07 100% E2140 | 106.5% E2160 | 100% E4500 | 103% E4400 | 5508 MHZ E6850 | 7250 MHZ P4 641 126.5% by SoF and AwardFabrik Crew all on Gigabyte DS3P c? and LN2...
| '06 3800+ X2 Manchester 0531TPEW noHS 3201MHZ c? | 3200+ Venice noHS 3279MHZ c? | Opteron 148 0536CABYE 3405MHZ c? all on Gigabyte K8NXP-SLI compressorcooled
| '05 3500+[NC], 3000+[W], 2x 3200+[W], 3500+[NC], 3200+[V] 0516GPDW
Originally Posted by saaya
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Wrote this in another thread
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=285
Sample calculation for total fps, just to show (very simplified):
Resolution = 800x600
C2Q: 10 seconds 30 fps, 60 seconds 50 fps, 30 seconds 100 fps = (10x30 + 60x50 + 30x100) / 100 = 63 FPS
Phenom: 10 seconds 40 fps, 60 seconds 50 fps, 30 seconds 70 fps = (10x30 + 60x50 + 30x100) / 100 = 54 FPS
Resolution = 1920x1200 (video card cuts frames on 50 fps and lowers the rest some)
C2Q: 10 seconds 25 fps, 60 seconds 40 fps, 30 seconds 50 fps = (10x25 + 60x40 + 30x50) / 100 = 41 FPS
Phenom: 10 seconds 35 fps, 60 seconds 40 fps, 30 seconds 50 fps = (10x35 + 60x40 + 30x50) / 100 = 42 FPS
Allways we have some dividers, but way to calculate memory freq. is different on old X2 and Phenoms.
What you are doing in this forum if you don't see different betwen HT and HTT?
I know that you are from usa, but think about you read here, is not that hard.
C2D E8400 E0 @ 4GHz : DFI LANParty X48 UT T3R : Mushkin Black Ascent 2x1GB DDR3 : BFG GTX260 : Corsair HX520W
Last edited by G0ldBr1ck; 12-26-2008 at 10:27 PM.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Phenoms have 2 freqs. one for NB (what i belive that is memory controller, which is said to have to be either equal or higher than the HT freq, on my phenom 9850 it is 10 by default (2000 mhz) and so is HT Link.
any1 who have a phenom can easyly see it in memory section, NB speed, and you got the normal HT link.
Does the NB freq matter at all ?this is though for memory i reccon, but that is what I!! belive, so theese are no facts except what the standard frequencies are. ( what i mean is, does the NB freq make the chip coldbug at all, or is to just to leave it at standard. is this whats been done on all sessions. i already know 1000 mhz HT link means that many chips can go down to almost 190- on LN2 but well, they have never ever mentioned the NB freq.
SOF, tested that at all ?
And yeah true, phenoms have dividers for memorypitty i cannot run lower than CL4 on 1066 mhz.
Memspeed = ref HT / mem divider
NB speed = ref HT * NB Multi
CPU speed = ref HT * CPU Multi
HT speed = ref HT * HT multi
HT multi must be less or equal with the NB multi.
The on die memory controller and the L3 cache run at NB speed.
HT speed is most interesting in dual/multi socket systems because the chips are connented via HT.
On single socket systems it may have an minimal impact on games. On boards with sideport memory this memory is connected via HT also if I understood macci correct.
i think sometimes people get confused and say it. i know i do sometimes. maybe they are thinking of hyper transport terminal. idk
and yes nb/ht speeds do matter. you can see there are some pics around here with people messing around with the nb speeds and theres a big difference.
Bookmarks