Change the argument?Evading much now?
The point is that Nehalem is a whole new uarch. while Deneb was supposed to be just a shrink.I never "jizzed" over SPI scores as you put it,i even said it's a lame benchmark.
BTW my comments are not negative in Nehalem thread.You are from N. Ireland,right?You speak English?Read my comments again and point where i was wrong?Boinc benchmark tool showed us some amazing score so i questioned them and said we need a real world ppd not a tool to bench HT.
Crysis was also there so i found a techarp database and looked at scores C2Qs put out,whats wrong with that??
The only really exciting score i saw was the Vantage CPU score which is really amazing.All other questions i asked were valid.And remember it was the op in the Nehalem thread(JC) that said "far from your expectations" for some of the results,not me.Is he a hypocrite?
Bookmarks