Quote Originally Posted by JCornell View Post
Far from your expectation...
Aren't the score actually pretty good?

Kentsfield @ 3600 MHz (4 CPU)
3558 Whet / CPU
8289 Dhry / CPU

Bloomfield @ 2933 MHz (8 CPU)
2786 Whet / CPU
7095 Dhry / CPU

Now this is where I might get it all wrong:

(score) x (number of CPU)

Kentsfield:
3558 x 4 Whet = 14232
8289 x 4 Dhry = 33156

Bloomfield:
2786 x 8 Whet = 22288
7095 x 8 Dhry = 56760

Looks to me like Bloomfield / Nehalem is much stronger, or did I get it all wrong? If I have gotten the above wrong, then that WCG benchmark sure is misleading or confusing.