MMM
Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 160

Thread: AMD Announcing Fab Spin-Off Tomorrow

  1. #26
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Finland, Eura
    Posts
    1,744
    One offtopic question:
    How long it takes to make CPU from silicon waffer?


    http://mato78.com - Finnish PC Hardware news & reviews
    BulldogPO @ Twitter


  2. #27
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by BulldogPO View Post
    One offtopic question:
    How long it takes to make CPU from silicon waffer?
    3 months give or take.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  3. #28
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by BulldogPO View Post
    One offtopic question:
    How long it takes to make CPU from silicon waffer?
    About 30 to 60 days depending on how mature the process is.

  4. #29
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    516
    The details of this move are very good for AMD. It is a big help to shoring up it's balance sheet, and now they have stupid investors spending all the money AMD did not have to upgrade their fabs.

  5. #30
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Jersey, U.S.
    Posts
    2,329
    Quote Originally Posted by Shaggy View Post
    I bought 1000 shares of their stock at $4.15 yesterday. God I'm good.
    Yes you are.

  6. #31
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Arizona, USA
    Posts
    1,700
    What I want to know, is this: Will AMD still have the relations with the new company, like they did prior? Basically, will AMD still have the perks of owning their own fabs?


    Core i7 920 D0 B-batch (4.1) (Kinda Stable?) | DFI X58 T3eH8 (Fed up with its' issues, may get a new board soon) | Patriot 1600 (9-9-9-24) (for now) | XFX HD 4890 (971/1065) (for now) |
    80GB X25-m G2 | WD 640GB | PCP&C 750 | Dell 2408 LCD | NEC 1970GX LCD | Win7 Pro | CoolerMaster ATCS 840 {Modded to reverse-ATX, WC'ing internal}

    CPU Loop: MCP655 > HK 3.0 LT > ST 320 (3x Scythe G's) > ST Res >Pump
    GPU Loop: MCP655 > MCW-60 > PA160 (1x YL D12SH) > ST Res > BIP 220 (2x YL D12SH) >Pump

  7. #32
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Lansing, MI / London / Stinkaypore
    Posts
    1,788
    Quote Originally Posted by ColonelCain View Post
    What I want to know, is this: Will AMD still have the relations with the new company, like they did prior? Basically, will AMD still have the perks of owning their own fabs?
    Quite. They have 44.4% in The Foundry Corp, so they are still the top dog customer there.

    But notice usage of the word "customer". The way finances are handled did have quite a change.
    Quote Originally Posted by radaja View Post
    so are they launching BD soon or a comic book?

  8. #33
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Quote Originally Posted by ColonelCain View Post
    What I want to know, is this: Will AMD still have the relations with the new company, like they did prior? Basically, will AMD still have the perks of owning their own fabs?
    AMD will still own a big chunk of the "new" company(44%) while maintaining equal vote right .So it's a win-win.They have no need to directly invest money in process node development as this will be a duty of a new company(Arab part particularly),while they will maintain close relationship with the co-foundry by having one new board member at AMD's board.They will do all things they have done in the past(testing designs,close relationship with guys at the fabs) without the burden of huge debt and need to invest a lot of $ in process development.Fusion and later Bulldozer will be sort of a test-chips for how well the new foundry will function.

  9. #34
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Thessaloniki, Greece
    Posts
    1,307
    Quote Originally Posted by Macadamia View Post
    Quite. They have 44.4% in The Foundry Corp, so they are still the top dog customer there.

    But notice usage of the word "customer". The way finances are handled did have quite a change.
    They are not simply a customer but also co-owner of the company
    Seems we made our greatest error when we named it at the start
    for though we called it "Human Nature" - it was cancer of the heart
    CPU: AMD X3 720BE@ 3,4Ghz
    Cooler: Xigmatek S1283(Terrible mounting system for AM2/3)
    Motherboard: Gigabyte 790FXT-UD5P(F4) RAM: 2x 2GB OCZ DDR3 1600Mhz Gold 8-8-8-24
    GPU:HD5850 1GB
    PSU: Seasonic M12D 750W Case: Coolermaster HAF932(aka Dusty )

  10. #35
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,036
    Quote Originally Posted by Shaggy View Post
    I bought 1000 shares of their stock at $4.15 yesterday. God I'm good.
    Now you need to sopread word of this to hype up the price! Congrats!

  11. #36
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,730
    Quote Originally Posted by BrowncoatGR View Post
    They are not simply a customer but also co-owner of the company
    That will last until investments are made in the new entity.AMD cannot afford the $ billions needed ; their share will go down significantly.In fact , I believe that's what they want to happen.

    Be owned 44.4 percent by AMD and 55.6 percent by ATIC on a fully converted to common basis. ATIC's economic ownership will increase over time based on the differences in securities held by AMD and ATIC, and depending on whether AMD elects to invest proportionately with ATIC in future capital infusions to support The Foundry Company's growth.
    http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-100...=2547-1_3-0-20

    44% of $4-6Billion is not pocket change.
    Quote Originally Posted by Heinz Guderian View Post
    There are no desperate situations, there are only desperate people.

  12. #37
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Jersey, U.S.
    Posts
    2,329
    Wow, I wonder if my being an AMD fanboy has any deeper meaning. With SF gone, I guess we'll never know. But then I own more Intel chips so I guess I have a split personality.

  13. #38
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    Quote Originally Posted by safan80 View Post
    I can't wait for their stock to reach $0.01
    bad news for you

    http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:AMD


  14. #39
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    I think AMD dug out itself nicely from the black hole considering the economic crisis looming over US economy(euroland is not far neither in that respect,some banks seem to be in deep trouble)

  15. #40
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Chile
    Posts
    4,151
    Crazy Arabs i really don't see how they can make some $$$ (asuming they wont rip-off AMD) basically they have no other customer and they will "fight" TSMC and UMC for customers.

    Also the NY fab will be bulk so maybe no more SOI for AMD?

  16. #41
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    172
    Just some added info
    Fab spin-off saves AMD and Hector Ruiz
    http://www.tgdaily.com/html_tmp/cont...39627-118.html

    and I am just gonna post this I know a lot of you don't want to read from this site so I'll just post it here

    its from Fudzilla

    AMD shares soar following spin-off news
    Up 18.7 percent

    the other is
    The Abu Dhabi government is Investing $8.4 billion
    the name of the new company is Foundry Co. and it will be run by AMD exec Doug Grose. Hector Ruiz will step down as director and head the Foundry Co. board.
    They are gonna take control of the
    two fabs in Germany and a new fab in New York
    so far not a bad trade off
    In progress......

  17. #42
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Jersey, U.S.
    Posts
    2,329
    Meyers (capt dirk) and Grose were interviewed on CNBC this morning and said that the facility in NY will be the most advanced in the world. Not sure what the means, but it sounds good.

  18. #43
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    I would look much on the (now 11.3%) AMD rise. Specially in these rollercoaster times. Plys AMD stock is still under 5$.

    However in short, AMD lost control over the fabs and the direction the development and product focus goes. So in my view, AMD found a way to survieve (Very good). However, it will never be the same AMD again. The CPU division will be the huge loser. And the foundry part the big winner. Nomatter how people wish to spin it. AMD will be a customer and could just aswell use TSMC for CPUs.

    Bye bye highend. Welcome permant value and mainstream.

    Also germany is the big winner since equiment for the empty FAB38 can now be bought.

    Quote Originally Posted by twilyth View Post
    Meyers (capt dirk) and Grose were interviewed on CNBC this morning and said that the facility in NY will be the most advanced in the world. Not sure what the means, but it sounds good.
    Thats pretty much the usual BS. They dont know where their competitors are. So saying something 3-4 years down the road will be the most advanced is arrogant.

    They might refer to other foundries in China/Taiwan. But a leader in manufactoring technology they are not.
    Last edited by Shintai; 10-07-2008 at 11:11 AM.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  19. #44
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    197
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    Bye bye highend. Welcome permant value and mainstream.
    BTW, how long has it been this way????? I think things can only get better

  20. #45
    YouTube Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    17,574
    Quote Originally Posted by safan80 View Post
    I can't wait for their stock to reach $0.01
    I know that their stocks will not go that low, but rather they should be a rather acceptable long term investment
    and Ironically a better year long investment than Intel http://finance.google.com/finance?ch...YSE:AMD&ntsp=0
    Last edited by nn_step; 10-07-2008 at 11:05 AM.
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  21. #46
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,084
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    AMD will be a customer and could just aswell use TSMC for CPUs.
    A costumer with 44% share and equal rights on the board.
    Also ATIC need AMD, otherwise ATIC fails to, so in the end thatīs not so simple.
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    And AMD is only a CPU manufactor due to stolen technology and making clones.

  22. #47
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    I would look much on the (now 11.3%) AMD rise. Specially in these rollercoaster times. Plys AMD stock is still under 5$.

    However in short, AMD lost control over the fabs and the direction the development and product focus goes. So in my view, AMD found a way to survieve (Very good). However, it will never be the same AMD again. The CPU division will be the huge loser. And the foundry part the big winner. Nomatter how people wish to spin it. AMD will be a customer and could just aswell use TSMC for CPUs.

    Bye bye highend. Welcome permant value and mainstream.

    Also germany is the big winner since equiment for the empty FAB38 can now be bought.



    Thats pretty much the usual BS. They dont know where their competitors are. So saying something 3-4 years down the road will be the most advanced is arrogant.

    They might refer to other foundries in China/Taiwan. But a leader in manufactoring technology they are not.
    which will make you happy i think

  23. #48
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    532
    Quote Originally Posted by eric66 View Post
    which will make you happy i think
    It's sad that people cannot accept other opinions.
    Way to go with the permanent ridiculing and ad hominem attacks...

    Actually he is entitled to a fair share of skepticism, anyone else wants to speculate on that topic or provide some facts (i.e. not insults)? What will this do for AMD in the long term? It seems they may lose the ability to fine tune the process if their share in the fab goes down and the Arabs try to serve other customers, no?
    On the other hand maybe the fabs will transition faster and more smoothly to new process' because of the cash infusion?
    Will they switch to a kind of bulk process to serve other customers?
    Quote Originally Posted by freecableguy
    the idiots out number us 10,000:1

  24. #49
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Jersey, U.S.
    Posts
    2,329
    Quote Originally Posted by Jacky View Post
    It's sad that people cannot accept other opinions.
    Way to go with the permanent ridiculing and ad hominem attacks...

    Actually he is entitled to a fair share of skepticism, anyone else wants to speculate on that topic or provide some facts (i.e. not insults)? What will this do for AMD in the long term? It seems they may lose the ability to fine tune the process if their share in the fab goes down and the Arabs try to serve other customers, no?
    On the other hand maybe the fabs will transition faster and more smoothly to new process' because of the cash infusion?
    Will they switch to a kind of bulk process to serve other customers?
    If you have the financial wherewithal, fixed costs (= fabs) is better because your marginal cost goes down with each unit you produce. If you don't, variable costs (= subcontracting) is the way to go because you only pay for what you use.

    The new foundry company will be able to offer AMD's process tech to other companies. As long as ATIC's process tech is equal to or better than its competitors (TSMC). The Intel fanboys will discount this saying 'what process tech', but let's not forget that AMD made a native quad core with IMC at 65nm.

  25. #50
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,646
    Quote Originally Posted by Jacky View Post
    It's sad that people cannot accept other opinions.
    Way to go with the permanent ridiculing and ad hominem attacks...
    Sorry, but he has earned it. A normal person posting an opinion is fine, everyone should have this basic right. But constantly attacking one brand everyday goes a little bit beyond "normal person" doesn't it?

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •