MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 1090

Thread: IntelBurnTest - The new stress-testing program

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    8
    Great Little program.
    I'm still trying out to see how sensible is it.
    I'm using Vista Business x64 SP1 with 8GB, Q6600 GO VID 1.3000 @ 3.1GHz.

    I can report that using Max I get lower GFlop numbers and much lower CPU stress, CPU Temp (with Real/CoreTemp) report around 55C using custom with 6000-6500MB or mid settings I get 68-69C.

    After first fews runs look like prime95 but more stressfull, cpu temps are nearly 10C hotter:

    Running low memory high numbers -> Small FFT
    Running mid memory high numbers -> Large FFT
    Running high memory mid numbers -> Blend.

    Sometimes I get a slight different residual in the first round of test (5 test) but nothing in the next 2-3 rounds.

    I've tested my new rig without any problem at 3.1GHz 1.2875V 24h prime95 (latest beta), a mix of prime95/3DMark03 for 12h, Othos/OCCT whatever I've throw at it, stable like a rock, after the first round of LinPack in 5 min I've uncover that my CPU is not stable, up the vcore a notch, nearly stable, at vcore=VID=1.3 look stable.

    My goal is 3.0Ghz so I've attained it, yes not extreme, but it'll be my main rig and I want absolute stability, without pushing too far.

    BTW the q6600 GO are an absolute steal, not as fast as penryn clock-for-clock, but less problem with the board, mature process 65mm, more cheap, the next big things is the tock version of i7 (aka Nehalem) next summers not the penrys
    Last edited by mazzy; 08-17-2008 at 07:58 AM.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •