Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 33 of 33

Thread: Folding@Malaysia going down..

  1. #26
    Nerdy Powerlifter
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Down in the Bayou
    Posts
    4,553
    Quote Originally Posted by road-runner View Post
    Every little bit is what adds up to that total everyday, and what makes a team...
    Exactly!
    You must [not] advance.


    Current Rig: i7 4790k @ stock (**** TIM!) , Zotac GTX 1080 WC'd 2214mhz core / 5528mhz Mem, Asus z-97 Deluxe

    Heatware

  2. #27
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Hhw
    Posts
    4,036
    Quote Originally Posted by road-runner View Post
    Edit: Shader clock 1800 on the GS and 1900 on the GT...
    RR if you switch those shader clocks, I think you would have identical scoring cards there

    Those gs's / gto's really look tasty.

  3. #28
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Conroe, Texas
    Posts
    3,010
    Quote Originally Posted by Marvin_The_Martian View Post
    RR if you switch those shader clocks, I think you would have identical scoring cards there

    Those gs's / gto's really look tasty.
    I cant get the GS to go to 1900, I got it to 1850 any higher and it locks my machine up. This is an old 965p board and old 20 pin power supply rig I built out of scrap parts laying around. It was a C2D but I put a Quad in it. All my other rigs are running Ubuntu as it gets more PPD..


  4. #29
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Hhw
    Posts
    4,036
    I can't fold over 1900 shaders myself, 1925 is gambling depending on temps I guess. That's on a 9600gt, diffrent core. It's weird, I can run furrmark at 2K without seeing anything suspicieus, ati tool to but fah eue's within a couple of minutes on those clocks. And the gto's/gs's have more sp's think the higher number you get the more reliant you are on the power circuitry.

    Road-runner if you have any folding capable cards in those ubuntu rigs there is a guide to get the clients running on wine ( though it's based in gentoo x64, and requires you to recompile wine ) I linked Angra to, but maybe you will be the one to give it a try for the first time and report back here? Guess for you people running real farms, the wine hack might be very influencial in deciding if you will fold on gpu's. The guide is linked to from the configuration stickey if you want to give it a try

  5. #30
    Attack Dachshund
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    South Carolina USA
    Posts
    3,161
    1836 was he best my gigabyte 256 8800gt's would do stable 24/7... and actually I went down a notch to 1782 just to be safe... those shaders seem to move up and down in steps (blocks of numbers), I couldn't just turn mine up by single digits. I could, but the real time clock would stay the same until it bumped into the next range, then the real time clock would bump to it's next level...
    but 1900 was eue'ing on me. temps 55-60....

  6. #31
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Conroe, Texas
    Posts
    3,010
    Yes I saw that people where running them in wine, I have 2-3870x2 and 2-2900s laying on the table however they do not put out enough PPD for me to run them. I had 1 paired with a Q6600 in windows and that is about 4,000 PPD per rig with 1-SMP and a GPU2. I can get that running 2 smp clients on Ubuntu and not have the extra power usage. ATI is just not doing so well compared to nvidia in folding. If I am going to sacrifice a quad in windows with a gpu folding I need that 5,000 PPD then that makes around 7,000 PPD per rig otherwise I just run 2 smps on Linux...


  7. #32
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Hhw
    Posts
    4,036
    Quote Originally Posted by MikeB12 View Post
    1836 was he best my gigabyte 256 8800gt's would do stable 24/7... and actually I went down a notch to 1782 just to be safe... those shaders seem to move up and down in steps (blocks of numbers), I couldn't just turn mine up by single digits. I could, but the real time clock would stay the same until it bumped into the next range, then the real time clock would bump to it's next level...
    but 1900 was eue'ing on me. temps 55-60....
    Mike those numbers don't make much sence to me, as the steps the shaders clock in aren't in there If you set 1836, you're still running 1825 or 1850 already ( from my own testing on the 9600gt ).

    Quote Originally Posted by road-runner View Post
    Yes I saw that people where running them in wine, I have 2-3870x2 and 2-2900s laying on the table however they do not put out enough PPD for me to run them. I had 1 paired with a Q6600 in windows and that is about 4,000 PPD per rig with 1-SMP and a GPU2. I can get that running 2 smp clients on Ubuntu and not have the extra power usage. ATI is just not doing so well compared to nvidia in folding. If I am going to sacrifice a quad in windows with a gpu folding I need that 5,000 PPD then that makes around 7,000 PPD per rig otherwise I just run 2 smps on Linux...
    I see and understand, those ppd's are really high, unobtainable under windows with the smp client. If you had Nvidia cards the tables would turn though, but atm you're sol.

  8. #33
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,169
    Quote Originally Posted by DAK1640 View Post
    Looks like we are taking another team out by this weekend...Great Job all !!!
    Heck yeah!
    Within 2 weeks, we'll overtake 3 more teams!!
    If each one of us active folders can recruit 1 more GPU folder, we have a real shot at the top 25 by year end!

    "[crunching is] a minor service to humanity as a side effect of our collective hardware fetish" - Blauhung

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •