Anybody else noticed inconsistent or lower than expected 3dmarks with the diamond? Ive had this board running for a few weeks now and cant match my SIIF scores. i consistently scored 19,500 with tri-sli with my striker, but with the diamond i havent been able to even hit 18,500. Same issues with 3dmark vantage. I was hitting 20k with the physics drivers with the asus and cant break 18,500 with the diamond. On 3dmark06 i always pay close attention to the very first framerates that pop up on the first test, i could normally come close to guessing final score by the first couple of numbers. On the striker i would get 120-130 fps on the first couple of frames, but with the diamond i get 100-110. Another strange issue is if i change the resolution to 1920x1200 i get a couple of frames higher than @ the default 1280x1024. I wonder if it has anything to do with the diamonds SLI bridge(s)? The striker has 1 solid 3-card bridge. The Diamond u have the single bridges.
Diamond:Striker:
![]()




Striker:
Reply With Quote


you know how 3dmark misreads. It only reads what the default multiplier is. I wish this cpu would run @ 4400. This is the screenshot from my earlier benchmarks on page 32 with the diamond. It shows 4442 in 3dmark06, but to the right you see how everest reads it, 4207.



You have a nice cpu clock, are you clocking the 9800 too? Save your penies and buy another... nvidia prices are dropping fast so it's not so much of a stretch as it was a few weeks ago. The 9800gtx is already down to $199 and who knows what could happen in another month the way things are going now in the card world. I think if you can sli you'll see such a huge improvement in your games. THe ones you mentioned are some of the ones that come to mind as scaling really, really well in sli.



Bookmarks