Just played around with the Demo Release of Cinema4d. I wanted to figure out performance differences between 10.0 and 11.0 Release for a K10. So i took the model from cinbench and rendered it in Cinema4d 11.0 Demo Release and noted the time the picture was done. Ok pictures says more then 1000 words
Nice work Maxon. Would be nice to see increases of a C2Q
ftp://ftp.maxon.net/pub/r11/CINEMA4DR11.zip
Last edited by Boschwanza; 08-19-2008 at 06:10 AM.
whut
^
Yes, I'm that stoked. C4D was my main app, but too late- I'm moving to greener pastures. The renders are still ugly and last-gen compared to Finalrender, vRay, Renderman, Mental or Maxwell.
Originally Posted by radaja
Oh man,that's some optimization job right there.It would be nice to see the increase on all platforms.
Vector SSE??
RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W
RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU
SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
XBONE paired with 55''Samsung LED 3D TV
I would like to think they finally did that,but i honestly don't know.Using scalar SSE when there is vector which is like miles faster always made me wonder wth are they doing there...
Last edited by informal; 08-19-2008 at 07:00 AM.
More like they fixed the ****ing borked Global Illumination.
That was AWFUL in R8.5, R9, R10, R10.5... when other software packages already had tons of improvments in rendering.
Any Core2 users willing to run some tests?
Seems we made our greatest error when we named it at the start
for though we called it "Human Nature" - it was cancer of the heart
CPU: AMD X3 720BE@ 3,4Ghz
Cooler: Xigmatek S1283(Terrible mounting system for AM2/3)
Motherboard: Gigabyte 790FXT-UD5P(F4) RAM: 2x 2GB OCZ DDR3 1600Mhz Gold 8-8-8-24
GPU:HD5850 1GB
PSU: Seasonic M12D 750W Case: Coolermaster HAF932(aka Dusty)
I can try, but I only ever ran Cinebench and never really used the program
If I get it to work I can compare times with CB10 on the Q6600 as well as my Octacore (rigs in sig)
with Core 2 Duo E8600 @ 4Ghz
Cinebench R10 = 1min 45sec
Cinema 4D 11 = 45sec
Cinebench R10 64 bit : 1 min 01 sec
Cinema 4D R11 64 bit : 28 sec
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
ASRock Radeon RX 7900 XTX Phantom Gaming OC
Asus ROG Strix B550-F Gaming Motherboard
Corsair RM1000x SHIFT PSU
32 GB DDR4 @3800 MHz CL16 (4 x 8 GB)
1x WD Black SN850 1 TB
1 x Samsung 960 250 GB
2 x Samsung 860 1 TB
1x Segate 16 TB HDD
Dell G3223Q 4K UHD Monitor
Running Windows 11 Pro x64 Version 23H2 build 22631.2506
Smartphone : Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
Yet another benchmark
wow, nice improvement
1. Asus P5Q-E / Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @~3612 MHz (8,5x425) / 2x2GB OCZ Platinum XTC (PC2-8000U, CL5) / EVGA GeForce GTX 570 / Crucial M4 128GB, WD Caviar Blue 640GB, WD Caviar SE16 320GB, WD Caviar SE 160GB / be quiet! Dark Power Pro P7 550W / Thermaltake Tsunami VA3000BWA / LG L227WT / Teufel Concept E Magnum 5.1 // SysProfile
2. Asus A8N-SLI / AMD Athlon 64 4000+ @~2640 MHz (12x220) / 1024 MB Corsair CMX TwinX 3200C2, 2.5-3-3-6 1T / Club3D GeForce 7800GT @463/1120 MHz / Crucial M4 64GB, Hitachi Deskstar 40GB / be quiet! Blackline P5 470W
I tryed to implement the Cinema4d 11 engine to Cinebench and it works. If you want the modded Cinbench10 just -> PM.
Isn't a rendering time improvement in the default render pretty much useless in real life applications?
I'm a max user, and I have never ever done any final renders with the default rendered. I almost always use vray or mental ray, even when baking textures.
CM Stacker 810 w/ Yate Loons | Enermax Infiniti 650W
ASUS P5K Deluxe | Corsair XMS2 PC2-6400 2x2GB
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 | Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme
BFG Geforce 8800GTS 640MB | ASUS Ageia PhysX P1 128MB
Logitech G15 | Logitech G5
Do you never prerender modell objects just for checking out the picture or scene?
An example of the "modded" Cinebench10-11 using your files..I tryed to implement the Cinema4d 11 engine to Cinebench and it works
Damn it's slow..
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
The XS WCG team needs your support.
A good project with good goals.
Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.
Hehe, thats what Intel did on IDF with its 45.000 point on Nehalem
Last edited by Boschwanza; 08-20-2008 at 10:49 AM.
If your REALLY sure of that then I have to send this to fugger..Hehe, thats what Intel did on IDF with its 45.000 point on Nehalem
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
The XS WCG team needs your support.
A good project with good goals.
Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.
I got the same results movieman, Check it.
My Rig can do EpicFLOPs, Can yours?
Once this baby hits 88 TeraFLOPs, You're going to see some serious $@#%....
Build XT7 is currently active.
Current OS Systems: Windows 10 64bit
Its just a bit logical . Cinema4d 11 Render engine will give you a boost up to 2.5x.
Nehalem 2.93 scores about 14k points with Cinebench 10 32Bit .. 3.2 will be around 17.000 * 2.5 makes 42.500 .. pretty close isnt it ?
I'd just like to know for sure if this is what they did because if that is so then my Harpertown at 3800 just destroyed their Nehalem and that doesn't make sense. They would bring their "A" game to IDF and no old fart like me is going to top them by 10,000 points..Its just a bit logical . Cinema4d 11 Render engine will give you a boost up to 2.5x.
Nehalem 2.93 scores about 14k points with Cinebench 10 32Bit .. 3.2 will be around 17.000 * 2.5 makes 42.500 .. pretty close isnt it ?
( as much as I'd like to beleive it!)
UNLESS their 45,000 score was with a single socket 4 core...HMMMMMMM...
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
The XS WCG team needs your support.
A good project with good goals.
Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.
Thats what i thaughtat least what has be reported here in germany
Then it makes sense with 4 cores and if you look at warboys score at 3600mhz of 31,000 their 45,000 and my 55,000 make sense..Thats what i thaught
Now I wonder what their 8 core Gainstown at 3200 will do?
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
The XS WCG team needs your support.
A good project with good goals.
Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.
if they modded cinbench they are just cheating numbers, cause average Joe thinks Nehalem will be 3 times faster then a QX9770Then it makes sense with 4 cores and if you look at warboys score at 3600mhz of 31,000 their 45,000 and my 55,000 make sense..
Now I wonder what their 8 core Gainstown at 3200 will do?.
Anyway 45000 is still very impressiv even with Cinema4d 11.0.
I had seen earlier that I had to run the harpers at 3600 to match a gainstown at 3000 and he was only on single channel memory and beta bios.if they modded cinbench they are just cheating numbers, cause average Joe thinks Nehalem will be 3 times faster then a QX9770
Anyway 45000 is still very impressiv even with Cinema4d 11.0.
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
The XS WCG team needs your support.
A good project with good goals.
Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks