Nehalem-EP......BLOOMFIELD

[GoThr3k]

All I can say is that this new member who joined in June wouldn't be tired of you saying "puts on a mod hat" unless they had really been here before and say. . . were banned. .

thanks for wrongly accusing me

[Movieman]

thanks for wrongly accusing me

correct, your IP and the other guys were different and from different countries. I did check that.

[GoThr3k]

correct, your IP and the other guys were different and from different countries. I did check that.

Altough i am gratefull you corrected my ban status, i still need to clarify something up.

I'm going to reply to you even though I don't think your worth my time.
You in prior posts made reference that the cpu wouldn't or hadn't been shown to do 3000mhz, I responded that I'd seen screenshots to the contrary.
Then you moved your point to 3200mhz and when shown by Metroid and then by myself that the chip will do 3200 you change to MORE than 3200.
Finally after this back and forth ad nauseum I tell you to stay out of the thread as it's becoming obvious to me that all your doing is looking for an arguement, IE: Trolling the thread what do you do?
You have to come back and open your big mouth, and to try and hurt me you toss in the comment about the machines not being fast enough to cure cancer.
With that one statement you have shown to all the child that resides in that 20 year old body.
Now you can take 7 days to think this over and I warn you, come back in a week and start this crap over and I'll ban your ass till the second coming of Christ!
Yes, you pushed the wrong damned buttons my friend.
I have a long fuse before I get pissed but you burned through all of it.
Let it go.

As you will read in the next quotes i was talking about 3Ghz Phenoms, and 3.2+ Ghz Nehalems. But first the cancer thing. The thing about your machines not curing cancer fast enough, was intended as a sarcastic joke, but i guess it wasnt your sense of humor. To the people who think I don't know the horrors of cancer, well, I do. Luckily enough it's not my personal experience, but I may state i have experience with cancer far beyond almost anyone fbeing a member of this forum.

everyone also saw phenom at 3ghz+ before release, no guarantee for overclock

I clearly state, phenom at 3ghz

There is 2.66 and 2.93Ghz ES samples out. Plus Intel easily shows off 3.2Ghz and alot higher.

where?

I ask for proof of 3.2+ Ghz nehalem

You don't see any relevance because it suits your position to ignore the relevance.
The relevance is that your saying "show me" clocks over 3000mhz on Nehalem.
My point is and was that if I could clock the clovers way beyond what was seen at the start of release on them then certainly others with greater skills than myself are clocking Nehalem to over 3000mhz and screen shots I've seen bear out my point.
Nehalem has been run to over 3000mhz even if you haven't seen it yourself.

I dont know why, but i always stated i wanted to see proof op nehalems above 3.2ghz, i still dont know where you see the 3Ghz number except in combination with the phenom. But this all doesnt matter anymore, just wanted to clarify things up.

[Donnie27]

Altough i am gratefull you corrected my ban status, i still need to clarify something up.



As you will read in the next quotes i was talking about 3Ghz Phenoms, and 3.2+ Ghz Nehalems. But first the cancer thing. The thing about your machines not curing cancer fast enough, was intended as a sarcastic joke, but i guess it wasnt your sense of humor. To the people who think I don't know the horrors of cancer, well, I do. Luckily enough it's not my personal experience, but I may state i have experience with cancer far beyond almost anyone fbeing a member of this forum.


I clearly state, phenom at 3ghz


I ask for proof of 3.2+ Ghz nehalem


I dont know why, but i always stated i wanted to see proof op nehalems above 3.2ghz, i still dont know where you see the 3Ghz number except in combination with the phenom. But this all doesnt matter anymore, just wanted to clarify things up.

http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/04...o_clock_speed/

http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/i...essors-at-idf/

http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/05/i...3-2ghz-penryn/

Intel's Nehalem benchmarked: 2.66GHz faster than 3.2GHz Penryn

[tiro_uspsss]

http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/04...o_clock_speed/

http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/i...essors-at-idf/

http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/05/i...3-2ghz-penryn/

tsk tsk tsk

dont feed the troll!

[Donnie27]

tsk tsk tsk

dont feed the troll!

I'd hope he learned something, oh well.

[tiro_uspsss]

I'd hope he learned something, oh well.

not a chance by the looks of it

[GoThr3k]

http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/04...o_clock_speed/

http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/i...essors-at-idf/

http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/05/i...3-2ghz-penryn/

i dont know if you are trying to seduce me into a trap to get me banned again, but i clearly stated 3.2+GHz, because shintai said there where nehalems much higher clocked then 3.2GHz
and this will be my final statement in this thread