Results 1 to 25 of 75

Thread: Shanghai can now be purchased!

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by Titan7171 View Post
    so because of all these reasons you could say that Opterons are kinda krippled just to be server stable.

    well between the memory increase going from 667/800 to 1066 for Deneb, the clock for clock increase, the increase in total clocks (2.7 vs 3.0ghz) + overclocking we should see very nice increases overall
    there where benchmarks done with Barcelona and 8800 GTX on a sever with 677mhz ECC.

    http://www.anandtech.com/printarticle.aspx?i=3092

    it us to have a 3dmark numbers too. :/

    I think it scored around 9,00 points and a phenom scored around 9,800 10,250.
    HAVE NO FEAR!
    "AMD fallen angel"
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamekiller View Post
    You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.

  2. #2
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,260
    The TDP is only 75w I wonder what stock vcore is for these CPUs

    Wonder what kind of speeds they would get out of a 140w Deneb
    --->TeamPURE<---

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    288
    Quote Originally Posted by knopflerbruce View Post
    The TDP is only 75w I wonder what stock vcore is for these CPUs

    Wonder what kind of speeds they would get out of a 140w Deneb

    I believe that the 75W number is actually for ACP so true TDP is something like 110W or something like that.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hungary (EU)
    Posts
    1,376
    Quote Originally Posted by qurious63ss View Post
    I believe that the 75W number is actually for ACP so true TDP is something like 110W or something like that.
    105W ACP = 125W TDP
    75W ACP = 95W TDP
    55W ACP = 68W TDP

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    288
    Quote Originally Posted by Oliverda View Post
    105W ACP = 125W TDP
    75W ACP = 95W TDP
    55W ACP = 68W TDP
    I found this from AMD and they have it broken down like this.

    ACP TDP(max power)
    105W = 137W
    75W = 115W
    55W = 79W

    http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/cont...61C_ACP_WP.pdf

  6. #6
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,260
    Quote Originally Posted by qurious63ss View Post
    I believe that the 75W number is actually for ACP so true TDP is something like 110W or something like that.
    My bad, I just read the numbers
    --->TeamPURE<---

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside an AS355F2
    Posts
    414
    Quote Originally Posted by qurious63ss View Post
    I believe that the 75W number is actually for ACP so true TDP is something like 110W or something like that.
    Unless something has changed recently AMD always rate their processors by TDP. ACP is just there to give a comparison with intel as that's how intel rate their processors.

    I am almost certain that you have this backwards.

    Barcelona are certainly rated by TDP so if Shanghai are rated with ACP then that makes them worse than Barcelona and that definitely isn't the case.
    EDIT:
    Actually the more I think about it the more certain I am that you have this wrong. My 9950 is a 140w TDP model yet it is around 100w in reality, so if that 140w was ACP then the TDP would be what, around 200w. Sorry but there isn't a motherboard PWM that can handle that.

    KTE looked right into this not long ago and came out with some astonishing findings.

    EDIT I'm now confused myself as to what is going on with TDP vs ACP so I have asked AMD to clear this up for me, so I will update as soon as I have my answer..(see post #62)
    Last edited by Aussie FX; 11-13-2008 at 06:53 AM.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    northern ireland
    Posts
    1,008
    Quote Originally Posted by Aussie FX View Post
    that's how intel rate their processors.
    Is this actually true today or are you talking about the pentium 4 still?

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside an AS355F2
    Posts
    414
    Quote Originally Posted by gallag View Post
    Is this actually true today or are you talking about the pentium 4 still?
    As I understand it they are using average figures not absolute worse case scenario.

    However I wouldn't bet my life on it and I'm happy to be proven wrong.

    Also don't forget that intel rate their processors in "families" so it's now getting very confusing...On both sides.
    Last edited by Aussie FX; 11-13-2008 at 06:08 AM. Reason: Addition.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •