Results 1 to 25 of 317

Thread: Deneb just around the corner?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    746
    Quote Originally Posted by Yukon Trooper View Post
    Does anybody know the overall speed increase of C2D over Barcelona clock for clock? I know I am making a very rough estimate, but I'd like to put some kind of numbers in my head.
    There was a thread about this a while back..someone did a Q6600 up against a 9950, or 9850, can't remember, but clock-for-clock, the Q6600 had an average 5% advantage. This was over a wide range of games/benchmarks.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    3,119
    Quote Originally Posted by ryboto View Post
    There was a thread about this a while back..someone did a Q6600 up against a 9950, or 9850, can't remember, but clock-for-clock, the Q6600 had an average 5% advantage. This was over a wide range of games/benchmarks.
    "Source Techreport.com"
    On a game where Multi core is a plus.. the 9750 (2.4ghz) best the q6600, but in the other screenies.. you can see the 9950 has a swap of performace lead with the 65nm Intel..and it has a 200mhz advantage..So Deneb will need a good bit of improvement to best 45nm Intel..But I can see this being easier to do since it will finally have enough cache to help.







    ~1~
    AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
    GigaByte X570 AORUS LITE
    Trident-Z 3200 CL14 16GB
    AMD Radeon VII
    ~2~
    AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper 2950x
    Asus Prime X399-A
    GSkill Flare-X 3200mhz, CAS14, 64GB
    AMD RX 5700 XT

  3. #3
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    746
    Quote Originally Posted by charged3800z24 View Post
    "Source Techreport.com"
    On a game where Multi core is a plus.. the 9750 (2.4ghz) best the q6600, but in the other screenies.. you can see the 9950 has a swap of performace lead with the 65nm Intel..and it has a 200mhz advantage..So Deneb will need a good bit of improvement to best 45nm Intel..But I can see this being easier to do since it will finally have enough cache to help.
    I wasn't referring to a review site, I was referring to the work a user here did. He collected a bunch of benchmark results, compiled the results, in the end, clock for clock, there was a 5% difference overall.

    edit: and games don't tell the whole story.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    3,119
    Quote Originally Posted by ryboto View Post
    I wasn't referring to a review site, I was referring to the work a user here did. He collected a bunch of benchmark results, compiled the results, in the end, clock for clock, there was a 5% difference overall.

    edit: and games don't tell the whole story.
    I know.. I was showing that in games where scaling is involved the phenom was on top.. but other wise is wasn't.. Deneb will need to pick up some serious ground to complete with 45nm Intel....You can also look at the chart and see in those games..The 45nm Intel chips had a good boost over the 65nm...although cache siaze etc play a role, but nothing is breath taking.. Deneb will need a lil more boost.. and hopefully those other imporvements being discussed here and there, will be enough to help get there.
    ~1~
    AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
    GigaByte X570 AORUS LITE
    Trident-Z 3200 CL14 16GB
    AMD Radeon VII
    ~2~
    AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper 2950x
    Asus Prime X399-A
    GSkill Flare-X 3200mhz, CAS14, 64GB
    AMD RX 5700 XT

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •