mua maybe intell knows that the lenght of the cpu's life will be shortend by a few months... Us the normal users will have a hard time knowing that info or some intel engineer should post here.
mua maybe intell knows that the lenght of the cpu's life will be shortend by a few months... Us the normal users will have a hard time knowing that info or some intel engineer should post here.
Yeah, I read this on the Corsair Forums too. Right now we're in the end user test phase...hehehe...I think it's better to set all settings manually until everybody gets to play with all the different settings and see what they do. I'm real careful with mine right now. I'm really watching myself, and trust nothing I read in BIOS. I'm checking and testing through ProbeIt manually to make sure the BIOS agrees...there ARE variances of course.
I just got mine running lastnight, so I'm controlling myself for the time being. I'm also on stock retail cooling, so I kinda have to chill with it.
Last edited by T_Flight; 11-25-2008 at 02:05 PM.
yup mine does
as far as i can tell the XMP profile increases uncore to 1.55 and ram to 1.65
last night i worked out that i can run much higher QPI with lower uncore than first night
i will do a thread soon to report my findings which will hopefully save a few headaches for ppl OCing GB boards at very least i hope
1,475 VTT and 1.78 vdimm for now. CPU needs a LOT of volt. Mem 8-8-8-18-1T.
![]()
There's a problem : 143x28 = 4004, not 3986. Moreover, i get 9m flat with the same settings everywhere (uncore, ram, cpu...). Perhaps my 0703 is faster than 0804 :/
its not a problem
clocks seems to jump up and down like that
its weird but it happens here too
you are right about his time
it looks slow
Seems multi/bclck combination, with some clocks change all the time. And yes its sloooowjust started to play and a lot to do for sure
![]()
well thats what xmp and epp are meant for, they can set vdimm too, but what i mean is that some mainboards BIOS increase vdimm to much more than the xmp has programmed in it (up to 2.1v) if you select high bclock or memory clock settings.
huh? your xmp profile increase uncore voltage?
and to 1.55v? wee, thats a big high isnt it?
i mean everybody is running 1.55 uncore when pushing i7 it seems, but it shouldnt be the default setting!
you can run higher qpi with lower uncore, what do you mean?
higher qpi ratio? higher bclock? higher overall qpi speed?
with lower uncore voltage or lower uncore ratio?
update about the first dead i7:
it was a 965 and it died after one day of 2.2-2.4v vdimm
And was it a box or ES ? It seems that rev B0 & C0 are quite different !
at first when i started testing i found that i had to run high uncore to get stability
i've figured out how to run high BCKL without high uncore voltage now
thats what i meant
yeah when you select profile 1 in XMP profile it says that vdimm is 1.65 and QPI voltage is 1.55...i assume that is uncore voltage
it took me a while to realise that to get stable BCKL you have to run QPI clocks at 4xRAM MHz
so 900 on RAM has to be 900x4=3600 in QPI or forget about stability
i've been running around 1.42v uncore and 1.74vdimm for most benches
i've also had the vcore at 1.5-1.55 on air in the last few sessions
i'm already sick of air testing
will have to insulate this GB board for single stage....pain in the arse to insulate
saaya can you ask the guy if he ran low vcore with high vdimm
i have a feeling that you have to jack up the vcore as well when you run high vdimm like back in AMD days ...i do it as a precaution lol
Last edited by Pt1t; 11-26-2008 at 01:53 AM.
***** Visit us on PCWorld.fr *****
thomas
are you the guy saaya is referring to
what board?
what vcore
why did you run such a high difference between VTT and vdimm
francois suggested within 0.5V difference between uncore and vdimm
***** Visit us on PCWorld.fr *****
looks up tweak it on google![]()
***** Visit us on PCWorld.fr *****
yeah i realised as soon as i googled
this might be a silly question but how do you know that's what killed the CPU
***** Visit us on PCWorld.fr *****
sorry to hear
it sucks losing CPUs
first CPUs i killed were 45nm intels
they arent as tough as they used to be heh
Why shouldn't we set more than 0.5v difference between vtt and vdimm ? I run 1.5/2.2 for few hours without problems (i did't say that it would be no consequence)
***** Visit us on PCWorld.fr *****
thx for the information
and im sorry to hear about your loss Thomas
beg up and keep pushing it
hmmmm damn all this different terms for core i7 architecture
so you mean qpi speed has to be 3600Mhz for ddr3 1800?
4.8GT/s is 2400Mhz is 18x133
5.6GT/s is 2800Mhz is 21x133
6.4GT/s is 3200Mhz is 24x133
You mean GT/s? even that doesnt make sense... sorry, i had a few beer maybe thats it but i really dont get you m8
what do you mean with qpi has to be 3600Mhz for 900Mhz ram?
dont expect too much man, from what i heard most chips only scale a few hundred mhz on ln2 :/
btw, i asked our engineers about giving more space around the cpu socket and they said it will definately impact how well the pwm works and how stable vcore is, so... they recommend to keep the caps relatively close to the socket. i asked for at least 1cm free space around the socket.
and you can actually unscrew the metal socket part of 1366, that really helps for insulation! the cpu wont be clamped down anymore, so pressure has to keep it down and after removing the pot itll stick to it, but thats ok
its worth the way improved insulation once the metal stuff around the socket is gone
well what do you expect, 1.7v vtt to have 2.2v vdimm?
then the cpu would probably not die from vdimm but rather vtt
if you want to kill an i7 all it takes is high vtt...
dont ask how i know that ^^
thanks a lot for sharing your information thomas!![]()
Last edited by saaya; 11-26-2008 at 05:43 AM.
i have to do a bios template
i am still lost with all these names to be honest
keep in mind that i've only had a couple of days testing experience so my findings are fresh to say the least heheh
but yeah what i've found on the GB board is while you could run NB Frequency in a different ratio to 4:1 i am talking about for high BCKL clocks and benching speeds on RAM i found that using NB Frequency 4x bigger than RAM frequency is easiest to get stability
let me show with an example
RAM is running at 1018MHz and NB Frequency is at 4x times that >> 4072MHz
do you understand what i mean
saaya what is dangerous VTT
i've run 1.65v so far heheheh
Bookmarks