Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 33

Thread: How did AMD get to 45nm without HKMG?

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    NorCal
    Posts
    150

    How did AMD get to 45nm without HKMG?

    I was interested in what improvements were made to Deneb/Shanghai in order to get increased performance at lower power.....so a'Googlin I went. Found this link to a pretty decent article that goes beyond the regurgitated tripe found on most 'news' sites.

    http://www.eetimes.eu/semi/212002481...RSKH0CJUNN2JVN

    Don't let your head explode!

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,476
    Quote Originally Posted by RiverRicer View Post
    I was interested in what improvements were made to Deneb/Shanghai in order to get increased performance at lower power.....so a'Googlin I went. Found this link to a pretty decent article that goes beyond the regurgitated tripe found on most 'news' sites.

    http://www.eetimes.eu/semi/212002481...RSKH0CJUNN2JVN

    Don't let your head explode!
    *Shrug* Ask IBM?
    i3 2100, MSI H61M-E33. 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws.
    MSI GTX 460 Twin Frozr II. 1TB Caviar Blue.
    Corsair HX 620, CM 690, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    NorCal
    Posts
    150
    Quote Originally Posted by Glow9 View Post
    *Shrug* Ask IBM?
    No doubt, since they are partnered.
    I was more interested in what changes were made to the transistor structure.

  4. #4
    Xtremely High Voltage Sparky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    16,040


    No really, what is scary is I actually understood a fair amount of that
    The Cardboard Master
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by SparkyJJO View Post


    No really, what is scary is I actually understood a fair amount of that

    Congratulations. You're now one-thousand times more eminently qualified to run your own hardware review site than Kyle Bennett.

  6. #6
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside an AS355F2
    Posts
    414
    DFM has a lot to do with it. AMD decided it wasn't needed at 65nm where intel thought it was. The results speak for themselves, now look at what it has done for 45nm.

    I would love to see the FO4 numbers, I think they will have dropped substantially.

    User9498 That was priceless.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,330
    AMD wins another one.

    To everyone that says that AMD is behind, look at the resources available, and then look at what they produce. Then, if you're not sold, look at their relative sizes.

    Besides, articles like this warm the les of my heart.

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Posts
    27
    Quote Originally Posted by RiverRicer View Post
    I was interested in what improvements were made to Deneb/Shanghai in order to get increased performance at lower power.....so a'Googlin I went. Found this link to a pretty decent article that goes beyond the regurgitated tripe found on most 'news' sites.

    http://www.eetimes.eu/semi/212002481...RSKH0CJUNN2JVN

    Don't let your head explode!
    I liked this bit:

    Providing opinion on who is better when it comes to something as complicated as a multicore microprocessor is a guessing game at best.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,476
    Quote Originally Posted by Chad Boga View Post
    What are all these wins of AMD's that you allude to?
    Yeah I love AMD and all but I haven't seen them win a battle in a while. Battles are won by sales and I have to say that chunk they bit out of Intel a few years back was lost. Fortunately in terms of ATI I'd say theres a battle just won recently.
    i3 2100, MSI H61M-E33. 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws.
    MSI GTX 460 Twin Frozr II. 1TB Caviar Blue.
    Corsair HX 620, CM 690, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit.

  10. #10
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    247
    I tried reading that article, after about the 3rd page my brain was in a meltdown, it just became meaningless words at that point :P

    Core 2 Duo(Conroe) was based on the Intel Core Duo(Yonah) which was based on the Pentium M(Banias) which was based on the Pentium III(Coppermine).

    Core 2 Duo is a Pentium III on meth.

  11. #11
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    529
    Quote Originally Posted by Glow9 View Post
    Yeah I love AMD and all but I haven't seen them win a battle in a while.
    There's battles of performance, and price/performance.

  12. #12
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    202
    Very interesting.

    Thanks for the read.

    It made me wonder whether we really need competition in the market. It's obviously evident that most of the research money that has gone towards these engineering processes must have come from income taxes and other taxes of people around the world.

    Do we really need this much power now? So that users can have 99% uptime on their mission critical search engine :banana::banana::banana::banana:ography queries? And so that governments can set up huge data harvesting warehouses?

    To be honest, I would have been happy with a good optimized dual core Dothan, as we've anyways seen that most optimizations have come from better communication busses, and not pure processing power.

    Coupled with that that programmers would have been held responsible for their bloated software (Cough *microsoft* cough *linux too*), more programmers would have been employed, and thus more people would be able to afford adequate technologies for their purposes.

    What you have here instead are systems and platforms which will always cost a fortune, with only financial respite coming from the fact that they or their platforms will be manufactured under slave labor.

    *clap clap* A huge modern accomplishment for the "evolved man".

    /rant

  13. #13
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,550
    what a rant by mockingbird... pfff
    Adobe is working on Flash Player support for 64-bit platforms as part of our ongoing commitment to the cross-platform compatibility of Flash Player. We expect to provide native support for 64-bit platforms in an upcoming release of Flash Player following the release of Flash Player 10.1.

  14. #14
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Karachi, Pakistan
    Posts
    389
    Quote Originally Posted by mockingbird View Post
    bla bla bla
    www.apple.com I think you are looking for this.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  15. #15
    Xtremely High Voltage Sparky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    16,040
    Quote Originally Posted by mockingbird View Post
    Very interesting.

    Thanks for the read.

    It made me wonder whether we really need competition in the market. It's obviously evident that most of the research money that has gone towards these engineering processes must have come from income taxes and other taxes of people around the world.

    *snip*

    Coupled with that that programmers would have been held responsible for their bloated software (Cough *microsoft* cough *linux too*), more programmers would have been employed, and thus more people would be able to afford adequate technologies for their purposes.*snip*
    You are forgetting something - No competition means the only guy calls the shots on the prices, so no, more people couldn't afford the technologies, rather fewer would That dothan you referred to would very possibly be a premium chip to be had for $500+ if it was a one player field

    Competition keeps both parties honest... well, sort of anyway, they can't go too far off the deep end at least.
    The Cardboard Master
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64

  16. #16
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    202
    Quote Originally Posted by SparkyJJO View Post
    You are forgetting something - No competition means the only guy calls the shots on the prices, so no, more people couldn't afford the technologies, rather fewer would That dothan you referred to would very possibly be a premium chip to be had for $500+ if it was a one player field

    Competition keeps both parties honest... well, sort of anyway, they can't go too far off the deep end at least.
    I also used to think that but it's not true. I've seen this argument being used before but I've now come to realize that instead of taxes being used to fund the R&D of one monolith it is noe being used to fund the redundant research of two.

    Prices of CPUs would have come down regardless of whether there was a competing company because demand would have grown so high due to demand, just as the price for harddrives have fallen because of demand from data warehouses.

  17. #17
    Xtremely High Voltage Sparky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    16,040
    Not really.

    Prices would come down eventually yes, but they certainly wouldn't be as cheap as they are now. Why would they, if intel could sell a P4 for $300 because that is all there is, why wouldn't they?

    And show me proof that our tax dollars are being used by intel/AMD for research?

    *edit* actually don't. Let's not derail the thread please.
    The Cardboard Master
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64

  18. #18
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    202
    Quote Originally Posted by SparkyJJO View Post
    Not really.

    Prices would come down eventually yes, but they certainly wouldn't be as cheap as they are now. Why would they, if intel could sell a P4 for $300 because that is all there is, why wouldn't they?

    And show me proof that our tax dollars are being used by intel/AMD for research?

    *edit* actually don't. Let's not derail the thread please.
    Intel could never charge $300 for a P4 because Willamette was slower than even Katmai never mind Coppermine or Tualatin in its initial release.

    Like I said. Breakthroughs came with DDR technology, Dual channel memory, better chipsets, faster GPUs.

  19. #19
    Xtremely High Voltage Sparky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    16,040
    Yes they could have with no competition. I wasn't talking necessarily about initial release.

    But like I said, let's not clutter the thread with this off topic stuff.
    The Cardboard Master
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64

  20. #20
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    good work AMD.
    HAVE NO FEAR!
    "AMD fallen angel"
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamekiller View Post
    You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.

  21. #21
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    Quote Originally Posted by mockingbird View Post
    Very interesting.

    Thanks for the read.

    It made me wonder whether we really need competition in the market. It's obviously evident that most of the research money that has gone towards these engineering processes must have come from income taxes and other taxes of people around the world.

    Do we really need this much power now? So that users can have 99% uptime on their mission critical search engine :banana::banana::banana::banana:ography queries? And so that governments can set up huge data harvesting warehouses?

    To be honest, I would have been happy with a good optimized dual core Dothan, as we've anyways seen that most optimizations have come from better communication busses, and not pure processing power.

    Coupled with that that programmers would have been held responsible for their bloated software (Cough *microsoft* cough *linux too*), more programmers would have been employed, and thus more people would be able to afford adequate technologies for their purposes.

    What you have here instead are systems and platforms which will always cost a fortune, with only financial respite coming from the fact that they or their platforms will be manufactured under slave labor.

    *clap clap* A huge modern accomplishment for the "evolved man".

    /rant
    You're kidding, right? Nothing in that article suggests the money is coming from the poor like you're making it out. It focuses squarely on the technology. Also, as a programmer and network administrator by trade, I have to say your bloated software conspiracy is pretty weak sauce.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  22. #22
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    EvE-Online, Tranquility
    Posts
    1,978
    -quote removed - STEvil

    Quote Originally Posted by mockingbird View Post
    Very interesting.

    Thanks for the read.

    It made me wonder whether we really need competition in the market. It's obviously evident that most of the research money that has gone towards these engineering processes must have come from income taxes and other taxes of people around the world.

    Do we really need this much power now? So that users can have 99% uptime on their mission critical search engine :banana::banana::banana::banana:ography queries? And so that governments can set up huge data harvesting warehouses?

    To be honest, I would have been happy with a good optimized dual core Dothan, as we've anyways seen that most optimizations have come from better communication busses, and not pure processing power.

    Coupled with that that programmers would have been held responsible for their bloated software (Cough *microsoft* cough *linux too*), more programmers would have been employed, and thus more people would be able to afford adequate technologies for their purposes.

    What you have here instead are systems and platforms which will always cost a fortune, with only financial respite coming from the fact that they or their platforms will be manufactured under slave labor.

    *clap clap* A huge modern accomplishment for the "evolved man".

    /rant
    Wut... So is this a rant against taxes? Against pr0n? Against slave labor? Against money? I mean, wake up, we all need those things anyways. Although I can live without pr0n, but for the rest everyone needs that otherwise we wouldnt be anywhere.

    Or we can go back living in trees and playing CSS RL
    Last edited by STEvil; 11-17-2008 at 07:17 PM.
    Synaptic Overflow

    CPU:
    -Intel Core i7 920 3841A522
    --CPU: 4200Mhz| Vcore: +120mV| Uncore: 3200Mhz| VTT: +100mV| Turbo: On| HT: Off
    ---CPU block: EK Supreme Acetal| Radiator: TCF X-Changer 480mm
    Motherboard:
    -Foxconn Bloodrage P06
    --Blck: 200Mhz| QPI: 3600Mhz
    Graphics:
    -Sapphire Radeon HD 4870X2
    --GPU: 750Mhz| GDDR: 900Mhz
    RAM:
    -3x 2GB Mushkin XP3-12800
    --Mhz: 800Mhz| Vdimm: 1.65V| Timings: 7-8-7-20-1T
    Storage:
    -3Ware 9650SE-2LP RAID controller
    --2x Western Digital 74GB Raptor RAID 0
    PSU:
    -Enermax Revolution 85+ 1250W
    OS:
    -Windows Vista Business x64


    ORDERED: Sapphire HD 5970 OC
    LOOKING FOR: 2x G.Skill Falcon II 128GB SSD, Windows 7

  23. #23
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    657
    Quote Originally Posted by Rammsteiner View Post
    You know, it's actually tireing me to understand the simplistic nonsense.

    Anyway, lets put it this way. They do not win in SuperPI, but their technology is quite good, and with improving their older technology they've done a nice step forward which shows with Deneb.
    Sai WUT?

    Come ON! If you don't win Super-Pi you might as well pack it up and go buy an e-Machines computer or a Packard Bell.

    (Actually the idea of super-pi being important is just as valid as the idea of adding together the percentage losses/gains from a bunch of benchmarks and pretending you have something that actually means something.)
    FX-8350, Powercolor ATI R9 290X LCS, OCZ Vertex 4, Crosshair V Forumula-Z, AMD Radeon DDR3-2133 2x8Gb, Corsair HX1000W, Thermaltake Xaser VI, Xonar D2X, Water Cooling 140.3

  24. #24
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    superPI sucks :P

    particle's "Generic CPU bench" is Much Better.
    HAVE NO FEAR!
    "AMD fallen angel"
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamekiller View Post
    You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.

  25. #25
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    northern ireland
    Posts
    1,008
    SuperPi is used far more nowadays by people on a "All Intel is good for is superPi" rant used in the form of a "Anyway, lets put it this way,They do not win in SuperPI, but their technology is quite good" , "mainly because they all play SuperPi all day long brother LOL" , "We have a launch even today for i7 and I bet they show SuperPi there...as if in the whole scale of things it friggin matters" , "mainly because they all play SuperPi all day long brother LOL (OMFG).....I think my E-PENIS just Grew ....SuPerPi ...FTW" comment.

    In fact, I cannot remember the last time I heard someone profess Intel dominance over an AMD cpu based on the results of this bench, Yet it is strangely important to some people that always seem to use it in a derogatory context. Any hobby psychologists wanna take a stab as to why?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •