MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 1265

Thread: AMD Shanghai/Deneb Review Thread

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    920 @3.8Ghz

    Great find AbelJemka

    @Caveman787

    Rated FSB has almost zero influence on performance with K10.Maybe in some extreme case of triple SLI or CF,but even then i think it wouldn't be a bottleneck.What's important is the northbridge/L3 clock speed since it can be higher than HyperTransoprt(and not vice versa).If Deneb can work stable with @2.5-2.6Ghz NB clocks and 4Ghz for core clocks,it will be one tough nugget to crack .

  2. #2
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    746
    Well thanks for informing me off that informal

    Didn't notice that till I typed it.

    Also I was under the impression that high hypertranport link combined with high nb speed helped increase performance a big deal.

    Why the need for 2000 ht if it's not so important then?

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    153
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    Rated FSB has almost zero influence on performance with K10.Maybe in some extreme case of triple SLI or CF,but even then i think it wouldn't be a bottleneck.What's important is the northbridge/L3 clock speed since it can be higher than HyperTransoprt(and not vice versa).If Deneb can work stable with @2.5-2.6Ghz NB clocks and 4Ghz for core clocks,it will be one tough nugget to crack .
    I am embarrased to say I did not know this! Thanks informal !!
    Phenom 9950BE (125w) 3.2 ghz| ASUS M3A79-T Deluxe | 4 Gig Corsair XMS2 (DDR2 800 Mhz) | NV 8800 GTS 512 (G92) | SATA2: 2-SGTE 350; 2-WD 250 | SeaSonic M12 SS-700HM| Apogee GTZ; MCP355; Feser 240 | Creative X-Fi Xtremegamer | VISTA 32-bit |

  4. #4
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Northeast Ohio, Where the weather changes every 30 min...
    Posts
    598
    If we can get around 2.6ghz nb on air I'm going to go out on a limb and say we should be able to get 3ghz with cold, but the cpu clocks will be very modest if we hit that fast. Ht link does need to be dropped at higher htt frequencies, but I've never noticed any gain beyond dropping to 6x with current phenoms. The 9850 I put under cold did 275 htt with a 10x multi on everything, but the cpu clocked better but wouldn't do nearly that much htt on air.
    Not much to say right now.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    211
    Look what THG brought in We Overclock Phenom II to 4.9GHz plus result (SuperPi)

    Last edited by Ghostbuster; 12-15-2008 at 11:14 PM.

  6. #6
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    State of Confusion, USA
    Posts
    2,513
    Cod... I hate SuperPi as a benchmark in the Intel vs Amd wars!

    I remember all the P4 guys bragging over SPi results against my 3800 X2 back in the day, even though that was one of the few benches they could actually win....

    That being said, it's nice to see the PhII break the 1M run at under 18 seconds (and to see some real numbers)!

    If you'll notice there are a few problems with that SS:

    1) Actual clock is only 4.02 Ghz
    2) Voltage is Rediculously high for what we've seen from 4Ghz PhII's
    3) Memory is set at 800 NOT 1066
    4) IMC/NB is running @ 1800Mhz

    I'm sure all the Intel fanboys will see this SPi score as a weakness of the PhII, while I see it as very positive. In the right hands, on AIR, I could see this score being sub 16s... We'll see where real world stuff goes from there!
    AMD FX-8350 (1237 PGN) | Asus Crosshair V Formula (bios 1703) | G.Skill 2133 CL9 @ 2230 9-11-10 | Sapphire HD 6870 | Samsung 830 128Gb SSD / 2 WD 1Tb Black SATA3 storage | Corsair TX750 PSU
    Watercooled ST 120.3 & TC 120.1 / MCP35X XSPC Top / Apogee HD Block | WIN7 64 Bit HP | Corsair 800D Obsidian Case








    First Computer: Commodore Vic 20 (circa 1981).

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Croatia
    Posts
    29
    Quote Originally Posted by Daveburt714 View Post
    Cod... I hate SuperPi as a benchmark in the Intel vs Amd wars!
    Intel has advantage in SuperPi regarding architectural differencies.
    Bigger problem is that Super Pi is single threaded app, it shows almoust nothing about perormance of multicore CPU.

    sapienti sat

  8. #8
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    741
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghostbuster View Post
    Look what THG brought in We Overclock Phenom II to 4.9GHz plus result (SuperPi)

    |quote]To verify that the processor was stable at 4.9 GHz, we conducted some tests and it completed a SuperPi 1M run in 17,769 sec.[/quote]
    Screenshot is 4GHz...
    Moreover 17.769s 4G Phenom II
    Best Phenom I score 19.92s at 3.9GHz with one core overclocked and memory at 558MHz cas 4...
    http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1665
    AMD Phenom II X2 550@Phenom II X4 B50
    MSI 890GXM-G65
    Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2x2GB
    Sapphire HD 6950 2GB

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    North Augusta, SC USA
    Posts
    448
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghostbuster View Post
    Look what THG brought in We Overclock Phenom II to 4.9GHz plus result (SuperPi)

    Wow, talk about not RESPECTING NDA!!! I thought the lift wasn't until Friday. I hope AMD takes them off their Elite list and never send then products to review again. Hardcore folks don't visit Toms anyway.

  10. #10
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    498
    AMD Phenom II X4 940 (3GHz) outperforms Intel QX9770 (3.2GHz) in 3Dmark Vantage; lost 9% to core i7

    In 3Dmark Vantage, the Phenom II X4 940 (Deneb) running on ASRock AOD790GX/128M with 2GB DDR2-1066 scored P7240. On a core i7 system, the same HD 4850 scored P7766 while on a Intel P45 board ASRock P45XE-WiFiN with QX9770, it scored 7112. Looks like the Phenom II X4 940 (3GHz) is able to outperform the QX9770 in this test whereas Intel Core i7 still outperform the Phenom II X4 3GHz by over 9%.
    http://my.ocworkbench.com/bbs/showth...597#post441597
    Faceman


  11. #11
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Birmingham AL.
    Posts
    1,079
    Quote Originally Posted by lo squartatore View Post
    FAKE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    the sample Deneb C0 was +10% to Agena in Crysis and +8% in Quake wars in clock to clock, with bios and RAM lower.
    The ultimate platform must be highter and is not possible that it's better to2-3%, IT's FAKE !


    QX9770 vs Deneb 940 better ?
    FAKE is not possible.
    damn your obnoxious we will know the truth real soon. that wont be the last we hear of that comparison
    Last edited by G0ldBr1ck; 12-16-2008 at 12:43 PM.

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    70
    Quote Originally Posted by lo squartatore View Post
    FAKE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    the sample Deneb C0 was +10% to Agena in Crysis and +8% in Quake wars in clock to clock, with bios and RAM lower.
    The ultimate platform must be highter and is not possible that it's better to2-3%, IT's FAKE !


    QX9770 vs Deneb 940 better ?
    FAKE is not possible.
    Yanno, I normally have patience for people who are trying to learn or speak another language. I remember the awakening I got when getting off an airplane in Prague and seeing words in Cyrillic and thinking, "We're not in Kansas anymore." But your post didn't make a bit of sense to me, and your propensity towards "shouting" those non-sensical posts is somewhat irritating.
    Thuban 1090 @ stock
    Windows 7 Ultimate
    Asus M4A78T-E
    8GB OCZ Reaper HPC DDR2 1066mhz RAM
    6970 Video Card
    2T Hitachi Deskstar Drives
    (sheepish look) ASUS Physx Board

  13. #13
    Xtremely Bad Overclocker
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    East Blue
    Posts
    3,596
    Quote Originally Posted by Throwed View Post
    Wow, talk about not RESPECTING NDA!!! I thought the lift wasn't until Friday. I hope AMD takes them off their Elite list and never send then products to review again. Hardcore folks don't visit Toms anyway.
    QFT! that sucks really - I want to show my screen so that everybody can see that they are nubs...I can do half a second better at same speed
    additionally - they use LN2 and 1.7V for that?????? jeez' 1.55V and air is all you need for that
    Quote Originally Posted by hipro5
    hahaha I do it all on air
    exactly!!! (this is an old comment of our greek friend I will never forget... )
    Last edited by SoF; 12-16-2008 at 01:00 PM.
    | '12 IvyBridge - "ticks different"... | AwardFabrik IvyBridge round I by SoF | AwardFabrik IvyBridge round II by angoholic & stummerwinter
    | '11 The SandyBridge madness... | AwardFabrik / Team LDK OC-Season 2011/2012 Opening Event
    | '10 Gulftown LaunchDay OC round up @ASUS RIIE | 3DM05 2x GPU WR LIVE @Cebit 2010 @ASUS MIIIE | SandyBridge arrived @ASUS P8P67

    | '09 Foxconn Avenger | E8600 | Foxconn A79A-S | Phenom II 940 BE | LaunchDay Phenom II OC round up
    | '08 7.438s 1m LN2 | AMD 1m WR LN2 | 2nd AOCM | Phenom II teasing
    | '07 100% E2140 | 106.5% E2160 | 100% E4500 | 103% E4400 | 5508 MHZ E6850 | 7250 MHZ P4 641 126.5% by SoF and AwardFabrik Crew all on Gigabyte DS3P c? and LN2...
    | '06 3800+ X2 Manchester 0531TPEW noHS 3201MHZ c? | 3200+ Venice noHS 3279MHZ c? | Opteron 148 0536CABYE 3405MHZ c? all on Gigabyte K8NXP-SLI compressorcooled

    | '05 3500+[NC], 3000+[W], 2x 3200+[W], 3500+[NC], 3200+[V] 0516GPDW

    Quote Originally Posted by saaya
    sof pulled a fermi on all of us !!!

  14. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    North Augusta, SC USA
    Posts
    448
    Quote Originally Posted by SoF View Post
    QFT! that sucks really - I want to show my screen so that everybody can see that they are nubs...I can do half a second better at same speed
    additionally - they use LN2 and 1.7V for that?????? jeez' 1.55V and air is all you need for that
    Well, in three days you can show everyone here at XS how much of a joke Tomshardware is. Hell, many already know this though. Glad to see you respecting the NDA. I am sure it has been difficult with so much attention the Denebs are drawing.



    For all the obvious Intel folk trying to defend Intel in a AMD thread/section........
    RELAX!!!! Forget the speculation!! Friday, there should be a slew of trusted reviews out.

  15. #15
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Space
    Posts
    769
    Quote Originally Posted by SoF View Post
    QFT! that sucks really - I want to show my screen so that everybody can see that they are nubs...I can do half a second better at same speed
    additionally - they use LN2 and 1.7V for that?????? jeez' 1.55V and air is all you need for that

    exactly!!! (this is an old comment of our greek friend I will never forget... )

    Firday?

  16. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    96
    Quote Originally Posted by lo squartatore View Post
    THG
    the best S H I T site all over the world, his dipendents can't OC , and it's PRO intel
    IMBESIL !!!!
    +1 and also add ANANDTECH TO THE LIST PLEASE, they all suck INTEL'S BALLS
    AMD Phenom II X550BE @ X4 3.8Ghz | Asus Crosshair V Formula | Gskill F3-16000CL9-8GBRM | 2 X Saphire 4850 in Crossfire | Asus Xonar D2x | Corsair HX750 | Silverstone Raven rv-01

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •