MMM
Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567
Results 151 to 160 of 160

Thread: AMD Announcing Fab Spin-Off Tomorrow

  1. #151
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by v_rr View Post
    Hector Ruiz is the new President of the foundry company so itīs him that say what to do.

    Also 32nm are on the route. Itīs in the presentation on AMD site.
    Doug Grose is the CEO of the foundry. Hector is a chairman in the foundry.

    There is no president in the foundry.

    The question is if Hector is an executive or non exectutive chairman.
    Last edited by Shintai; 10-12-2008 at 10:02 AM.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  2. #152
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by azraeel101 View Post
    No, they have more money than they can spend and now they want braggin rights. Like, Dubai has all the skyscrapers and all, Bahrain has the F1 circuit, so they want something to brag about too. When they go to Dubai and the local sheik shows them the latest underwater restaurant with sharks as waiters, the Abu Dhabi sheik will say: "so what? See all those laptops and computers you use? I made them. I made the chips, I made the video things, yea, that's right, I iz tha Sultan of Chipz yo! In.your.FACE!!"
    So yea, I think the Arabs care more about being known in the region as having the best technology (think about the fab said to be built in Abu Dhabi) than about profits. I mean, they surely knew AMD has big debts and won't turn really profitable in the short run. So, as I see it, they will rather spend ludicrous amounts of cash to get the best fabrication process than worry about profits.
    If you would know arabs as I do, you would know why I say these things. They are worse than rappers when it comes to flashin and braggin..
    You pointed it out yourself. Look at what the arabs got and what they left behind. Including the majority of the debt and a failing CPU division.

    The arabs focused on the healthy parts.

    This is what they wanted:
    http://www.newglobalfoundry.com/

    Not:
    www.amd.com
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  3. #153
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    Quote Originally Posted by azraeel101 View Post
    No, they have more money than they can spend and now they want braggin rights. Like, Dubai has all the skyscrapers and all, Bahrain has the F1 circuit, so they want something to brag about too. When they go to Dubai and the local sheik shows them the latest underwater restaurant with sharks as waiters, the Abu Dhabi sheik will say: "so what? See all those laptops and computers you use? I made them. I made the chips, I made the video things, yea, that's right, I iz tha Sultan of Chipz yo! In.your.FACE!!"
    So yea, I think the Arabs care more about being known in the region as having the best technology (think about the fab said to be built in Abu Dhabi) than about profits. I mean, they surely knew AMD has big debts and won't turn really profitable in the short run. So, as I see it, they will rather spend ludicrous amounts of cash to get the best fabrication process than worry about profits.
    If you would know arabs as I do, you would know why I say these things. They are worse than rappers when it comes to flashin and braggin..
    hmm i think the same way they aren't interested in money that this company will make for them they are after the fame oil business is enough for them to make ridiculous amount of money

  4. #154
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    City of Lights, The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,381
    Quote Originally Posted by eric66 View Post
    hmm i think the same way they aren't interested in money that this company will make for them they are after the fame oil business is enough for them to make ridiculous amount of money
    This way they are also making sure that they still have a ridiculous amount of money in 100-200 years, as by then they will simply have some share in every imaginable part of the global market. That's their main goal, or at least I think that's their main goal, simply ensure that you will always make money by spreading your risks so to speak.
    "When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman

    Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |

  5. #155
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Thessaloniki, Greece
    Posts
    1,307
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    You pointed it out yourself. Look at what the arabs got and what they left behind. Including the majority of the debt and a failing CPU division.

    The arabs focused on the healthy parts.

    This is what they wanted:
    http://www.newglobalfoundry.com/

    Not:
    www.amd.com
    Will you make up your mind already. A few days ago you were telling us that the foundry couldn't possibly compete with the older more established ones. Now the foundry is the healthy part?
    Seems we made our greatest error when we named it at the start
    for though we called it "Human Nature" - it was cancer of the heart
    CPU: AMD X3 720BE@ 3,4Ghz
    Cooler: Xigmatek S1283(Terrible mounting system for AM2/3)
    Motherboard: Gigabyte 790FXT-UD5P(F4) RAM: 2x 2GB OCZ DDR3 1600Mhz Gold 8-8-8-24
    GPU:HD5850 1GB
    PSU: Seasonic M12D 750W Case: Coolermaster HAF932(aka Dusty )

  6. #156
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by BrowncoatGR View Post
    Will you make up your mind already. A few days ago you were telling us that the foundry couldn't possibly compete with the older more established ones. Now the foundry is the healthy part?
    Do you mean this?

    http://www.xtremesystems.org/Forums/...&postcount=136

    Quote Originally Posted by Eson View Post
    AMD is the Foundry's only customer, of course they will have to listen to AMDs demands.
    Thats only today. If thats the future then the foundry is doomed. They need more customers. Right now AMD only uses 80% of the capacity of FAB36. FAB38 is empty and the foundry wish to build another FAB in NY aswell as tool FAB38. So I really do hope they get other customers...
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  7. #157
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,084
    New 300mm Fab at the Luther Forest Technology Campus, New York

    Construction is expected to begin in 2009 and is expected to be completed in roughly two years, with production beginning in the 2011 timeframe.
    Has I said NY fab will be build and go online very fast because AMD have prepared everything since 2006.
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    And AMD is only a CPU manufactor due to stolen technology and making clones.

  8. #158
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    City of Lights, The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,381
    Quote Originally Posted by v_rr View Post
    Has I said NY fab will be build and go online very fast because AMD have prepared everything since 2006.
    Maybe you should also provide a source to where you got that from...

    You actually claimed that we would have volume production in 2010, so you where off by about 2 years. That quote of yours says that production will begin in 2011, which will equate to volume production in 2012 and that to me is quite a bit later than your 2010 claim.
    "When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman

    Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |

  9. #159
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,084
    Quote Originally Posted by Helmore View Post
    Maybe you should also provide a source to where you got that from...

    You actually claimed that we would have volume production in 2010, so you where off by about 2 years. That quote of yours says that production will begin in 2011, which will equate to volume production in 2012 and that to me is quite a bit later than your 2010 claim.
    http://www.newglobalfoundry.com/techsvcs.aspx

    I never said volume production in 2010.
    The fab starts to build in midle 2009 -> finish build and start producing in midle 2011.

    Actualy I was very accurate because everyone pointed to 3-4=3.5 years and I pointed only to 1.5 years. Missed for 6 months.

    I knew that construction will be very fast because since 2006 the deal is on the works. I was too optimistic by 2010 time frame but still the Fab in NY should be the Home of Buldozer by 2011?

    Are there any probability that Fusion be delayed to be build in Germany when equiped with Bulk 32nm? Initially Fusion was thought to 45nm SOI CPU part and 40nm Bulk GPU part but it can delay to 32 nm Bulk CPU+GPU part.
    Last edited by v_rr; 10-12-2008 at 05:00 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    And AMD is only a CPU manufactor due to stolen technology and making clones.

  10. #160
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    165
    Quote Originally Posted by LOE View Post
    Healthy? AMDs problem is not their failing CPU devision, amd didn't fail design wise but production wise. Just look how much time their fabs needed to make K10 reach K8 clocks. If K10 was able to reach 3.4 Ghz from the start, amd would have never failed, cuz when the first core2 quads launched, 3.2 Ghz was considered good overclock, even now the majority of mainstream Q6600 have a sweet spot of about 3.4 Ghz. Its the fabs that have failed AMD, if their fabs ware better they would never lag so much behind. There was a good chance for AMD to even get back the performance crown with 65nm K10, and stay competitive when intel launched 45nm chips.
    The design is also a bit responsible for the clockspeeds, if they design something with a few hotspots on the chip, and some transistors get a lot hotter then their neighbouring trannies they will not reacht the same frequency. AMD just should add an extra step to the pipeline, allowing higher clocks

Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •