Phenom X4 II 940 in my hand ...

[OBR]

I have some new toy again, i am not under NDA with AMD ... you can post wishes for benchmarks ...

My usual bench setup software:



If you have special request, post here ... I WILL NOT publish results public, but thru PMs. If someone form AMD will ask me for closing this thread, will be deleted. I dont want any problems ... but i am not officilay under NDA.

[demonkevy666]

why 2.6ghz ? phenom II 920/940 are both suppose to be 2.8ghz and3.0ghz ?

Lacking Nb speed 200mhz = any from 0.4%and up to 3% ....

[OBR]

why 2.6ghz ? phenom II 920/940 are both suppose to be 2.8ghz and3.0ghz ?

Lacking Nb speed 200mhz = any from 0.4%and up to 3% ....

My usual bench setup software: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Rammsteiner]

Oh, nice

I'd like to see some games really. But doing that entire list is fine as well, gives a certain idea what to expext

[Raiderman]

That is P-I

[demonkevy666]

4 GHZ resoult by Phenom II NB 2.6Ghz
LOSER CPU, too slow in all benchmark.
better than Agena and Kentsfield but Penryn is the winner yet.

penryn has 12mbs cache too many of those benches like cache

go try some MAYA rendering, and Hd encoding.

[demonkevy666]

CAZZI SUOI
YES but deneb have a control memory

that only matter to memory bandwidth. cache is much faster the main memory

[coolice]

4 GHZ resoult by Phenom II NB 2.6Ghz
LOSER CPU, too slow in all benchmark.
better than Agena and Kentsfield but Penryn is the winner yet.

may i know y my screenshots has pchs.it watermark?

[Raiderman]

get em coolice!!

[Raiderman]

slapping a watermark over someones watermarked screenshot is not cool!

[justapost]

Hmm vew more memory details would be nice. Maybe rightmark multi cpu. I assume your timeframe does not allow installing ubuntu 8.10 and run the phoronix-test-suites universe serie.

You bench on vista 64bit?

[Monkey101]

+1 for some game benchmarks, maybe some of the newer games, also maybe supreme commander . How well does it OC on air with reasonable volts for a 24/7 setup?

[chew*]

4 GHZ resoult by Phenom II NB 2.6Ghz
LOSER CPU, too slow in all benchmark.
better than Agena and Kentsfield but Penryn is the winner yet.

Well this is useless..........just an fyi here's my own personal 2gig ddr2 800 ram versus 4 gigs ddr2 800 ram run , Jeez I can find all kinds of things wrong here, 2 gigs with only 5-5-5-15......even my corsair vanilla xms can do 4-4-4-12 with only 2 slots used......It's obvious this is not an optimized setup......

592 mb ram for a 3d06 bench.........that seems wrong, ganged......try unganged. On a side note it's still 1500 point lead over my highest to date with 3.2g q6600/4870 with same asus clocks bios. Curious what clock would make them even.

1000 pts difference anyone?

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=8958751
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=8967323

[StefanHamminga]

Hi OBR, can you do a comparison between the Core i7 920 and the Phenom II 940 as they seem to be priced very similar over here (here is The Netherlands)?

I'm especially interested in Cinebench xCPU x64, PovRay xCPU, 3DSMax x64 and Visual Studio x64.

[Raiderman]

Wow, Stefan....been here two years and your first post?? AMD bring you out?
Welcome!!!

[kiwik]

I second the game bench request. Try Supreme Commander Forged Alliance, it's pretty hard on the CPU. If you can grab one of the crazy FFA replays on GameReplays, you wouldn't need to play the game, simply record the FPS and the Simulation Time vs Real Time.

[leoy]

is in PC mark 2GB or 4GB different ?
ok but it's only PC mark, in 3d bench no.


in vantage only 1750pt at 4Ghz ? Intel at 3.6Ghz do 1900pt
in 3d mark only 5800/5900pt ? intel over 6200/6300pt
and aquamark ? too slow
and cinebench ????? BIGGEST LOSER !!!!! and it's a monolitic die, but loser.


Intel penryn is the winner yet.

STFU! LEave the forum....
Sooorry for the bad expression...

[chew*]

is in PC mark 2GB or 4GB different ?
ok but it's only PC mark, in 3d bench no.


in vantage only 1750pt at 4Ghz ? Intel at 3.6Ghz do 1900pt
in 3d mark only 5800/5900pt ? intel over 6200/6300pt
and aquamark ? too slow
and cinebench ????? BIGGEST LOSER !!!!! and it's a monolitic die, but loser.

Intel penryn is the winner yet.

That was a mistake, I clipped the wrong benchmark. meant to clip 3d06 and only look close at how much ram was used........I might add i have little faith in synthetic tests. I want to see actual games benchmarks against platforms.

[Earzz]

Wow, Stefan....been here two years and your first post?? AMD bring you out?
Welcome!!!

Lol, welcome Stefan.

[annton]

Game benchmark like crysis under multi-gpu.

PII & i7 @4G using tri-sli gtx280 will be great.

[StefanHamminga]

Wow, Stefan....been here two years and your first post?? AMD bring you out?
Welcome!!!

LOL, nah, I created the account in 2006, but since that time I've not been doing much with overclocking PCs, recently I've 'rediscovered' the forum

[Zucker2k]

Game benchmark like crysis under multi-gpu.

PII & i7 @4G using tri-sli gtx280 will be great.

I want to see this too, should be representative of high-end gaming.

[Glow9]

I'm curious about actual pricing. Since it's like bam! good upgrade for everyone heres a cpl chips them wham! AM3.

[roofsniper]

bold statement to call something a loser cpu on a system that isn't even optimized at all and compare it to a ddr3 system which is fully optimized. if you notice the ram in those benchmarks is complete crap. my ram on stock settings is better than that. the cpu isn't tweaked at all along with the nb and everything. the only difference between the pics you posted and a stock phenom II is that the cpu multiplier is hiked up a bit to just overclock the core. i think you need to have a better understanding of things before posting a crappy system and the assuming based on benchmarks that aren't even official that the product is going to be a "loser cpu". i could same the same for i7 and actually be able to explain it but i am not going to go there.

[artissco]

is in PC mark 2GB or 4GB different ?
ok but it's only PC mark, in 3d bench no.


in vantage only 1750pt at 4Ghz ? Intel at 3.6Ghz do 1900pt
in 3d mark only 5800/5900pt ? intel over 6200/6300pt
and aquamark ? too slow
and cinebench ????? BIGGEST LOSER !!!!! and it's a monolitic die, but loser.


Intel penryn is the winner yet.

who cares... we need some game tests... and amd in games always get some good numbers

time will come and we get new mobos with proper support and better numbers in tests