Its nothing to do with one brand Vs another, its to do with the IC's used, their binning and how to tune the board to suit them. I hope the modules did not run spec as RMAing just because the modules failed to overclock as high as you wanted costs OCZ a lot of money.
In tech support you learn that many people just don't have the patience to sit with a board and learn what works and what does not, some IC types need very little tweaking to get stable, some need a ton of tweaking. I have been working with this board for 3 days now, 10hrs a day as our tech support dept flagged it as a problem board with many having issues setting the board up with high speed dimms.
There are a lot of factors you guys fail to really talk about, such things as X48 chipset yield, QC of the build of the boards and sharing OC profiles. I see a ton of posts showing bios setup when all you have to do is post up the profile CMO file and let others try it out.
So to address your 1600 plats not doing to well, they are a more tightly binned module and really do not have the headroom of other modules. Better kits for overclocking are the 1800 or the 1333EB kits which use the high bin Micron IC's. Also if 1GB modules are all that is needed the 1600Flex 6-6-6-24 modules are awesome...although they are harder to set up due to the voltage and frequent skew requirements.
Bookmarks