I would have expected 2400 on deneb
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
So what happened to 5% performance advantage is a no biggie?Anyway, there are cheap intel boards too.
welcome back from the rock you just crawled from; PII is NOT a competitor to Nehalem. Repeat; PII is NOT a competitor to Nehalem. What does this mean? It means if one owns a decent Intel board, they could upgrade to any number of E8xxx series or C2Q Q9xxx series processors. I mean, it's not science; if PII proves to annihilate everything in its path then you'll see people like me jumping ship, but so far, the part can't even beat a similarly clocked penryn. And penryns are drop-in chips for most Intel-platform-would-be upgraders. Sigh. I really needed that. Stop talking about $1K upgrades it just shows you haven't really been following what's going on.
Last edited by Zucker2k; 12-08-2008 at 04:07 PM.
i agree as well
the ONLY thing i am not sure about is how well retail chips will OC on LN2 and if AMD has a massive lead on LN2 (say 1GHz) will that be enough to compete on multithreaded benchmarks still
guess we'll find out in January the full story
The thing is even if PIIs can overclock to 6Ghz or even 6.2ghz benchable, under ln2, they'd still be beaten by Intel parts. If we can see 7Ghz benchablePIIs, then things will get exciting. The reason why the dust has already settled is that we have a good idea what the PIIs are capable of at stock; it is not too good a picture, considering that a lower clocked Q9550 fares very well against them. That's ALL we need to know; stock numbers. It's the reason why they're priced below the Q9550. Ln2 is for the pros; and how many are there? So it'll appear to me that the performance line has already been drawn.
Last edited by Zucker2k; 12-08-2008 at 04:26 PM.
AMD didn't release anything.There are some "leaked" slides.But without proper(that's an odd word) review(spi and the likes excluded,real apps included),we still don't know how it will fare in gaming and multimedia apps,the two things 90% of desktop users do on their PC.We know how it OCs(quite good),we know it's pretty cool even OCed,we can guess what power draw will it have.Everything else is not certain.
Your hypocrisy is amazing; maybe your eyes are good for only those charts that show good numbers for PII. Look, it's inevitable. I know you've seen some of the leaked shots too. By the way, don't you think the lack of benchmarksfrom AMD themselves is an indicator? What about the price of the product? Dude, I can't think for you. You can hold your breath till you pass out, and the results will remain the same. PII is no miracle chip; maybe in AMD-dom.![]()
The Cardboard Master Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64
If you already buy AM3 in the future. Then why not LGA1366 or LGA1156? Its not nice to compare it to LGA775. AM2(+) is there for that.
Plus honestly. Even tho people can upgrade the CPU only. We also know that there is something better and more fun ahead in terms of platform that you want. As AMD also continually reminds people. Platform, platform platform.
Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
The Cardboard Master Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64
I'm not saying that is an unreasonable approach to take, but with the difference in platform costs, one might be able to buy a DDR2 platform(motherboard & Ram) for either AMD or Intel and then a DDR3 platform 12 months later, for the same price as buying a DDR3 platform now, but get better overall performance and system life.
At this point in time I am not sold on the benefits of DDR3 for either side.
Actually won't a PhII processor work in either a DDR2 platform or a DDR3 one?
If so, that is a big advantage they will have.
And you show us what kind of a "great" dude you are by labeling us with "pretty names" while still pretending to be "realistic". Give me a break.I can label you the same but i wont.
I'm not holding any breath.Yeah of course i seen "the leaked slideware" and it tells me pretty much nothing,apart from bad scale on the charts and unrealistic scaling going from Q9300 to Q9400(much more than Mhz increase).
What I know is the chip has a potential to become great(if not most wanted) mainstream quad core part,it has all that is needed: high IPC,great OCing headroom,cheap and excellent platform to run on,very competitive price,great thermal properties be it stock or OCed,relatively low power draw. You can close your eyes at these facts all day long and recommend i7 left and right on this forum.It's all fine.But don't assume you know what others think and label them as residents of AMD-dom.It makes you look silly and fanboish.
The Cardboard Master Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64
intel are prepping a CPU below core i7 920
jp has already posted some results here fellas
intel will be price/performance competitive against AMD as well i think
by the time AMD gear all some out and things get going Intel will have decent deals too (january period)
Bookmarks