Page 41 of 72 FirstFirst ... 313839404142434451 ... LastLast
Results 1,001 to 1,025 of 1781

Thread: My Dual Harper - Asus Z7S WS living review *56K warning*

  1. #1001
    c[_]
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    18,728
    Might need a reflash?

    All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.

  2. #1002
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    286
    i am using the one that one of the members got pre release... ill go try the "Official" one tommorow night..
    Asus Z7s WS
    2 x5450 Xeon @ 4.015ghz
    Quad channel DDR2 FBDIMM 8GB
    2 ATI 4850 1gb in Crossfire
    4 250gb SataII in Raid0
    1TB SataII
    Sata DVDRW
    BluRay-Rom
    Windows Vista Ultimate x64/OSX Leopard 10.5.5(Video cards dont work correctly)

  3. #1003
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    58
    Quote Originally Posted by jcool View Post
    Guys,

    I noticed an unpleasant bug with my new Z7S which the old one (which definitely was anotehr revision) didn't have.
    As soon as I set Vcore manually and save, it reboots fine but hangs and says "Press F1 tor necover bios settings, F2 to load defaults and continue". When I then enter bios, all voltage-related settings are set back to default. I circumvented this by loading my saved settings again, disabling "press F1 on error" option (or similar), hit F10 and it booted up fine using the Vcore settings I set.

    However, as soon as I reboot or shut down, the settings are lost again.

    Now, I don't care much because I hardly ever reboot or shut it down (roughly every 6-8 weeks when some update or program keeps nagging about a reboot) but this should be a real PITA for people who want to use the rig as their main systems

    And like I said, my old board definitely didn't have that problem. I guess Asus isn't done here yet, the bios still sucks.
    I have the same issue, however I noted that when you let it reboot at default values (so press F2) and than shutdown and startup again than enter the BIOS and than do your settings and reboot again you don't get the message again when normally rebooting/shutdown/startup.

    However as soon as your PC hangs (due to OC or because of windows/software) or reboots (by itself of by the user) before windows is loaded (so before the bios detected all hardware) it starts all over again.

  4. #1004
    Back from the Dead
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Posts
    6,602
    Ok I'll try that Madman666, hope it works. Maybe I'll need to re-download and flash the bios, the one I have is also the pre-release I think.
    World Community Grid - come join a great team and help us fight for a better tomorrow![size=1]


  5. #1005
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    58
    I'm (again) considering selling my 2x L5410 Xeon Asus z7s rig and buy an Gigabyte X58 UD5 and a 920.

    Main use: Adobe CS4, rendering and downloading

    Existing rig:
    -fast rendering
    -slow memory
    -no future upgrades
    -oc limited

    Pros i7 920:
    - future upgrades ?
    - exiting oc
    - fast memory
    -???

    Any ideas, suggestions?
    Need advice...

    @jcool: could you please post me the Nuclearus results of your new 920 @stock and @3.2?
    Last edited by Madman666; 12-03-2008 at 07:52 AM.

  6. #1006
    Mr. Boardburner
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    the Netherlands
    Posts
    5,340
    Unless you've got a lot of money to burn, your current rig should really be fine with what you use it for.
    Main rig:
    CPU: I7 920C0 @ 3.6Ghz (180*20)
    Mobo: DFI UT X58 T3eH8
    RAM: 12GB OCZ DDR3-1600 Platinum
    GPU/LCD: GeForce GTX280 + GeForce 8600GTS (Quad LCDs)
    Intel X25-M G2 80GB, 12TB storage
    PSU/Case: Corsair AX850, Silverstone TJ07

  7. #1007
    version 2.0
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Flanders
    Posts
    3,862
    Quote Originally Posted by Martijn View Post
    Unless you've got a lot of money to burn, your current rig should really be fine with what you use it for.
    The Xeon system (mobo/cpu's/RAM) is worth more than the i920 + UD5 + DDR3 combo. Actually, you could save some money here

  8. #1008
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    51

    Smile L5420's work great and keep the power consumption down

    Hey Guys,

    I've been waiting for ages to get onto this forum and share my results and ask some questions - I'll come back later for the questions, but they relate to the irritating reset of the bios and OC profile 50% of the times when I reboot my computer, thereby making it impossible to rely on it for remote control operations...

    Azus Z7S motherboard
    1 x Antec 650W Truepower Trio Power Supply - more efficient than my 550W Thermaltake PSU.
    2 x L5420 Xeon Processors (50w low voltage)
    8GB of Kingston RAM 1 x 8GB Kit (2 x 4GB modules - KVR800D2D4F5K2/8G)
    1 x 74GB Raptor 10,000 RPM for OS
    2 x Hitachi deskstar 160GB in RAID 0 (fast access documents and other high-speed stuff)
    1 x WD 250GB drive
    Running SATA as RAID with full caching/performance settings (Yes I have UPS and backup generator!)
    1 x ATI FireGL V5100 workstation graphics card supplying images to 2 x 19" Samsung LCD monitors.
    2 x OCZ Core V2 60GB SSDs on their way from the States to install in RAID 0 for OS, 2 more possibly to follow in the new year.
    D-TEK CPU Fuzion V2 waterblocks with quad core mid chamber inserts, Thermaltake GPU waterblock (bought D-TEK Fuzion GPU block but can't use it as it's not compatible with my FireGL - I'll have to use it with my new graphics card that I will add next year to run the 22-24" center screen)
    1 x Laing D5 Pump running on slowest/quietest setting
    1 x Thermaltake racing level radiator with 2 x 120mm fans in Thermaltake Armor case.
    1 x Thermaltake AquaBay M3 5.25" reservoir - looks nice but poorly thought of when constructed, want to change it for something better and with 3/8" couplings.

    I managed to get the L5420's to clock to 3308.00MHz with 441 FSB - I'm running 1.2ish vcore - totally stable. I kept speedstep enabled as I want the power savings. I am currently enjoying much more processor capacity than with my previous Pentium D (dual-core) 3.6GHz stock processor with a lot less power usage.

    Core Temp 0.96.1 Temperatures:

    Core #0: 50C
    Core #1: 42C
    Core #2: 42C
    Core #3: 44C
    Core #4: 45C
    Core #5: 48C
    Core #6: 45C
    Core #7: 46C
    Core #8: 46C

    Asus PC Probe II reports:

    CPU0: 34C
    CPU1: 36C
    MB: 34C

    Which program do you guys find to be more reliable?

    Has anyone been able to get more speed from either the L5420 or the E5420? Has anyone been able to go past 450 FSB with the vcore bios update?

    Regards

    Andrew
    Last edited by drewhemm; 12-03-2008 at 08:09 AM. Reason: grammar tidy
    My Workstation:

    Asus Z7S Motherboard
    2 x Intel L5420 Xeon 2.5Ghz - Overclocked to 3.3GHz, currently underclocked to 2.0GHz
    2 x Kingston 800MHz 4GB FB-DIMMs
    Microsoft 7 64-bit, Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit
    1 x Adaptec 2405 Hardware RAID Controller 128MB RAM, 800MHz Dual core processor
    2 x OCZ Core 60GB SSDs in RAID 0 - 280MB/s Sequential Read with 0.2MS access times!!!
    1 x WD Caviar Green 1TB
    1 x XFX Radeon HD 6950
    1 x XFX Radeon HD 5450
    1 x Benq G2400WD 24" Widescreen TFT
    Watercooling System for CPUs and Northbridge
    1 x Antec TruePower Trio 650w Power Supply
    Thermaltake Armor Case with Optional Side Fan

    Total System PassMark PerformanceTest Score v6.1 - 5007.9 @ 3.08GHz

  9. #1009
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    286
    Jcool, get the bios from Asus site.

    http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=455152

    1.35vcore in bios, gets me 1.3 in windows, running 440fsb, about to go tweak it up.
    temps are around 55c idle though.. that was idle on Copper and fan heatsinks, TJmax is 100c on these chips, so i will try and keep it under 70c..
    Asus Z7s WS
    2 x5450 Xeon @ 4.015ghz
    Quad channel DDR2 FBDIMM 8GB
    2 ATI 4850 1gb in Crossfire
    4 250gb SataII in Raid0
    1TB SataII
    Sata DVDRW
    BluRay-Rom
    Windows Vista Ultimate x64/OSX Leopard 10.5.5(Video cards dont work correctly)

  10. #1010
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    286
    still has that reboot bug, but i did manage to pull this off , my goal has been met..

    http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=455163

    edit, Super pi done in 11 seconds, 1M
    Cinebench 64bit scored 29k
    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=797627
    Last edited by shanems3; 12-03-2008 at 10:39 AM.
    Asus Z7s WS
    2 x5450 Xeon @ 4.015ghz
    Quad channel DDR2 FBDIMM 8GB
    2 ATI 4850 1gb in Crossfire
    4 250gb SataII in Raid0
    1TB SataII
    Sata DVDRW
    BluRay-Rom
    Windows Vista Ultimate x64/OSX Leopard 10.5.5(Video cards dont work correctly)

  11. #1011
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    82
    2 x 4GB modules
    Get two more to take advantage of the quad channel bandwidth.
    MOBO Biostar TpowerX58 | CPU Intel i7 920 | GPU eVGA GTX 295 SLI | RAM Super Talent 12GB DDR3-1333 CL8 | SSD Super Talent 64GB | PSU Coolmax 1200W

  12. #1012
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    58
    Quote Originally Posted by drewhemm View Post
    Hey Guys,

    I've been waiting for ages to get onto this forum and share my results and ask some questions - I'll come back later for the questions, but they relate to the irritating reset of the bios and OC profile 50% of the times when I reboot my computer, thereby making it impossible to rely on it for remote control operations...

    Azus Z7S motherboard
    1 x Antec 650W Truepower Trio Power Supply - more efficient than my 550W Thermaltake PSU.
    2 x L5420 Xeon Processors (50w low voltage)
    8GB of Kingston RAM 1 x 8GB Kit (2 x 4GB modules - KVR800D2D4F5K2/8G)
    1 x 74GB Raptor 10,000 RPM for OS
    2 x Hitachi deskstar 160GB in RAID 0 (fast access documents and other high-speed stuff)
    1 x WD 250GB drive
    Running SATA as RAID with full caching/performance settings (Yes I have UPS and backup generator!)
    1 x ATI FireGL V5100 workstation graphics card supplying images to 2 x 19" Samsung LCD monitors.
    2 x OCZ Core V2 60GB SSDs on their way from the States to install in RAID 0 for OS, 2 more possibly to follow in the new year.
    D-TEK CPU Fuzion V2 waterblocks with quad core mid chamber inserts, Thermaltake GPU waterblock (bought D-TEK Fuzion GPU block but can't use it as it's not compatible with my FireGL - I'll have to use it with my new graphics card that I will add next year to run the 22-24" center screen)
    1 x Laing D5 Pump running on slowest/quietest setting
    1 x Thermaltake racing level radiator with 2 x 120mm fans in Thermaltake Armor case.
    1 x Thermaltake AquaBay M3 5.25" reservoir - looks nice but poorly thought of when constructed, want to change it for something better and with 3/8" couplings.

    I managed to get the L5420's to clock to 3308.00MHz with 441 FSB - I'm running 1.2ish vcore - totally stable. I kept speedstep enabled as I want the power savings. I am currently enjoying much more processor capacity than with my previous Pentium D (dual-core) 3.6GHz stock processor with a lot less power usage.

    Core Temp 0.96.1 Temperatures:

    Core #0: 50C
    Core #1: 42C
    Core #2: 42C
    Core #3: 44C
    Core #4: 45C
    Core #5: 48C
    Core #6: 45C
    Core #7: 46C
    Core #8: 46C

    Asus PC Probe II reports:

    CPU0: 34C
    CPU1: 36C
    MB: 34C

    Which program do you guys find to be more reliable?

    Has anyone been able to get more speed from either the L5420 or the E5420? Has anyone been able to go past 450 FSB with the vcore bios update?

    Regards

    Andrew
    Hi Andrew,
    I have L5410's with the z7s.
    Unfortunately I have not been above 400 FSB, so you are one lucky
    Anyway, did you look how your memory is detected in the bios ?
    Mine says 667Mhz but it truly is 800Mhz ! I also have Kingston, however 4x2GB.

