MMM
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 32 of 32

Thread: Phenom 9950BE 4.1GHz Over

  1. #26
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Tokyo,Japan
    Posts
    29
    Quote Originally Posted by massman View Post
    Thank you very much for posting, Donbe, excellent results!

    I was wondering if you will be challenging the Superpi 1M/32M and Hexus Pifast benchmark in the near future?
    Hi,massman-san.
    I was not believed by myself
    In Phenom born in such low temperature and a clock.

    In the first place,I heard good information of Deneb and did Overclocking of Phenom to prepare.
    I made a POST by chance because the result was good.

    Because Deneb was a public performance, I did not perform that I was particular in Phenom 

    If I can get Deneb, I want to aim at a good record 

  2. #27
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Athens -> Hellas
    Posts
    944
    Xcellent results, Donbe ...Keep up till Deneb arrives...

    Greetings from Greece...

  3. #28
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Tokyo,Japan
    Posts
    29
    Quote Originally Posted by felix_w View Post
    Xcellent results, Donbe ...Keep up till Deneb arrives...

    Greetings from Greece...
    Hi,felix_w-san.
    Thank you.

    The interest to Deneb, becomes active slowly in Japan.
    I wish it is released without being late for the sale date when Deneb.

  4. #29
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Tokyo,Japan
    Posts
    29

    My result Update

    Hi,
    I was able to update a self-record

    This CPU batch is 0843APGW.
    With LN2, it was OK to -100 degrees Celsius.


    4197.94MHz at 1.75V

    CPU-Z Validation : http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=470547

    The next challenge is a plan of Deneb


    CPU : AMD Phenom X4 9950 Black Edition (0843APGW)
    M/B : DFI LanParty DK 790GX-M2RS (BIOS : R7GDB21)
    RAM : A-DATA Extreme Edition DDR2-1200 1GB*2
    VGA : GIGABYTE RADEON HD4850
    PSU : Silverstone OP800W
    HDD : Transcend TS32GSSD25S-M 32GB*1 (non-RAID)
    OS : Microsoft Windows XP Pro SP3
    V-TEC ARC Bed Professional Rev.5.4 by Vigor

    CPU Head : KURIPro4.5 by TAM (LN2 -95~105℃)
    Chipset Cooling : 90*90*25mm 1,600r.p.m.Fan (Air Cooling)

  5. #30
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Athens -> Hellas
    Posts
    944
    Once again, excellent results, Donbe...

    You 've got a great piece in your hands...

  6. #31
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Birmingham AL.
    Posts
    1,079
    Wow cold bug gone on Agena?
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

  7. #32
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by demonkevy666 View Post
    I believe that Ht clocks getting higher are releasing the cold bugs, that have plagued amd for so long. I'm saying this just because I noteiced that x2 with 1,000mhzdon't do well below -40 and phenom with HT 3.0 seem to have gotten as low a -60 this new phenom II can handle the 2,600mhz. unlike 9850-9950 which most will do 2,400mhz on the nb but fail at the higher 2,600mhz HT (not all of the fail just that most do) so droping the HT to 200mhz may well see well over 6ghz on LN2
    this post is from the general hard ware section by me in phenom II relative preference

    the -100 low 200mhz HT vs 1780mhz -50 high HT this maybe actual proof of my post.
    sweet.
    HAVE NO FEAR!
    "AMD fallen angel"
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamekiller View Post
    You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •