One offtopic question:
How long it takes to make CPU from silicon waffer?
One offtopic question:
How long it takes to make CPU from silicon waffer?
The details of this move are very good for AMD. It is a big help to shoring up it's balance sheet, and now they have stupid investors spending all the money AMD did not have to upgrade their fabs.
What I want to know, is this: Will AMD still have the relations with the new company, like they did prior? Basically, will AMD still have the perks of owning their own fabs?
Core i7 920 D0 B-batch (4.1) (Kinda Stable?) | DFI X58 T3eH8 (Fed up with its' issues, may get a new board soon) | Patriot 1600 (9-9-9-24) (for now) | XFX HD 4890 (971/1065) (for now) |
80GB X25-m G2 | WD 640GB | PCP&C 750 | Dell 2408 LCD | NEC 1970GX LCD | Win7 Pro | CoolerMaster ATCS 840 {Modded to reverse-ATX, WC'ing internal}
CPU Loop: MCP655 > HK 3.0 LT > ST 320 (3x Scythe G's) > ST Res >Pump
GPU Loop: MCP655 > MCW-60 > PA160 (1x YL D12SH) > ST Res > BIP 220 (2x YL D12SH) >Pump
AMD will still own a big chunk of the "new" company(44%) while maintaining equal vote right .So it's a win-win.They have no need to directly invest money in process node development as this will be a duty of a new company(Arab part particularly),while they will maintain close relationship with the co-foundry by having one new board member at AMD's board.They will do all things they have done in the past(testing designs,close relationship with guys at the fabs) without the burden of huge debt and need to invest a lot of $ in process development.Fusion and later Bulldozer will be sort of a test-chips for how well the new foundry will function.
Seems we made our greatest error when we named it at the start
for though we called it "Human Nature" - it was cancer of the heart
CPU: AMD X3 720BE@ 3,4Ghz
Cooler: Xigmatek S1283(Terrible mounting system for AM2/3)
Motherboard: Gigabyte 790FXT-UD5P(F4) RAM: 2x 2GB OCZ DDR3 1600Mhz Gold 8-8-8-24
GPU:HD5850 1GB
PSU: Seasonic M12D 750W Case: Coolermaster HAF932(aka Dusty)
That will last until investments are made in the new entity.AMD cannot afford the $ billions needed ; their share will go down significantly.In fact , I believe that's what they want to happen.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-100...=2547-1_3-0-20Be owned 44.4 percent by AMD and 55.6 percent by ATIC on a fully converted to common basis. ATIC's economic ownership will increase over time based on the differences in securities held by AMD and ATIC, and depending on whether AMD elects to invest proportionately with ATIC in future capital infusions to support The Foundry Company's growth.
44% of $4-6Billion is not pocket change.
Wow, I wonder if my being an AMD fanboy has any deeper meaning.With SF gone, I guess we'll never know.
But then I own more Intel chips so I guess I have a split personality.
![]()
bad news for you
http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:AMD
![]()
I think AMD dug out itself nicely from the black hole considering the economic crisis looming over US economy(euroland is not far neither in that respect,some banks seem to be in deep trouble)
Crazy Arabs i really don't see how they can make some $$$ (asuming they wont rip-off AMD) basically they have no other customer and they will "fight" TSMC and UMC for customers.
Also the NY fab will be bulk so maybe no more SOI for AMD?
Just some added info
Fab spin-off saves AMD and Hector Ruiz
http://www.tgdaily.com/html_tmp/cont...39627-118.html
and I am just gonna post this I know a lot of you don't want to read from this site so I'll just post it here
its from Fudzilla
AMD shares soar following spin-off news
Up 18.7 percent
the other is
The Abu Dhabi government is Investing $8.4 billion
the name of the new company is Foundry Co. and it will be run by AMD exec Doug Grose. Hector Ruiz will step down as director and head the Foundry Co. board.
They are gonna take control of the
two fabs in Germany and a new fab in New York
so far not a bad trade off
In progress......
Meyers (capt dirk) and Grose were interviewed on CNBC this morning and said that the facility in NY will be the most advanced in the world. Not sure what the means, but it sounds good.![]()
I would look much on the (now 11.3%) AMD rise. Specially in these rollercoaster times. Plys AMD stock is still under 5$.
However in short, AMD lost control over the fabs and the direction the development and product focus goes. So in my view, AMD found a way to survieve (Very good). However, it will never be the same AMD again. The CPU division will be the huge loser. And the foundry part the big winner. Nomatter how people wish to spin it. AMD will be a customer and could just aswell use TSMC for CPUs.
Bye bye highend. Welcome permant value and mainstream.
Also germany is the big winner since equiment for the empty FAB38 can now be bought.
Thats pretty much the usual BS. They dont know where their competitors are. So saying something 3-4 years down the road will be the most advanced is arrogant.
They might refer to other foundries in China/Taiwan. But a leader in manufactoring technology they are not.
Last edited by Shintai; 10-07-2008 at 11:11 AM.
Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
I know that their stocks will not go that low, but rather they should be a rather acceptable long term investment
and Ironically a better year long investment than Intel http://finance.google.com/finance?ch...YSE:AMD&ntsp=0
Last edited by nn_step; 10-07-2008 at 11:05 AM.
Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was
It's sad that people cannot accept other opinions.
Way to go with the permanent ridiculing and ad hominem attacks...
Actually he is entitled to a fair share of skepticism, anyone else wants to speculate on that topic or provide some facts (i.e. not insults)? What will this do for AMD in the long term? It seems they may lose the ability to fine tune the process if their share in the fab goes down and the Arabs try to serve other customers, no?
On the other hand maybe the fabs will transition faster and more smoothly to new process' because of the cash infusion?
Will they switch to a kind of bulk process to serve other customers?
Originally Posted by freecableguy
If you have the financial wherewithal, fixed costs (= fabs) is better because your marginal cost goes down with each unit you produce. If you don't, variable costs (= subcontracting) is the way to go because you only pay for what you use.
The new foundry company will be able to offer AMD's process tech to other companies. As long as ATIC's process tech is equal to or better than its competitors (TSMC). The Intel fanboys will discount this saying 'what process tech', but let's not forget that AMD made a native quad core with IMC at 65nm.
Bookmarks