    Did you change any other voltages, besides the Vcore ? Which BIOS do you have ? 0401 ?
    Intel stated the Tjunction max for these CPU's should be 70C. If you use coretemp, you can adjust Tj.max and you should have the "correct" temps.
    However, testing looks Tj max should be more in the line of 75-80C.
    Because I think coretemps should be at idle ±5-10 above cpu temp.

    Anyway, i hope you put some benches up.

    BTW: what are your Dimm temps?
    Last edited by Madman666; 12-03-2008 at 12:17 PM.

  13. #1013
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    58
    Quote Originally Posted by [XC] Jaco View Post
    The Xeon system (mobo/cpu's/RAM) is worth more than the i920 + UD5 + DDR3 combo. Actually, you could save some money here
    You are actually quite right !
    I must have been

  14. #1014
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    286
    madman, the reason your 800 mem shows up as 667 is because our Memory runs 1:1 with cpu, the fsb on the processor is 333, so 333 on the mem too, i cranked mine manualy to 400 to get the memory at 800, and my processor at 3.6ghz.. that is leaving all voltages at normal/auto
    Asus Z7s WS
    2 x5450 Xeon @ 4.015ghz
    Quad channel DDR2 FBDIMM 8GB
    2 ATI 4850 1gb in Crossfire
    4 250gb SataII in Raid0
    1TB SataII
    Sata DVDRW
    BluRay-Rom
    Windows Vista Ultimate x64/OSX Leopard 10.5.5(Video cards dont work correctly)

  15. #1015
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    58
    Quote Originally Posted by shanems3 View Post
    madman, the reason your 800 mem shows up as 667 is because our Memory runs 1:1 with cpu, the fsb on the processor is 333, so 333 on the mem too, i cranked mine manualy to 400 to get the memory at 800, and my processor at 3.6ghz.. that is leaving all voltages at normal/auto
    I know, but I'm running at 396 (that's my max ) and the memory still says 667.
    So at 400 Mhz or above it should say 800 ?
    I cannot get more than 396 stable. from 397 to 400 it boots into Vista but freezes up when testing. 401 just freezes at boot.
    Already tried 1.26Vcore, 1.30 MCH, 1.83 mem. E1C and speedstep disabled.
    Also tried everything default besides the FSB.
    What did you change from the default ?

  16. #1016
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    1,097
    Madman666 YGPM
    Member of XS WCG since 2006-11-25




  17. #1017
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    51
    Quote Originally Posted by jt1 View Post
    Get two more to take advantage of the quad channel bandwidth.
    I thought about that - is there a noticeable performance difference to justify the extra $$$ ? I bought 4GB modules so that I would have the upgrade path available in the future when the prices drop.

    Quote Originally Posted by Madman666 View Post
    Hi Andrew,
    I have L5410's with the z7s.
    Unfortunately I have not been above 400 FSB, so you are one lucky
    Anyway, did you look how your memory is detected in the bios ?
    Mine says 667Mhz but it truly is 800Mhz ! I also have Kingston, however 4x2GB.

    Did you change any other voltages, besides the Vcore ? Which BIOS do you have ? 0401 ?
    Intel stated the Tjunction max for these CPU's should be 70C. If you use coretemp, you can adjust Tj.max and you should have the "correct" temps.
    However, testing looks Tj max should be more in the line of 75-80C.
    Because I think coretemps should be at idle ±5-10 above cpu temp.

    Anyway, i hope you put some benches up.

    BTW: what are your Dimm temps?
    My 800's are also showing as 667's. DIMM1 is running at 60c and DIMM2(Slot 3) is running at 54c. I have a small silent system fan sitting on top of the Northbridge that is sharing some ventilation with the memory and I also have a 250mm side case fan. I'm in the Spanish winter right now and my office is very cold - we'll see how they fare in the summer!

    I'm running bios version 0401 and I haven't changed any other voltages, wasn't sure about it as this is my first time overclocking!

    I've attached a screenshot from Cinebench R10 - running 36 seconds for the x CPU test. Another screenshot shows the comparison between the new rig and the old rig. Even the OpenGL scores are higher!

    Quote Originally Posted by shanems3 View Post
    madman, the reason your 800 mem shows up as 667 is because our Memory runs 1:1 with cpu, the fsb on the processor is 333, so 333 on the mem too, i cranked mine manualy to 400 to get the memory at 800, and my processor at 3.6ghz.. that is leaving all voltages at normal/auto
    What do I need to do in order to get my memory to show as 800? I thought it was because I am running a 1333MHz processor and you need a 1600Mhz CPU to run 800MHz memory.

    Regards

    Andrew
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	multi_cpu.jpg 
Views:	374 
Size:	113.5 KB 
ID:	90087   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	cinebench_database.jpg 
Views:	367 
Size:	16.5 KB 
ID:	90088  
    My Workstation:

    Asus Z7S Motherboard
    2 x Intel L5420 Xeon 2.5Ghz - Overclocked to 3.3GHz, currently underclocked to 2.0GHz
    2 x Kingston 800MHz 4GB FB-DIMMs
    Microsoft 7 64-bit, Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit
    1 x Adaptec 2405 Hardware RAID Controller 128MB RAM, 800MHz Dual core processor
    2 x OCZ Core 60GB SSDs in RAID 0 - 280MB/s Sequential Read with 0.2MS access times!!!
    1 x WD Caviar Green 1TB
    1 x XFX Radeon HD 6950
    1 x XFX Radeon HD 5450
    1 x Benq G2400WD 24" Widescreen TFT
    Watercooling System for CPUs and Northbridge
    1 x Antec TruePower Trio 650w Power Supply
    Thermaltake Armor Case with Optional Side Fan

    Total System PassMark PerformanceTest Score v6.1 - 5007.9 @ 3.08GHz

  18. #1018
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    51
    Forgot to mention none of my core temperatures went above 62c during Cinebench - and that's from Core Temp. Immediately went back to high 40's afterward.
    My Workstation:

    Asus Z7S Motherboard
    2 x Intel L5420 Xeon 2.5Ghz - Overclocked to 3.3GHz, currently underclocked to 2.0GHz
    2 x Kingston 800MHz 4GB FB-DIMMs
    Microsoft 7 64-bit, Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit
    1 x Adaptec 2405 Hardware RAID Controller 128MB RAM, 800MHz Dual core processor
    2 x OCZ Core 60GB SSDs in RAID 0 - 280MB/s Sequential Read with 0.2MS access times!!!
    1 x WD Caviar Green 1TB
    1 x XFX Radeon HD 6950
    1 x XFX Radeon HD 5450
    1 x Benq G2400WD 24" Widescreen TFT
    Watercooling System for CPUs and Northbridge
    1 x Antec TruePower Trio 650w Power Supply
    Thermaltake Armor Case with Optional Side Fan

    Total System PassMark PerformanceTest Score v6.1 - 5007.9 @ 3.08GHz

  19. #1019
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    58
    Quote Originally Posted by drewhemm View Post
    Forgot to mention none of my core temperatures went above 62c during Cinebench - and that's from Core Temp. Immediately went back to high 40's afterward.
    Just set in the settings Show Delta Tjunction max. temp
    You then see how much "headroom" you have left until the max. temp is reached.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	coretemp.jpg 
Views:	382 
Size:	70.2 KB 
ID:	90089  

  20. #1020
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    51

    Thumbs up Multi-tasking heaven!

    I must say that for anyone who is considering a rig like this the raw processor benchmarks don't do the potential and capacity of this setup justice - in my opinion, it's the multitasking that is most important for daily workstation use - the ability to do more things at once; for me, that will directly translate into more income - the speed is a bonus!

    I'd be curious to know how a dual-harpertown workstation would compare to a single Core i7, as the latter can also execute 8 threads, but only has four physical cores. I've read reviews that say that hyperthreading is much better on the Core i7 than on previous processors, but I still have a gut feeling that it's better to have 8 physical cores - I haven't found any direct comparisons yet. Otherwise, a comparative setup would be a quad socket AMD (more cores but slower clocks) or a dual Core i7, but dual Core i7 boards aren't available from Asus yet, I heard that overclocking is limited and the power consumption is higher compared to the 50w L5420s.

    I'm currently downloading a trial of VMware Workstation as I'm curious to see how well it runs virtualization, I may end up running 64-bit Windows XP on the host and 32-bit Windows XP on the guest. Might be reason for me to upgrade to 16GB quad channel RAM. I'll report back on that...
    Last edited by drewhemm; 12-03-2008 at 02:32 PM.
    My Workstation:

    Asus Z7S Motherboard
    2 x Intel L5420 Xeon 2.5Ghz - Overclocked to 3.3GHz, currently underclocked to 2.0GHz
    2 x Kingston 800MHz 4GB FB-DIMMs
    Microsoft 7 64-bit, Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit
    1 x Adaptec 2405 Hardware RAID Controller 128MB RAM, 800MHz Dual core processor
    2 x OCZ Core 60GB SSDs in RAID 0 - 280MB/s Sequential Read with 0.2MS access times!!!
    1 x WD Caviar Green 1TB
    1 x XFX Radeon HD 6950
    1 x XFX Radeon HD 5450
    1 x Benq G2400WD 24" Widescreen TFT
    Watercooling System for CPUs and Northbridge
    1 x Antec TruePower Trio 650w Power Supply
    Thermaltake Armor Case with Optional Side Fan

    Total System PassMark PerformanceTest Score v6.1 - 5007.9 @ 3.08GHz

  21. #1021
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    51
    Quote Originally Posted by Madman666 View Post
    Just set in the settings Show Delta Tjunction max. temp
    You then see how much "headroom" you have left until the max. temp is reached.
    Ah, I had an older version of Core Temp, I have now downloaded 0.99.3 and I have the option to change the Tjunction Max offset.

    Also, the CPU temperatures now agree with Asus PC Probe, so I am guessing Core Temp's database has been updated.

    Thanks Madman!
    My Workstation:

    Asus Z7S Motherboard
    2 x Intel L5420 Xeon 2.5Ghz - Overclocked to 3.3GHz, currently underclocked to 2.0GHz
    2 x Kingston 800MHz 4GB FB-DIMMs
    Microsoft 7 64-bit, Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit
    1 x Adaptec 2405 Hardware RAID Controller 128MB RAM, 800MHz Dual core processor
    2 x OCZ Core 60GB SSDs in RAID 0 - 280MB/s Sequential Read with 0.2MS access times!!!
    1 x WD Caviar Green 1TB
    1 x XFX Radeon HD 6950
    1 x XFX Radeon HD 5450
    1 x Benq G2400WD 24" Widescreen TFT
    Watercooling System for CPUs and Northbridge
    1 x Antec TruePower Trio 650w Power Supply
    Thermaltake Armor Case with Optional Side Fan

    Total System PassMark PerformanceTest Score v6.1 - 5007.9 @ 3.08GHz

  22. #1022
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    286
    Quote Originally Posted by Madman666 View Post
    I know, but I'm running at 396 (that's my max ) and the memory still says 667.
    So at 400 Mhz or above it should say 800 ?
    I cannot get more than 396 stable. from 397 to 400 it boots into Vista but freezes up when testing. 401 just freezes at boot.
    Already tried 1.26Vcore, 1.30 MCH, 1.83 mem. E1C and speedstep disabled.
    Also tried everything default besides the FSB.
    What did you change from the default ?

    yes, when you hit 400mhz, they show up as 800mhz chips,

    EnableStepspeed, 1.35mch 1.83mem, i had to go to 1.35Vcore on each to boot 440fsb, try going to 1.3vcore if you are water cooled..
    Asus Z7s WS
    2 x5450 Xeon @ 4.015ghz
    Quad channel DDR2 FBDIMM 8GB
    2 ATI 4850 1gb in Crossfire
    4 250gb SataII in Raid0
    1TB SataII
    Sata DVDRW
    BluRay-Rom
    Windows Vista Ultimate x64/OSX Leopard 10.5.5(Video cards dont work correctly)

  23. #1023
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    51

    Question Memory Speeds...

    Quote Originally Posted by shanems3 View Post
    yes, when you hit 400mhz, they show up as 800mhz chips,
    Does the FSB need to be exactly 400MHz? I am running 441MHz and still the memory shows as 667MHz...
    My Workstation:

    Asus Z7S Motherboard
    2 x Intel L5420 Xeon 2.5Ghz - Overclocked to 3.3GHz, currently underclocked to 2.0GHz
    2 x Kingston 800MHz 4GB FB-DIMMs
    Microsoft 7 64-bit, Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit
    1 x Adaptec 2405 Hardware RAID Controller 128MB RAM, 800MHz Dual core processor
    2 x OCZ Core 60GB SSDs in RAID 0 - 280MB/s Sequential Read with 0.2MS access times!!!
    1 x WD Caviar Green 1TB
    1 x XFX Radeon HD 6950
    1 x XFX Radeon HD 5450
    1 x Benq G2400WD 24" Widescreen TFT
    Watercooling System for CPUs and Northbridge
    1 x Antec TruePower Trio 650w Power Supply
    Thermaltake Armor Case with Optional Side Fan

    Total System PassMark PerformanceTest Score v6.1 - 5007.9 @ 3.08GHz

  24. #1024
    Back from the Dead
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Posts
    6,602
    Quote Originally Posted by drewhemm View Post
    I must say that for anyone who is considering a rig like this the raw processor benchmarks don't do the potential and capacity of this setup justice - in my opinion, it's the multitasking that is most important for daily workstation use - the ability to do more things at once; for me, that will directly translate into more income - the speed is a bonus!

    I'd be curious to know how a dual-harpertown workstation would compare to a single Core i7, as the latter can also execute 8 threads, but only has four physical cores. I've read reviews that say that hyperthreading is much better on the Core i7 than on previous processors, but I still have a gut feeling that it's better to have 8 physical cores - I haven't found any direct comparisons yet. Otherwise, a comparative setup would be a quad socket AMD (more cores but slower clocks) or a dual Core i7, but dual Core i7 boards aren't available from Asus yet, I heard that overclocking is limited and the power consumption is higher compared to the 50w L5420s.

    I'm currently downloading a trial of VMware Workstation as I'm curious to see how well it runs virtualization, I may end up running 64-bit Windows XP on the host and 32-bit Windows XP on the guest. Might be reason for me to upgrade to 16GB quad channel RAM. I'll report back on that...
    My Dual X5450's at 4,05Ghz are around 30-50% faster than an i7 clocked at 4Ghz. Leave out benches that are completely memory-dependant (like Winrar) and you get closer to 50% most of the time. Apps I have compared so far: WCG HCC, Cinebench, 3DMark CPU, TrueCrypt, wPrime. I think there was more.. I should do a comprehensive writeup of the results I know, but I really don't have the time

    So for now, you can either believe me, or bench for yourself
    The most important factor on a Dual S771 setup (besides the CPU clock speed) is the FSB, by the way. If you compare my bench runs and daily results with same or higher clocked CPUs on a ST with lower FSB, the Z7S always wins. FSB is a real bottleneck here, every Mhz helps especially as you go up in clock speed.
    World Community Grid - come join a great team and help us fight for a better tomorrow![size=1]


  25. #1025
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    51
    Quote Originally Posted by jcool View Post
    My Dual X5450's at 4,05Ghz are around 30-50% faster than an i7 clocked at 4Ghz. Leave out benches that are completely memory-dependant (like Winrar) and you get closer to 50% most of the time.
    That's good - so I don't need to feel stupid for splashing out on this hardware!
    My Workstation:

    Asus Z7S Motherboard
    2 x Intel L5420 Xeon 2.5Ghz - Overclocked to 3.3GHz, currently underclocked to 2.0GHz
    2 x Kingston 800MHz 4GB FB-DIMMs
    Microsoft 7 64-bit, Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit
    1 x Adaptec 2405 Hardware RAID Controller 128MB RAM, 800MHz Dual core processor
    2 x OCZ Core 60GB SSDs in RAID 0 - 280MB/s Sequential Read with 0.2MS access times!!!
    1 x WD Caviar Green 1TB
    1 x XFX Radeon HD 6950
    1 x XFX Radeon HD 5450
    1 x Benq G2400WD 24" Widescreen TFT
    Watercooling System for CPUs and Northbridge
    1 x Antec TruePower Trio 650w Power Supply
    Thermaltake Armor Case with Optional Side Fan

    Total System PassMark PerformanceTest Score v6.1 - 5007.9 @ 3.08GHz

Page 41 of 72 FirstFirst ... 313839404142434451 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •