I posted this in amd section,but might as well here since more people reads news.
They did update the blog with Crysis Warhead numbers(4870X2 used and only Deneb @ stock 3Ghz for now):
http://markbench.blogspot.com/2008/1...ead-deneb.html
Anyone knows what numbers C2Q@3Ghz or Core i7 @3-3.2Ghz show in this game and resolution settings with 4870X2?
Crysis Warhead @ Deneb
Only with factory default freqs.
Cpu name: Phenom II 940 (core Deneb, AM2+) @ 3GHz
Motherboard: M3A79-T Deluxe (AMD 790FX+SB750 )
Memory: 4096 Mb CSX 1066MHz (DDR2)
Graphics: Gigabyte 4870X2 2048Mb
Os: Win Vista 64 Service Pack 1
Drivers: Motherboard bios: 0602, Catalyst 8.10, MB chipset 3.0.642.0
Crysis Warhead: DX10 high, shaders very high, 1920x1200x32, AA off
Results:
Average:47fps
Max: 84fps
Min: 36fps
bye: Dred
Its time to sleep fellaz! 4pm! lol
Sleep at 4 PM.... ok..
here's what i found, with warhead, not X2 but 2x4870..it shows around 33fps 1900x1200x32 no AA
don't know what is "enthusiast quality" settings though...
cpu doesn't seem to be the bottleneck though as fps is still increasing with 3xGTX280
that would be around 50% more fps with a similar settup
i'm really confused by those numbers, i'd like to see same numbers with same settings on i940
could it be the ram on this X2 vs the ram on regular 4870? the perf gap between GTX ans 4870 could point it
http://www.presence-pc.com/tests/core-i7-jeux-22829/9/
From the same blog.. hereThis is Phenom (940).
@1,92V=5210MHz!
@1,78V=4530MHz!
These numbers seem more inline with what we were expecting to see.
" Business is Binary, your either a 1 or a 0, alive or dead." - Gary Winston ^^
Asus rampage III formula,i7 980xm, H70, Silverstone Ft02, Gigabyte Windforce 580 GTX SLI, Corsair AX1200, intel x-25m 160gb, 2 x OCZ vertex 2 180gb, hp zr30w, 12gb corsair vengeance
Rig 2
i7 980x ,h70, Antec Lanboy Air, Samsung md230x3 ,Saphhire 6970 Xfired, Antec ax1200w, x-25m 160gb, 2 x OCZ vertex 2 180gb,12gb Corsair Vengence MSI Big Bang Xpower
I'd still like to think that based on these preliminary results that 4ghz+ should be easily obtainable for anyone with a good mobo and decent cooling... Looking forward to January!
i7-2600K @ 4806Mhz 102.3x47 1.368v LinX stable
MSI P67 GD-80
16Gb Corsair 8-8-8-24 1T 818.2Mhz
MSI GTX560Ti 1005/2250 1.062v
Crucial m4 256Gb SSD
Corsair TX850 | 64bit WIN7 Pro
Custom watercooling
47" 1080p LCD | Onkyo 876/ Polk 5.1 surround
" Business is Binary, your either a 1 or a 0, alive or dead." - Gary Winston ^^
Asus rampage III formula,i7 980xm, H70, Silverstone Ft02, Gigabyte Windforce 580 GTX SLI, Corsair AX1200, intel x-25m 160gb, 2 x OCZ vertex 2 180gb, hp zr30w, 12gb corsair vengeance
Rig 2
i7 980x ,h70, Antec Lanboy Air, Samsung md230x3 ,Saphhire 6970 Xfired, Antec ax1200w, x-25m 160gb, 2 x OCZ vertex 2 180gb,12gb Corsair Vengence MSI Big Bang Xpower
18 pages and not one picture of that 6.3GHz... why? don't understand, why there is no pictures of this outstanding result.
Of these two phenom II chips, which will overclock better?
1. phenom 2 940 AM2+ 125 watt (unlocked)
2. phenom 2 945 AM3 95 watt (unlocked)
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Bring... bring the amber lamps.
Because AMD forbade anyone to do so. NDA in other words. Every journalist had to tone down their articles as AMD did not really want to reveal what these could do under LN2. Maybe to try and contain the hype somewhat. Some people are already yelling things like "Nehalem killer!", which is a bit of an exaggeration at this point in time as there are no reliable performance reviews out yet.
"When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman
Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |
Last edited by informal; 11-23-2008 at 04:37 PM.
Or maybe it will match Agena clock for clock?
Hornet,the dude clearly can't say exact figures as he is limited obviously by NDA.
Just FYI,3.6Ghz is 11%(eleven percent) lower than 4Ghz.Eleven percent is nothing,especially as we know by now how well Deneb reacts to additional VCore,provided you have good air cooling.The chip has very low power draw even though default Vcore is 1.35V.So 1.6V is not that high for this gen. of AMD chips.
edit: don't forget the posted benchmark results from that blog could be fake,so we need to keep that possibility in mind.
Last edited by informal; 11-23-2008 at 05:12 PM.
what dont you quote saaya's post saying more vcore doesnt help while you're at it
Why don't you ask saaya what stepping did he test while you're at it?C1 or C2?ES or retail?
It'd hurt AMD
When is the NDA lifted so we can see the real thing and not this damn speculation and useless blabla? Hey I SWEAR I have a 10GHz i7! ON AIR! 1,6v is NOTHING. But I won't let you see it beause I'm under my own NDA, instead I'll tease you a bit. Are you jealous?
They better release some real evidences of this soon.
Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)
I would belive that. It's typical of 65nm chips especially, that they respond to cooling much more than Vcore. 1.45v was the sweetspot on them if you couldn't get temps way down. Pumping more volts on air, even very good air results in bugger all more headroom.
notably different to the intel's
but anyway, as mentioned, what is the stepping, and how old are saaya's chips?
Bookmarks