More Core i7 trichannel "failure" from "thiefs"

[Shintai]

I call BS on his numbers and you know me well enough that I wouldn't say that lightly.

Most numbers are right. However understanding of the numbers is the issue

People think loading times is frames per second etc.

However, the appearance of the third memory channel created an additional problems.

Running chinese through babelfish is a hard one already. And then randomly guessing charts is even worse.

[Movieman]

Most numbers are right. However understanding of the numbers is the issue

People think loading times is frames per second etc.



Running chinese through babelfish is a hard one already. And then randomly guessing charts is even worse.

Not according to what I see with my own eyes but for the sake of peace on the forum I will stay out of this thread from now on.

[MrToad]

Not according to what I see with my own eyes but for the sake of peace on the forum I will stay out of this thread from now on.

Well, from what I've gathered in a couple of weeks there will be plenty of real world information (which I'm eagerly awaiting) available on the subject, so I have to concur.

No need to start something now, when we are so close to seeing the veil fall...

Besides, you're one whose words can be taken at face value

[naokaji]

Not according to what I see with my own eyes but for the sake of peace on the forum I will stay out of this thread from now on.

A Chinese website compared dual channel s775 vs. tri channel I7.
Among other tests they compared how long games take to load.
So they ended up with lower numbers on I7 than C2Q, because it was seconds and as we all know, less seconds used = better, but some other review sites then just copy pasted, yet failed to realize that the chinese guys where talking about seconds and made fps out of it, which ment that I7 was suddenly looking bad when in fact it was winning.