MMM
Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast
Results 126 to 150 of 171

Thread: New version OCCT stability test

  1. #126
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    2,788
    Quote Originally Posted by Tetedeiench View Post
    Thanks

    I'll try to give a shot at finding dead pixels in fullscreen mode. Maybe it'll :
    1- make the driver switch to 3d mode
    2- use all the GPUs

    However, it'll take me some time to achieve, as i'm deep into the new user interface of 3.0.0 as of now, and i don't want to leave that until finished. Be sure i'll be posting here once i do it to see how your config behaves
    Yeah that sounds great! And you can still use a low resolution in full screen, the same as it is windowed.
    Asus Rampage II Gene | Core i7 920 | 6*2GB Mushkin 998729 | BFG GTX280 OCX | Auzentech X-Fi Forte | Corsair VX550
    —Life is too short to be bound by the moral, ethical and legal constraints imposed on us by modern day society.

  2. #127
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1
    I'm using OCCT GPU v0.41 and was wondering what "Coef:xx" means.

  3. #128
    Xtreme Mentor stasio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    3,036
    OCCT 2.0.1-13.10.2008



    .EXE FILE
    .ZIP FILE
    Last edited by stasio; 10-14-2008 at 10:00 PM.
    Need a Gigabyte latest BIOS?
    Z370 AORUS Gaming 7,
    GA-Z97X-SOC Force ,Core i7-4790K @ 4.9 GHz
    GA-Z87X-UD3H ,Core i7-4770K @ 4.65 GHz
    G.Skill F3-2933C12D-8GTXDG @ 3100 (12-15-14-35-CR1) @1.66V
    2xSSD Corsair Force GS 128 (RAID 0), WD Caviar Black SATA3 1TB HDD,
    Evga GTS 450 SC, Gigabyte Superb 720W
    XSPC RayStorm D5 EX240 (Liquid Ultra)
    NZXT Phantom 630 Ultra Tower
    Win 7 SP1 x64;Win 10 x64

  4. #129
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    C:\Philippines\TPC
    Posts
    1,525
    thanks stasio for the update!

  5. #130
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by TunedFish View Post
    I'm using OCCT GPU v0.41 and was wondering what "Coef:xx" means.
    It's the complexity. The higher the coef, the higher the complexity. I use this parameter to adjust the frames calculated per second, as no known CPU can check 200 frames per second to see if there's any error. That would mean checking 200*512*512 pixels, which is truly... enormous. I had to find a way around that issue.

  6. #131
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by stasio View Post
    OCCT 2.0.1-13.10.2008



    .EXE FILE
    .ZIP FILE
    Faster than me

  7. #132
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    67
    Thanks Tetedeiench!
    Keep up the great work
    E8600
    GA X48-DS4
    4GB OCZ Platinum LV-1150
    2x Samsung F3 500GB RAID0
    PCS+ AX5870
    LG W2600H-PF
    Lian Li A16B
    Win7 Pro x64

  8. #133
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by gymenii View Post
    Thanks Tetedeiench!
    Keep up the great work
    ^^;

    As i said, i'm working on 3.0.0. I spent 8 hours on it today, mostly on the interface. I can tell you what OCCT PT 3.0.0 will add :
    * 2 CPU tests : the regular OCCT and one based on Intel's Linpack libraries
    * 1 GPU test (the one you currently know) with error checking (and yes, i'll try to do that in fullscreen mode)... or pure burn
    * 1 GPU memory test written in CUDA (similar to MemTest86, but for Graphic cards)
    * 1 Power Supply test (which is OCCT CPU Test + GPU test)
    * New interface (will have some common traits with the old one though, but it had to be modified to comply with all the tests i'm introducing recently

    I've already worked about 3 months on that (GPU test and CUDA took a long, long time), i expect i still have about 2 months of work, but it should be ready soon enough

  9. #134
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    [M] - Belgium
    Posts
    1,744
    very much appreciate your work Tetedeiench, looking forward to Linpack integration
    the GPU tests are very interesting too, a load test ALA CPU will definitely be put to good use by many


    Belgium's #1 Hardware Review Site and OC-Team!

  10. #135
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    2,780
    This program is sounding like a beast! Definitely have some amazing additions lined up. Thanks soo much for all your time and effort in coding this amazing app for us. I have been using it for years, and though I am done clocking my current system I look forward to giving the new version a try when it's released.
    Silverstone Temjin TJ-09BW w/ Silverstone DA750
    Asus P8P67
    2600K w/ Thermalright Venomous X Black w/ Sanyo Denki San Ace 109R1212H1011
    8GB G.Skill DDR-1600 7-8-7-24
    Gigabyte GTX 460 1G
    Modded Creative X-Fi Fatal1ty w/ Klipsch Promedia 2.1
    1 X 120GB OCZ Vertex
    1 X 300GB WD Velociraptor HLFS
    1 X Hitachi 7K1000 1TB
    Pioneer DVR-216L DVD-RW
    Windows 7 Ultimate 64


    Quote Originally Posted by alexio View Post
    From the hip and aim at the kitchen if she doesn't approve your purchases. She'll know better next time.

  11. #136
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1,176
    using OCCT 2.1.0.b05 on vista x64 Q9650 and I'm getting an error after 1minute duo to a ripple in voltage drops of barely .5volts. Crashed Code 1

  12. #137
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by Think View Post
    using OCCT 2.1.0.b05 on vista x64 Q9650 and I'm getting an error after 1minute duo to a ripple in voltage drops of barely .5volts. Crashed Code 1
    Sorry for the long reply delay.

    The Crash code 1 is always accompanied by a code 4 somewhere. Code 1 just means that the thread stopped because another thread reported an error. This is due to the behaviour of OCCT i wanted : one error detected on a core = we stop everything. Code 4 means an error was detected, that the result computed was different than the one expected.

    It should be much more explicit on 3.0.0.

    I have to say i'm really busy these days with 3.0, and that i'm getting closer every day to release. There's still some way to go before beta1 though. I'd say it should be out within a month.

  13. #138
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Potosi, Missouri
    Posts
    2,296
    Quote Originally Posted by Tetedeiench View Post
    I have to say i'm really busy these days with 3.0, and that i'm getting closer every day to release. There's still some way to go before beta1 though. I'd say it should be out within a month.
    Looking forward to it.

  14. #139
    Xtreme Mentor dengyong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    A great place again
    Posts
    2,589
    Quote Originally Posted by Tetedeiench View Post
    I have to say i'm really busy these days with 3.0, and that i'm getting closer every day to release. There's still some way to go before beta1 though. I'd say it should be out within a month.
    In all versions so far,5v and 12v are incorrect when using the evga 790i ftw.

    Great test, thanks for all your hard work.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	voltage.jpg 
Views:	1179 
Size:	56.2 KB 
ID:	88229

  15. #140
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Europe/Slovenia/Ljubljana
    Posts
    1,540


    This latest thing is broken. CPU usage percentage is all borked up (just look the image). And also doesn't seem to kick CPU to full speed. Instead it's "idling" in power saving state (1,8GHz instead at full 3,7GHz).
    Intel Core i7 920 4 GHz | 18 GB DDR3 1600 MHz | ASUS Rampage II Gene | GIGABYTE HD7950 3GB WindForce 3X | WD Caviar Black 2TB | Creative Sound Blaster Z | Altec Lansing MX5021 | Corsair HX750 | Lian Li PC-V354
    Super silent cooling powered by (((Noiseblocker)))

  16. #141
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by RejZoR View Post


    This latest thing is broken. CPU usage percentage is all borked up (just look the image). And also doesn't seem to kick CPU to full speed. Instead it's "idling" in power saving state (1,8GHz instead at full 3,7GHz).
    That's because you enabled Power saving features, that reduce your CPU speed when it's idling.

    OCCT displays the real frequency of your CPU. You should see it kick up once the test is started, and the "real" one is recorded in the graphs

    Everybody else > Thanks for your cheers

  17. #142
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Europe/Slovenia/Ljubljana
    Posts
    1,540
    Erm, no. Last version 2.0.0a kicked in from power saving state to full throttle just fine. This one just stays in power saving mode even after the testing actually starts.
    Default clock is for processors original clock, CPU clock is the actual current clock which always reflects the current clock, even when changing power saving states.
    I even checked the CPU cycles with perfmonitor and it was showing 3750 cycles (menaing 3750MHz) while OCCT was showing 1800MHz clock (like on image above).
    Intel Core i7 920 4 GHz | 18 GB DDR3 1600 MHz | ASUS Rampage II Gene | GIGABYTE HD7950 3GB WindForce 3X | WD Caviar Black 2TB | Creative Sound Blaster Z | Altec Lansing MX5021 | Corsair HX750 | Lian Li PC-V354
    Super silent cooling powered by (((Noiseblocker)))

  18. #143
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by RejZoR View Post
    Erm, no. Last version 2.0.0a kicked in from power saving state to full throttle just fine. This one just stays in power saving mode even after the testing actually starts.
    Default clock is for processors original clock, CPU clock is the actual current clock which always reflects the current clock, even when changing power saving states.
    I even checked the CPU cycles with perfmonitor and it was showing 3750 cycles (menaing 3750MHz) while OCCT was showing 1800MHz clock (like on image above).
    Erm, true, my bad.

    It seems the test didn't start though. The CPU usage % is just not right as well. As the test isn't started, the frequency doesn't jump up - there's no need for that.

    I'll look into it ASAP.

  19. #144
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    vermont, yes i like women
    Posts
    1,319
    isnt there an occt gpu test also?

  20. #145
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by philbrown23 View Post
    isnt there an occt gpu test also?
    Yes, and it will be included in v3.0.0 .

    Here's a screenshot of the Beta version of OCCT 3.0 - it's still under development, but the general look is there :



    The next version will include all those tests : OCCT CPU (classic), Linpack (same as IntelBurnTest), OCCT GPU, OCCT memtest (based on CUDA), and a Power supply test (which is really OCCT CPU + GPU at the moment, i have to look into Linpack + OCCT GPU).

    Of course, all those tests come with the features of OCCT (graphs, custom tests, auto tests, and such).

    I'm even thinking about a few new features that i'm pretty sure everybody will like

  21. #146
    Xtreme Mentor dengyong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    A great place again
    Posts
    2,589
    Quote Originally Posted by Tetedeiench View Post
    Yes, and it will be included in v3.0.0 .

    Here's a screenshot of the Beta version of OCCT 3.0 - it's still under development, but the general look is there :

    I'm even thinking about a few new features that i'm pretty sure everybody will like
    Will the new version support the evga 790i FTW ?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	voltage.jpg 
Views:	988 
Size:	56.3 KB 
ID:	88638

  22. #147
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    67
    Quote Originally Posted by Tetedeiench View Post
    Yes, and it will be included in v3.0.0 .

    Here's a screenshot of the Beta version of OCCT 3.0 - it's still under development, but the general look is there :

    I'm even thinking about a few new features that i'm pretty sure everybody will like
    I like it already, looks amazing!
    E8600
    GA X48-DS4
    4GB OCZ Platinum LV-1150
    2x Samsung F3 500GB RAID0
    PCS+ AX5870
    LG W2600H-PF
    Lian Li A16B
    Win7 Pro x64

  23. #148
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Far East
    Posts
    297
    can't wait to have the version 3
    keep up the good work Tetedeiench
    Final-sig.jpg

  24. #149
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by dengyong View Post
    Will the new version support the evga 790i FTW ?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	voltage.jpg 
Views:	988 
Size:	56.3 KB 
ID:	88638
    Most likely

    The voltages are screwed up on the screen on 3.0 because the ini file i used is for test purposes Don't worry, this screenshot is about 2 weeks old, and it's working flawlessly.

    For 2.0.1, as on your screen, you can always tune up the voltages in the options, and select the good sensors if they aren't detected automatically, or screwed up.

    i'll post b01 once it's done here. I expect t to be ready in a week or two...

  25. #150
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    30
    The CUDAMemTest isn't really usefull with my 8800GT,
    it completes the Test at 1170MHz, this is barely stable for a 3DMark, let alone gaming, perhaps more passes (infinite loop) will help

    anyway thanks for OCCT

Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •