Prescott results post here.

[skate2snow]

hey,

This is probably a early tread, but if some dont care for NDA post results

whats the chip and how it OC, Which cooling, Which cooling you try and how much you win(OC) by changing, temps(idle, full load) BIOS voltage, RAMs, CPUZ screenie.....

[Charles Wirth]

Valid results from Stepping 3 only please.

Also post your SL7xx

Thanks,

[PyroTeknik]

you did say your review would be up tomrrow right fugger?

[Intronic]

I'll post them next week. (3.2C Prescott)

[Tedinde]

got 2.8,3,0 and 3.2 supposed to be here tuesday AM, Place i ordered wont ship till monday.

Hey skate use your spell checker, It's Thread Not Tread, unless you asian. Just a joke!!! Do not bash me!!!!

I'll be posting a hell of a lot of data, you can be assured.

[macci]

these are not mine but I'll post em anyways..

3.2 (ES, steppin3), 1.50V, R404, Superpi8M => 4506MHz, 1.55V,R404,SuperPi 1M => 4644MHz

Its a good start I think

[skate2snow]

looks great! only 1.55Vc! And no 17 multi, i whant to see some 17

[chilly1]

This is to compare a 2.8 prescott to a 2.8 northwood 2.8 prescott will post soon...



http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7511339

This is an es and the processor is not reporting properly..

[skate2snow]

Thats a bit strange results, you should beat me by alot or even if i whould beat you in some not that much!!!!!!

[Blind_GI]

Fugger... where are your results?

All the major hardware sites have posted there reviews... wheres yours? I have seen the stock benches, now I want to see Overlcoked benches. I knew the Prescott was going to suck at stock speeds (it only performs the same as Northwood), but I am curious to see what will happen once we start hitting 4GHz stable on air

[Tedinde]

Give him time. Isnt looking to good at stock speeds MHZ for MHZ comparing to northwood. But something interesting @ anand.

The gap narrows MHZ for MHZ as clock speeds increase.

http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1956&p=24

As you clock the Prescott higher it increases in performance compared to a northwood clock for clock. So going by this @ 3.5ghz and above, the Prescott should pass the northwood on scores MHZ for MHZ.

Hopefully fugger will test this theory. I shall tuesday.

This is the first time i have not seen any overclocked benchies, From 8 different sites. Some Xfiles stuff going on here??

Good thing is, Prescott is driving P4 prices down across the board. Cept for EE's of course.

[skate2snow]

you meen if we compare 3.4NW vs 3.4Prescott the NW will win, but if we OC the two at 4GHz the Prescott will win?

[bh2k]

yep, only for high clocks, which is what I expected. This should do well for people who run at 4.2ghz 24/7, but bad for stock.

[macci]

Tedinde, I was just about to post that
Its rather interesting 'feature'.

And it actually seems to work like that.

Some SuperPi 8M numbers we can use to compare em:

NW @4.8GHz (300x16 5:4 2-2-2-5) = 5min 34sec
Prescott @4.5GHz (281.5x16 5:4 2-2-2-5) = 5min 33sec

So at those clocks that Prescott can beat the NW which is running 300MHz higher and has 15MHz higher RAM speed! Its getting rather close to P4EE performance levels there...

[freecableguy]

I think I am going to order a 2.8E and a 3.2E and test this out with an IC7-MAX3 bios 1.4. I have a WC setup that I just moved too and expect good things! Hopefully one of these CPUs will take me to 4GHz+!!

[Blind_GI]

Yes I saw that as well... the higher clocks Prescott gets the better it performs (in comparison to NW's). If you look at it a 3.4 Prescott scores more (comparitivley) then a 3.2 Prescott when comparing the NW counterpart.

And with 4.0GHz with stock volts on air we can expect a big yield in performance over northwoods at the same clocks.

[Tedinde]

Originally posted by skate2snow
you meen if we compare 3.4NW vs 3.4Prescott the NW will win, but if we OC the two at 4GHz the Prescott will win?

Yes skate. What's driving me crazy is no OC'd bench numbers.

All im seeing is stock speeds everywhere. probably 8 reviews so far.

Im hoping fugger will drop the hammer on them all soon. So far it's not cheering me up about the 3 prescotts i ordered, until ready anands article.

Not liking the heat factor either. Might have to sell one in a vapo complete, and go to a mach1 Modded.

[freecableguy]

Tedinde - we're in this together! I got a 2.8E and 3.2E from PCPROGRESS next day UPS on the way! Should be here Tuesday. We will both be happy or pissed off together!

-kris

[Intronic]

My 2.8E should be here tuesday too, hope to get some nice results

[Kanavit]

will 90nm help make Prescott ramp higher frequency? or not. because it seems it will need to.

[skate2snow]

Its help alot, but blocking the Vc a bit

[doctorcod]

Originally posted by skate2snow
Its help alot, but blocking the Vc a bit

supposedly it dosnt allow over 1.6v, but then again aren't there motherboards that are going to allow you to surpass that?

[nailbomb]

Where are Fuggers numbers? I haven't had time to read all the threads today yet.

[Tedinde]

Originally posted by freecableguy
Tedinde - we're in this together! I got a 2.8E and 3.2E from PCPROGRESS next day UPS on the way! Should be here Tuesday. We will both be happy or pissed off together!

-kris

Mine from Spartantech, the same company, Kinda seems illegal same address!!!

I'll meet you there if they dont show up pissed off!!! Just kidding.

What im hoping for is everyone is reviewing ES review samples, month old at least, Retail versions will hopefully be a newer revision stepping from those, and maybe run cooler.

I read somewhere that "fry's" has them ready to be put out. Hopefully some one will have them tomorrow to give us something to read.

[Tedinde]

Originally posted by nailbomb
Where are Fuggers numbers? I haven't had time to read all the threads today yet.

Give him time. reviews arent as easy as you think as "forum reviews" Spell one thing wrong and you get laughed at by the whole world!!! Even with a 5ghz CPU!!!