SPi 1M = fail
wP 32M = fail
benches that speed up with processing power are transient at best. IMHO both of those benches have had their time.
SPi 1M = fail
wP 32M = fail
benches that speed up with processing power are transient at best. IMHO both of those benches have had their time.
Originally Posted by T_M
______
Sometimes, it's not your time. Sometimes, you have to make it your time. Sometimes, it can ONLY be your time.
lol. Anyone who is a true computer enthusiast will look at more benchmarks than just superpi. That and you'd know that superpi is also dependent on CPU caching. Obvious intel's chips would do better. Look at other benchmarks for a more objective idea of how a chip performs.
Interesting tech article though.
-----------------Main Setup-----------------
Processor: Intel C2D E4600ES @ 3.4 Ghz
Motherboard: Abit AW9D-Max
Heatsink: Cooler Master GeminII HSF
Graphics Card: eVGA 6800GS 515//1320 (hacked SLI)
RAM: 2x 1Gb GeIL Ultra UDCA= DDR2 800Mhz cas 4
RAM: 2x 1Gb Crucial Tenth Anniversary DDR2 667Mhz cas 3
Hard Drive (Primary): 1 x 200Gb Seagate EIDE
Hard Drive (Secondary): 1 x Seagate 160GB SATA
Hard Drive (Secondary): 1 x Seagate 300Gb SATAII
DVD-RW Drive: 1 x Lite-on CD-RW/DVD-RW
Power Supply: Antec Basiq 500W
Great reading, and I'm on your side, reading those 4 pages there was VERY little that didn't made sense to me.
No really, what is scary is I actually understood a fair amount of that
SuperPI is only fun to run just to check your score, and by increasing speeds and/ore decreasing latencies you can quickly check your new score.
It's fun for a personal pov and eventually to see, in this case, how Deneb improved from Agena. Then still the results, and especially the actual context of that result, is very questionable... very.
Or to go short, the program is useless in 99.99% of the times. And of course AMD users use this tool as well, it still ain't a legit way to decide that Intel is any better than AMD or any other stupid comparison. It's almost like NASA benching their server clusters vs IBM with 3DMark01, the result tells nothing of how the actual server clusters perform or what so ever.
Synaptic Overflow
CPU:
-Intel Core i7 920 3841A522
--CPU: 4200Mhz| Vcore: +120mV| Uncore: 3200Mhz| VTT: +100mV| Turbo: On| HT: Off
---CPU block: EK Supreme Acetal| Radiator: TCF X-Changer 480mm
Motherboard:
-Foxconn Bloodrage P06
--Blck: 200Mhz| QPI: 3600Mhz
Graphics:
-Sapphire Radeon HD 4870X2
--GPU: 750Mhz| GDDR: 900Mhz
RAM:
-3x 2GB Mushkin XP3-12800
--Mhz: 800Mhz| Vdimm: 1.65V| Timings: 7-8-7-20-1T
Storage:
-3Ware 9650SE-2LP RAID controller
--2x Western Digital 74GB Raptor RAID 0
PSU:
-Enermax Revolution 85+ 1250W
OS:
-Windows Vista Business x64
ORDERED: Sapphire HD 5970 OC
LOOKING FOR: 2x G.Skill Falcon II 128GB SSD, Windows 7
Cleaning the thread, re-open for business in a few minutes.
edit - re-opened.
All posts by Chad Boga removed, all replies removed.
Last edited by STEvil; 11-17-2008 at 07:28 PM.
All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.
I almost forgot what we are talking about here...Back on topic shal we
~1~
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
GigaByte X570 AORUS LITE
Trident-Z 3200 CL14 16GB
AMD Radeon VII
~2~
AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper 2950x
Asus Prime X399-A
GSkill Flare-X 3200mhz, CAS14, 64GB
AMD RX 5700 XT
Thanks, Mr Evil! It kinda wobbled off track.
You're my hero
Awesome to take a bit of time to clean it up
Synaptic Overflow
CPU:
-Intel Core i7 920 3841A522
--CPU: 4200Mhz| Vcore: +120mV| Uncore: 3200Mhz| VTT: +100mV| Turbo: On| HT: Off
---CPU block: EK Supreme Acetal| Radiator: TCF X-Changer 480mm
Motherboard:
-Foxconn Bloodrage P06
--Blck: 200Mhz| QPI: 3600Mhz
Graphics:
-Sapphire Radeon HD 4870X2
--GPU: 750Mhz| GDDR: 900Mhz
RAM:
-3x 2GB Mushkin XP3-12800
--Mhz: 800Mhz| Vdimm: 1.65V| Timings: 7-8-7-20-1T
Storage:
-3Ware 9650SE-2LP RAID controller
--2x Western Digital 74GB Raptor RAID 0
PSU:
-Enermax Revolution 85+ 1250W
OS:
-Windows Vista Business x64
ORDERED: Sapphire HD 5970 OC
LOOKING FOR: 2x G.Skill Falcon II 128GB SSD, Windows 7
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks