i dont know if you are trying to seduce me into a trap to get me banned again, but i clearly stated 3.2+GHz, because shintai said there where nehalems much higher clocked then 3.2GHzOriginally Posted by Donnie27
and this will be my final statement in this thread
I'd hope he learned something, oh well.tsk tsk tsk
dont feed the troll!
not a chance by the looks of it
DNA = Design Not Accident
DNA = Darwin Not Accurate
heatware / ebay
HARDWARE I only own Xeons, Extreme Editions & Lian Li's
https://prism-break.org/
Seems that way.
Did i miss something?
Seems we made our greatest error when we named it at the start
for though we called it "Human Nature" - it was cancer of the heart
CPU: AMD X3 720BE@ 3,4Ghz
Cooler: Xigmatek S1283(Terrible mounting system for AM2/3)
Motherboard: Gigabyte 790FXT-UD5P(F4) RAM: 2x 2GB OCZ DDR3 1600Mhz Gold 8-8-8-24
GPU:HD5850 1GB
PSU: Seasonic M12D 750W Case: Coolermaster HAF932(aka Dusty)
nope, different..this is probably a reeeaaal old question - is the bracket/retention system for this socket the same dimensions as 775? (u know, where the push-pins go in etc)
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
The XS WCG team needs your support.
A good project with good goals.
Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.
nope!
'confirmed'
i hope its a permaban this time
DNA = Design Not Accident
DNA = Darwin Not Accurate
heatware / ebay
HARDWARE I only own Xeons, Extreme Editions & Lian Li's
https://prism-break.org/
If Gothr3k is unbanned why does it still say banned under his user name?
i3-8100 | GTX 970
Ryzen 5 1600 | RX 580
Assume nothing; Question everything
he *was* unbanned - for a very short time - which he made use of to troll *again* which led to him being banned again *voila*!
lets move on
DNA = Design Not Accident
DNA = Darwin Not Accurate
heatware / ebay
HARDWARE I only own Xeons, Extreme Editions & Lian Li's
https://prism-break.org/
he *was* unbanned - for a very short time - which he made use of to troll *again* which led to him being banned again *voila*!
lets move on
god, how can someone be that stupid (sry for that)... just continuing there where he stoped... without a lesson learned
...
hey! ur only a few hrs drive away from him right?god, how can someone be that stupid (sry for that)... just continuing there where he stoped... without a lesson learned- pay him a visit - for all of us!
DNA = Design Not Accident
DNA = Darwin Not Accurate
heatware / ebay
HARDWARE I only own Xeons, Extreme Editions & Lian Li's
https://prism-break.org/
He wasn't banned for that (though it certainly didn't help his case). He was banned for the same reason as his previous ban.
He has threatened to return, so if y'all see him/know a new account of his, we'd appreciate a heads-up
/discussion
*sings* a huntin' we will go, a huntin' we wil go, hey-ho-dairy-oh a huntin' we will goHe has threatened to return, so if y'all see him/know a new account of his, we'd appreciate a heads-up
DNA = Design Not Accident
DNA = Darwin Not Accurate
heatware / ebay
HARDWARE I only own Xeons, Extreme Editions & Lian Li's
https://prism-break.org/
This is a few days old, but I didn't see it posted, and perhaps it will get discussion back on track:
New Bloomfield 2.66 GHz Benchmarks from ChipHell:
http://www.techpowerup.com/index.php?65297
- 1M Super PI run at 15.475s
- Vantage CPU score .. 16294
- Cinebench xCPU score .. 12627
In the 3DMark Vantage test, the processor secured a CPU score of 16294. It crunched Super Pi 1M in 15.475 seconds. With the Cinebench, it secured 3048 with a single thread, the multi-threaded bench belted out 12627 CB-CPU hinting at the processor's high multi-core efficiency. And finally, Bloomfield takes SANDRA out on a date. You have to look at the red dot compared to a QX9770 yourself.
Faceman
Sure Face, it is just over-hyping LOL!
woot sandra benches!
btw. is there a chance that the spec bench suite can run on nehalem on its current state?
Last edited by Hornet331; 07-12-2008 at 10:50 AM.
So it is 30% faster (aprox) than a QX9770 at least in sabdra that is a lot given the MHz diference. I'm looking forward to Nehalem
Wow so far this new toy is looking amazing....but how much of the increase is from a different board me wonders?
..you mean X58?
It hardly has any bearing on the performance any more, all the relevant stuff is on the CPU now, northbridge, memory controller, the lot.
Not true.
Lots of the early X58 boards are having trouble running Tri-channel memory, even though Nehalem has an IMC.
This bug WILL be corrected before retail boards ship, however.
I tend to agree. I have no inside info but adding up all I've seen these boards look crippled to me and the memory usage seems to be where the problems are on these pre release boards.
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
The XS WCG team needs your support.
A good project with good goals.
Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.
Hehe - so the IMC isn't the problem solver it may have appeared at first
And you say this why?
Some say Bug, Others say it is crippled by Intel. I wonder what's really going on
If that's a mobo teething issue, then you have to conclude that design changes in the mobo can affect the performance of the IMC.Lots of the early X58 boards are having trouble running Tri-channel memory, even though Nehalem has an IMC.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks