So, has anyone managed to get the nVidia physX working in cellfactor?
So, has anyone managed to get the nVidia physX working in cellfactor?
Case: NZXT Lexa
PSU: Corsair HX620
Memory: G.Skill F2-8000CL5D-4GBPQ (2GB x 2)
CPU cooler: ThermalRight Ultra-120 EXTREME with Noctua NF-P12
Motherboard: Asus Rampage Formula (BIOS 219, made in china)
Processor: E2160
Graphics card: Club3d 9800 GTX
Input: Logitech G15 v2 + Logitech G9
i believe that depends exclusively on nVidia efforts, I don't think any enthusiast will be able to do soOriginally Posted by GoldiClocks
(hope I could be wrong, but don't think so...)
Are we there yet?
Works nicely with UT3 physx maps... more than 2x boost compared to letting cpu doing the job.
Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs
If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place
With SLI.
I'll try disabling SLI to see how it compares.
EDIT: So i disabled SLI and just like another member that tested dual cards. I have no option to select what GPU does the PhysX's calculations which is not what the first post says
Last edited by lowfat; 06-25-2008 at 07:04 PM.
As was thought scores were no different than a single GPU.
Hopefully other apps will take use of it soon to really try it out.
you should try ut3 lighthouse map, and report your fps, so one can see if a card doing physx + one card rendering, gives much more fps.
don't try to select which card will do physx, according to vantage scores only one does it, if the same happens with ut3, fps should be high
Are we there yet?
http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/6...sxresulql9.jpg
3dmark vantage on this E7200 @ 3.6 GHz, RAM @ DDR2-1000 5-5-5-15, 8800GT @ 720/1800/2100
177.39 w/PhysX enabled...
Computer:
Case: Corsair 750D Airflow Edition
Mobo: Gigabyte Aorus X570 Ultra
RAM: Team TForce Xtreem ARGB 3600C14 2x16gb XMP
CPU: AMD Ryzen 5900x
Graphics: EVGA (rip) RTX 3080 FTW3
PSU: Seasonic Focus GX 850w
Cooling: Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360mm
NVMe: SKHynix P41 Platinum, Samsung 980 Pro 2tb
SSD: Micron 1100 2TB, Samsung 860 Evo 1tb
HDD: WD SE 2TB, WD Black 1tb 3 platter with over 10 years of power-on time
[H]ardOCP has a nice picture for you all...
http://www.hardocp.com/news.html?new...VzaWFzdCwsLDE=We don’t have much information on this aside from the screenshot below but, from the looks of this 3DMark Vantage screenshot, the Radeon HD 3850 is capable of PhysX GPU acceleration. Again, we don’t have any info on this other than what you see here but we thought we’d share anyway. Thanks to EBadit for the screenshot.
http://www.hardocp.com/image.html?im...pfMV8xX2wuanBn
TAMGc5: PhII X4 945, Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD3P, 2x Kingston PC2-6400 HyperX CL4 2GB, 2x ASUS HD 5770 CUcore Xfire, Razer Barracuda AC1, Win8 Pro x64 (Current)
TAMGc6: AMD FX, Gigabyte GA-xxxx-UDx, 8GB/16GB DDR3, Nvidia 680 GTX, ASUS Xonar, 2x 120/160GB SSD, 1x WD Caviar Black 1TB SATA 6Gb/s, Win8 Pro x64 (Planned)
Photoshop?
Case: NZXT Lexa
PSU: Corsair HX620
Memory: G.Skill F2-8000CL5D-4GBPQ (2GB x 2)
CPU cooler: ThermalRight Ultra-120 EXTREME with Noctua NF-P12
Motherboard: Asus Rampage Formula (BIOS 219, made in china
Processor: E2160
Graphics card: Club3d 9800 GTX
Input: Logitech G15 v2 + Logitech G9
I don't have UT3 to try it out....you should try ut3 lighthouse map, and report your fps, so one can see if a card doing physx + one card rendering, gives much more fps.
don't try to select which card will do physx, according to vantage scores only one does it, if the same happens with ut3, fps should be high
THIS IS GREAT (if true)
It means every GPU will be able to accelerate PhysX!
Now I want to see the fanATIcs talk sh1t about nVidia.
If this is true, you can see that the control panel is ready for Radeon cards, and means nVidia is doing this free for all.
Talk about dark side now, huh?
Are we there yet?
NV drivers working with Radeon cards? I smell BS. Those drivers have PhysX ported to CUDA right?
Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)
AFAIK, every 177.xx works with PhysX 8.06.12, and those 177.xx bring cuda.dll.
I think CUDA works with radeon architecture, remember editor's day, nVidia's CEO told everybody that Cuda works with ATI GPUs, but please, don't tell them!!
makes me wish this is real
Are we there yet?
Let's hope so, I want Cellfactor with PhysX badly
Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)
http://techgage.com/article/nvidias_...status_report/
Techgage tested PhysX. In Vantage 9800 is 4 times more powerful than a PPU but in UT3 frames are lower. Since 8600s have 1/4 of 9800's SP, it should be as powerful as a PPU. I'm think getting another CUDA-enabled card for Physics processing when future drivers support them.
Core i7 920
Scythe Mugen 2
Silicon Power DDR3-1333 2GBx3
Gigabyte EX58-UD4
Palit GTX 260 Sonic 896MB
Samsung Spinpoint F1 640GBx2 Matrix RAID
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB
Creative Audigy 2 ZS
Winfast TV2000 XP Expert
Antec Earthwatts 650W
Coolermaster CM 690
LG W2442PA
Win 7 RC x64
I hope they test a GPU as a separate PhysX card as well.
Rig Specs
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 4.0ghz 1.37v - DFI Lanparty UT P35 TR2 - 4x1GB Team Xtreem DDR2-1066 - Palit 8800GT Sonic 512MB GDDR3 256-bit
160GB Seagate Barracuda 7200RPM SATA II 8MB Cache - 320GB Western Digital Caviar 7200RPM SATA II 16MB Cache - Liteon 18X DVD-Writer /w LS
640GB Western Digital SE16 7200RPM SATA II 16MB Cache - Corsair HX 620W Modular PSU - Cooler Master Stacker 832
Auzen 7.1 X-Plosion - Zalman ZM-DS4F - Sennheiser HD212 Pro - Edifier M2600
Custom Water Cooling
Dtek Fusion Extreme CPU Block - Swiftech MCR-220 - Swiftech MCP655-B - Swiftech MCRES-MICRO Reservior - 7/16" ID x 5/8" OD Tubings
Dual Thermaltake A2018s 120mm Blue LED Smart fans.
www.mni-photography.site88.net
Hi guys, if i understand right the whole physx thing, than i'll be able to purchase gtx280 etc, and leave my existing 8800gts (g92) in a second PCIex(4x) slot and set it as a dedicated physx card, even though my board doesn't support SLI it wouldn't matter since i'm not gonna use it in sli, is that correct (i have abit ip35 pro)? And if anyone did any tests that show how usefull that would be? what's gonna be the real gain fps wise, comparing to a single gtx280 with no additional card ?
http://pclab.pl/art33645-8.html
It's in polish, but you should understand graphs
In graphs, was it a 9800 + 9800as a dedicated physx card, or is it 9800+9800 in sli?, i can read russian, not polish
Yes, 2nd 9800 GTX+ was used as dedicated physX card. 9800 GTX+ + GPU PhysX is with one card doing PhysX and graphics.
Do you guys think i'd need a second power supply if i buy gtx280? right now i have corsair 620W..I know you could get psu from thermaltake to put into 5,25 bay, are trhere any other alternatives?
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks