Oh, I want a Nehalem rig!!! When I'll get what I want?Originally Posted by Movieman
Until then, JC where are you? We need some more benches mate. We also need OC results!
Oh, I want a Nehalem rig!!! When I'll get what I want?
Until then, JC where are you? We need some more benches mate. We also need OC results!
I understand. No issue with you at all on this.Hey I hope you didn't take my post in a way I didn't intend it to be read.
I was saying that I think this new member isn't really a new member and was an existing [or banned member] that decided to create another account to flame. The comment about "getting tired of you saying putting on a mod's hat" is unfounded as I have been here longer than them [well according to their join date] and I have only see you ban [temp or permanent] a member twice. The way they phrased it suggests you ban people on a daily basis.
They were rude to DrWho? and to yourself. Butt licking suggestions followed up with 'service you' statements aren't pleasant, especially when you don't deserve it.
I'm a simple person so I hope you understand what I'm saying
Me too..Oh, I want a Nehalem rig!!! When I'll get what I want?
Until then, JC where are you? We need some more benches mate. We also need OC results!
The only thing I can think of is that JC from what I saw was using one stick of 1 gig memory.
That's pretty minimal, I use 2x1 gig on the Q6600.
Even though the amount of memory would be sufficient to run 4 instances of WCG and that we;ve seen there isn't a lot of increase by using faster memory, I think that the issue is in there or in the usage of that memory in a beta board.
That's just a gut feeling and nothing scientific to back it up.
Last edited by Movieman; 07-10-2008 at 11:13 AM.
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
The XS WCG team needs your support.
A good project with good goals.
Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.
Some more published benchies of Nehalem @ 2.93 over at Tom's
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/int...core,5854.html
3DMark 06 1280x1024 noAA Score
3DMarks 12786
SM2.0 score 4605
HDR/SM3.0 score 5600
CPU score 5183
PCMark 05 Score
PCMark 9852
CPU score 9583
Memory 9010
3DMark Vantage Score
CPU score 17966
CPU Test1 (Plans/S) 2515.1
CPU Test2 (Steps/S) 23.08
PCMark 05 Score
Nehalem 2.93 GHz 9852
Core 2 Extreme QX6800 2.93 GHz 8925
QuadFX Athlon FX-74 3 GHz 7501
AMD Phenom 9850 BE 2.5 GHz 7400
Now if they'd only run some real software
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks