Results 1 to 25 of 397

Thread: AMD Shows Deneb (Phenom II) pictures of 6.2GHz CPUz etc

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Lansing, MI / London / Stinkaypore
    Posts
    1,788
    Core i7's static PMOS is quite voltage tolerant too, just that it didn't matter that much probably because the uncore section is a powerhog anyway.

    Lostcircuits measured it I think and got 44W for the uncore alone.
    Quote Originally Posted by radaja View Post
    so are they launching BD soon or a comic book?

  2. #2
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Quote Originally Posted by Macadamia View Post
    Core i7's static PMOS is quite voltage tolerant too, just that it didn't matter that much probably because the uncore section is a powerhog anyway.

    Lostcircuits measured it I think and got 44W for the uncore alone.
    I read their i7 Power Plays article.The article is quite an eye opener since they concluded that total chip power draw is near 204W(that's including uncore part).205W-210 for a stock 965EE with turned-off over-current protection is a lot,and there needs to be a change how review sites measure power draw from now on,since methods used up until now can't be applied to core i7 anymore since "the entire Uncore is uncoupled from the CPU’s main power supply coming in through the auxiliary 12V rail".
    Last edited by informal; 12-08-2008 at 02:43 AM.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    510
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    I read their i7 Power Plays article.The article is quite an eye opener since they concluded that total chip power draw is near 204W(that's including uncore part).
    They didn't conclude anything, they merely calculated using essentially worst-case figures. And from total system power measurements in reviews (and Lost Circuit's own measurements of the core power usage), i7 clearly does not use 200W.
    Last edited by accord99; 12-08-2008 at 03:07 AM.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by Macadamia View Post
    Core i7's static PMOS is quite voltage tolerant too, just that it didn't matter that much probably because the uncore section is a powerhog anyway.

    Lostcircuits measured it I think and got 44W for the uncore alone.
    They didnt measure anything. They took max values and made a dumb conclusion from that. Its abit like saying a 230V/10A outlet always pumps out 2300W nomatter what you plug in.

    http://www.lostcircuits.com/mambo//i...1&limitstart=3
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  5. #5
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    They didnt measure anything. They took max values and made a dumb conclusion from that. Its abit like saying a 230V/10A outlet always pumps out 2300W nomatter what you plug in.

    http://www.lostcircuits.com/mambo//i...1&limitstart=3
    indeed, they even mention in there articel themself, that intel said no commercial available software is able to utilize all parts of the cpu at once, so that 210W figure is just a (fictive) worse case.

    It would be the same if they would use the AMD Max power specs.
    I/O is rated at ~7W, NB somewhere around 23W and the highest IDDmax i have seen is 106A, but amd reated every TDP segemt on its own, intel on the other hand only lists the max possible for the whole family.

    So if you take the worse cases:
    30W uncore part
    106A*1,25V=132.5W
    --------------------------
    162.5W at a max frequency of 2.6ghz

    add a higher frequency and amd would be in the same range as intel.... worse case figures are useless.
    Last edited by Hornet331; 12-08-2008 at 04:20 AM.

  6. #6
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    EvE-Online, Tranquility
    Posts
    1,978
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornet331 View Post
    indeed, they even mention in there articel themself, that intel said no commercial available software is able to utilize all parts of the cpu at once, so that 210W figure is just a (fictive) worse case.
    In best case it's only 0W
    Synaptic Overflow

    CPU:
    -Intel Core i7 920 3841A522
    --CPU: 4200Mhz| Vcore: +120mV| Uncore: 3200Mhz| VTT: +100mV| Turbo: On| HT: Off
    ---CPU block: EK Supreme Acetal| Radiator: TCF X-Changer 480mm
    Motherboard:
    -Foxconn Bloodrage P06
    --Blck: 200Mhz| QPI: 3600Mhz
    Graphics:
    -Sapphire Radeon HD 4870X2
    --GPU: 750Mhz| GDDR: 900Mhz
    RAM:
    -3x 2GB Mushkin XP3-12800
    --Mhz: 800Mhz| Vdimm: 1.65V| Timings: 7-8-7-20-1T
    Storage:
    -3Ware 9650SE-2LP RAID controller
    --2x Western Digital 74GB Raptor RAID 0
    PSU:
    -Enermax Revolution 85+ 1250W
    OS:
    -Windows Vista Business x64


    ORDERED: Sapphire HD 5970 OC
    LOOKING FOR: 2x G.Skill Falcon II 128GB SSD, Windows 7

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •