MMM
Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Exhaustive Performance Anaylasis of ATI 4800 platform

Threaded View

  1. #2
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    North USA
    Posts
    670
    In this post I'll examine the potential for a memory bottleneck on the 4800 series. As I stated earlier:

    Quote Originally Posted by Truckchase! View Post
    here's a different take on how to tell what impact mem bandwidth is having...

    1> benchmark 4850 @ stock speeds
    2> oc the GPU and vMem by a static percentage (15&#37 and bench
    3> OC just the GPU and Just the vMem by the same static percentage and benchmark each oc seperately.

    Compare the results to see how large of an impact the vMem overclocking has on performance vs. the gpu. In all actuality, you need only to do step 1 and 3, but 2 is always fun to compare against to make sure there isn't an odd unknown variable.

    Here's an example from when I did this on a 2900xt:
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...5&postcount=31
    I've done this at 1600x1200 with AA on/of and Aniso on/off. Here are the results from the two extremes on a 4850:

    Note that the 4850 is the more effective card of the two to check for memory bandwidth bottlenecks in this fashion because of the significantly lower overall bandwidth. That being said, I'll still test the 4870 later.

    Quick note on the graphs... stock speeds are 100%, this shows the performance relative to that for ONLY gpu overclocked and ONLY mem overclocked. All overclocking for this test was by 12%.

    This platform definitely looks to be more bandwidth restricted than the 2900, which is no surprise being that the 2900 had a full 512bit interface. I unfortunately don't have 3870 numbers to compare to, but I suspect that the results would be similar to that of the 2900 since the overall performance characteristics are very close. There is certainly potential justification here for GDDR5, as the bottlenecks on some games are close to being evenly split across the memory and gpu.

    More analysis to come on these numbers...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	snag-0007.jpg 
Views:	2088 
Size:	94.5 KB 
ID:	81300   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	snag-0008.jpg 
Views:	1993 
Size:	92.3 KB 
ID:	81301  
    Last edited by Truckchase!; 06-30-2008 at 02:13 PM. Reason: Changed graphs to be easier to read, removed both overclocked
    Asus P6T-DLX V2 1104 & i7 920 @ 4116 1.32v(Windows Reported) 1.3375v (BIOS Set) 196x20(1) HT OFF
    6GB OCZ Platinum DDR3 1600 3x2GB@ 7-7-7-24, 1.66v, 1568Mhz
    Sapphire 5870 @ 985/1245 1.2v
    X-Fi "Fatal1ty" & Klipsch ProMedia Ultra 5.1 Speaks/Beyerdynamic DT-880 Pro (2005 Model) and a mini3 amp
    WD 150GB Raptor (Games) & 2x WD 640GB (System)
    PC Power & Cooling 750w
    Homebrew watercooling on CPU and GPU
    and the best monitor ever made + a Samsung 226CW + Dell P2210 for eyefinity
    Windows 7 Utimate x64

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •