MMM
Page 2 of 16 FirstFirst 1234512 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 394

Thread: [Autopsy] ATI Radeon HD 4870 Update: Review

  1. #26
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    849
    Quote Originally Posted by chew* View Post
    did no one else notice that it appears that the card pictured has no cross fire capability?
    Wouldn't the bridge "port" be at the top of the card near the PCI bracket? Didn't see a picture of that area, just assumed it was there.

    • i7 920 D0 // eVGA X58 SLI // 12GB G.Skill Ripjaws // HD6950 (6970 BIOS)
    • Apogee XT // MCP655 // Thermochill PA120.3 // CM HAF 932
    • OCZ Vertex 3 MI edition // ASUS Xonar DX // Corsair TX850
    • HTC Incredible - Uber Kingdom Revolution ROM


  2. #27
    Brilliant Idiot
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Hell on Earth
    Posts
    11,015
    um the first pic clearly shows the PCI bracket and a solid pcb where the crossfire link would be. I see no traces or solder points there either.
    heatware chew*
    I've got no strings to hold me down.
    To make me fret, or make me frown.
    I had strings but now I'm free.
    There are no strings on me

  3. #28
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    US, Virginia
    Posts
    1,513
    How much more are the 1gb versions supposed to run? I thought that 4870 was 1gb period, I didn't know they were first going to have a 512mb variant (at the price point I was thinking for 1gb). Now I'm really not sure what to do. The 260 and 280 don't seem worth the money to me, and the 4850 simply isn't a big enough of a performance increase coming from an 8800gt. Guess I'll just have to wait for some reviews, but I'm tired I waiting .
    E8400 @ 3600mhz
    4870 @ 790/1100
    2x2GB DDR2

  4. #29
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by YMAA View Post
    Which card and which game? What framerate is considered playable? Not doubting your opinion, just want some more information
    as we all know 9800gtx has higher core clock, still 8800gtx beats the 9800gtx -> vram limited.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1213619796630.PNG 
Views:	1789 
Size:	75.4 KB 
ID:	80923   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	GTX280_Test_Benchmark_Call_of_Juarez_DirectX_10_v1.1.0.0_1920x1200.PNG 
Views:	1807 
Size:	76.0 KB 
ID:	80924  
    Last edited by Hornet331; 06-23-2008 at 04:34 AM.

  5. #30
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Mi
    Posts
    1,063
    Quote Originally Posted by NapalmV5 View Post
    u guys make it like the 512MB @ ati runs high rez heroically.. it doesnt!

    max high quality + no antialiasing @ 1920x1080 = not very playable



    Please explain more... because my understanding is that 512mb @GDDR5 (3.5ghz) would be fine at 19x12. Not that there isn't going to be a 1g version, just find your comments somewhat "illogical".
    Last edited by Xoulz; 06-23-2008 at 04:45 AM.

  6. #31
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spain, EU
    Posts
    2,949
    Quote Originally Posted by Expreview
    And, it beats GTX 260, in price and performance. Our review will be out in days, keep tuned.
    Do want.

    But with 1GB.
    Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)


    Quote Originally Posted by PerryR, on John Fruehe (JF-AMD) View Post
    Pretty much. Plus, he's here voluntarily.

  7. #32
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    849
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornet331 View Post
    as we all know 9800gtx has higher core clock, still 8800gtx beats the 9800gtx -> vram limited.
    We were debating ATI vs. nVidia max quality no AA 1920 x 1080, not nVidia vs. nVidia high quality 4xAA 1920 x 1080.

    Also, Napalm, we never said an ATI card with less VRAM would automatically run a max quality high-res game heroically, the meaning was that an ATI card would generally do better at higher resolutions than a comparable nVidia card. Perhaps we should have been more specific.

    Quote Originally Posted by chew* View Post
    um the first pic clearly shows the PCI bracket and a solid pcb where the crossfire link would be. I see no traces or solder points there either.
    Doesn't really show it that clearly, the bracket is still sort of in the way. Not a clear shot of the top, I'd still like a better picture.

    • i7 920 D0 // eVGA X58 SLI // 12GB G.Skill Ripjaws // HD6950 (6970 BIOS)
    • Apogee XT // MCP655 // Thermochill PA120.3 // CM HAF 932
    • OCZ Vertex 3 MI edition // ASUS Xonar DX // Corsair TX850
    • HTC Incredible - Uber Kingdom Revolution ROM


  8. #33
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,046
    512MB just isnt enough for 1920 rez be it ati/nvidia

    illogical? maybe those of you not running high rez.. why u guys arguing with those of us @ high rez?

    i can go back 5 years.. hell ill go back 10 years @ warzone 2100

    your ati/nvidia 512MB craps itself @ 1920

  9. #34
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    263
    Just gonna pop in for a quick question: Do you guys think it's relevant that a card is faster at 1920x1200 with AA enabled etc. than another card, yet the absolute framerate isn't playable anyway?

  10. #35
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Tel Aviv, Israel
    Posts
    1,153
    Click the link, they stripped the card and there are CF connections present.
    Member of Overclockers.com Folding @ Home team
    "<The_Coolest> you can't unwaste wasted CPU cycles" - Start FOLDing now!
    Main rig:
    AMD Ryzen 7 2700X / Mobo: Asrock Fatal1ty X470 / EVO 970 500GB + WD Blue 250GB + HDD / GPU: Dell RX 570 4GB / Mem: 2x16GB DDR4-3200 G.Skill 32GTZKW TridentZ - 32GB total / PSU: Seasonic Prime Ultra Gold 650W
    Secondary rigs:
    Core i7 2600K 3.4GHz @ 4.3GHz (Scythe Mugen2) / Mobo: Biostar TP67XE / 2x Inland Pro 120GB / GPU: HD5450 / Mem: 4x4GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 8GBXL RipJawsX - 16GB total / PSU: Seasonic S12II 620W.
    Core i3 540 3.06GHz @ 4.0GHz (Freezer 7 Pro) / Mobo: MSI H55M-ED55 / GPU: Integrated / Mem: 4x2GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 4GBRL RipJaws - 8GB total / PSU: Antec 380W.

    Core Temp - Accurate temperature monitor for Intel's Core/Core 2 and AMD64 processors

  11. #36
    Xtreme Guru adamsleath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    3,803
    Quote Originally Posted by munim View Post
    Just gonna pop in for a quick question: Do you guys think it's relevant that a card is faster at 1920x1200 with AA enabled etc. than another card, yet the absolute framerate isn't playable anyway?
    chuckles; it's like you can now have 150fps+ in some games or <20fps in others, much the same as before.

    look; if i was buying now id have a 4850 bang for buck,

    and nitpicking the neck and neck perf. of the 4870 and a 9800gtx+...

    i think the gtx260 will beat 4870, but i'll be pleasantly surprised if it is the other way around, cos the gtx2xx's are pretty darn expensive

    ati have just played catchup with the g92 series, which means they should gain significant marketshare, but really they've only matched wot nv has had for a long while.
    will 4870 dominate the g92's? , and yet sit under gt200.

    i wish there were some graphs and such for 4870 already.
    Last edited by adamsleath; 06-23-2008 at 05:26 AM.
    i7 3610QM 1.2-3.2GHz

  12. #37
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Hopatcong, NJ
    Posts
    1,078
    Looks like a decent stock cooler, at least compared to the RV670 heatsink. How thick are those heatpipes? Looks at least 8mm
    Interesting results from the Techreport review. Have not seen it before and its making me think twice on waiting for the 1GB cards. I game at 1920x1080

    'Gaming' AMD FX-6300 @ 4.5GHz | Asus M5A97 | 16GB DDR3 2133MHz | GTX760 2GB + Antec Kuhler620 mod | Crucial m4 64GB + WD Blue 2x1TB Str
    'HTPC' AMD A8-3820 @ 3.5GHz | Biostar TA75A+ | 4GB DDR3 | Momentus XT 500GB | Radeon 7950 3GB
    'Twitch' AMD 720BE @ 3.5GHz | Gigabyte GA-78LMT-S2P | 4GB DDR3 | Avermedia Game Broadcaster

    Desktop Audio: Optical Out > Matrix mini DAC > Virtue Audio ONE.2 > Tannoy Reveal Monitors + Energy Encore 8 Sub
    HTPC: Optoma HD131XE Projector + Yamaha RX-V463 + 3.2 Speaker Setup

  13. #38
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ace Deuce, Michigan
    Posts
    3,955
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornet331 View Post
    as we all know 9800gtx has higher core clock, still 8800gtx beats the 9800gtx -> vram limited.
    Its not just about the v-ram, in general the 9800gtx takes a far harder hit than the 4850 (which mind you has less bandwidth and same amount of memory) which goes to show that it also is about how much back end power the g80 cards have (which is good for ati since their 800 shaders has proved to be more than enough for aa)
    Quote Originally Posted by Hans de Vries View Post

    JF-AMD posting: IPC increases!!!!!!! How many times did I tell you!!!

    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    .....}
    until (interrupt by Movieman)


    Regards, Hans

  14. #39
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by STaRGaZeR View Post
    Do want.

    But with 1GB.
    I'd much rather they used a 512bit bus to either that 512MB or 1GB of RAM. It will end up choking when compared to other 512bit cards. Doesn't mean it will suck but it wil be like running WinXP with 1GB of RAM instead of 2GB.
    Last edited by Donnie27; 06-23-2008 at 11:11 AM. Reason: Removed mega LOL!

  15. #40
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    HD0
    Posts
    2,646
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornet331 View Post
    as we all know 9800gtx has higher core clock, still 8800gtx beats the 9800gtx -> vram limited.
    or perhaps it's just memory bandwidth limited...
    and the fact of the matter is, if you had an 8800ultra, the frame rate is so darned low you'de be reducing settings anyway.


    and the second example shows a 3870x2 beating a 8800ultra... observe how the 3870 only has 512mb addressable space...
    Last edited by xlink; 06-23-2008 at 05:28 AM.

  16. #41
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    City of Lights, The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,381
    Quote Originally Posted by Miwo View Post
    Looks like a decent stock cooler, at least compared to the RV670 heatsink. How thick are those heatpipes? Looks at least 8mm
    Interesting results from the Techreport review. Have not seen it before and its making me think twice on waiting for the 1GB cards. I game at 1920x1080
    Well, going from 512MB to 1GB on a RV670 made absolutely no difference, not even on a 25x16 res. Just check this review:
    http://techreport.com/articles.x/14654
    Not sure how that will translate to what an RV770 will do with the extra RAM.

    EDIT: @Hornet331: How is it possible for the 3870 to be faster than a 9800GTX on those settings? Especially in crysis which generally favors the NVIDIA cards.
    Last edited by Helmore; 06-23-2008 at 05:39 AM.
    "When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman

    Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |

  17. #42
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    50
    Considering how well the 4850 does with 512mb @ 1920x1200 or 2560x1600, I doubt 512->1Gb will make that much of a difference for the 4870.

  18. #43
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    City of Lights, The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,381
    I think the future headroom for a 4870 can be useful, I don't think it will mater to anyone whom will dispose of his card when something better for the price comes around. Like a next year refresh for example.
    1GB is probably pretty useless on a 4850 though.
    "When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman

    Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |

  19. #44
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Hopatcong, NJ
    Posts
    1,078
    Yeah I know ^^ , i was just saying that I have not seen the review until reading this thread , not the other way around. I just woke up!

    'Gaming' AMD FX-6300 @ 4.5GHz | Asus M5A97 | 16GB DDR3 2133MHz | GTX760 2GB + Antec Kuhler620 mod | Crucial m4 64GB + WD Blue 2x1TB Str
    'HTPC' AMD A8-3820 @ 3.5GHz | Biostar TA75A+ | 4GB DDR3 | Momentus XT 500GB | Radeon 7950 3GB
    'Twitch' AMD 720BE @ 3.5GHz | Gigabyte GA-78LMT-S2P | 4GB DDR3 | Avermedia Game Broadcaster

    Desktop Audio: Optical Out > Matrix mini DAC > Virtue Audio ONE.2 > Tannoy Reveal Monitors + Energy Encore 8 Sub
    HTPC: Optoma HD131XE Projector + Yamaha RX-V463 + 3.2 Speaker Setup

  20. #45
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    4,308
    Stock cooler looks very nice. Would be interesting to see a 512MB vs 1GB comparision of these cards.
    Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs

    If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place

  21. #46
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    392
    You guys hate that fan? I LOVE that fan on my 2900pro. If it didnt have it there would be no way I could hit the overclocks I do. You dont HAVE to run it loud, it just an option if you want to clock higher on the stock cooler!
    E7200 @ 4.0ghz 1.29vcore
    2x 6870
    OCZ 4gb @ 5-4-4-12 846mhz

  22. #47
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Lansing, MI / London / Stinkaypore
    Posts
    1,788
    Quote Originally Posted by NapalmV5 View Post
    far from it

    the unofficial 1GB 3870 was released @ the end of last earth cycle.. bit late

    u ati fanatucii should take some chill pills.. huh?

    im by no means nvidias
    Thanks for making this discussion go nowhere though.

  23. #48
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    HB
    Posts
    534
    Quote Originally Posted by NapalmV5 View Post
    512MB just isnt enough for 1920 rez be it ati/nvidia

    illogical? maybe those of you not running high rez.. why u guys arguing with those of us @ high rez?

    i can go back 5 years.. hell ill go back 10 years @ warzone 2100

    your ati/nvidia 512MB craps itself @ 1920
    Hardly....... I have ZERO problems playing any of my games at 1920X1200 w/ 8AA and 16AF on my CF4850's. Only exception is Crysis because the engine just sucks.
    Last edited by RickCain; 06-23-2008 at 06:23 AM.

  24. #49
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spain, EU
    Posts
    2,949
    Quote Originally Posted by Donnie27 View Post
    I'd much rather they used a 512 mega bit bus to either that 512MB or 1GB of RAM. It will end up choking when compared to other 512mb cards. Doesn't mean it will suck but it wil be like running WinXP with 1GB of RAM instead of 2GB.
    Not at all, it doesn't matter if it's 2GHz GDDR3@512bit bus or 4GHz GDDR5@256 bit bus, the amount of bandwidth is the same, and nothing else matters. Once you have that, the amount of Mb per GDDR chip also doesn't matter as long as the bandwidth/latency is the same.

    Availability and price of 1024Mb GDDR5 chips should be a great inconvenient, I'm sure ATI wanted to have 1GB cards at launch.
    Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)


    Quote Originally Posted by PerryR, on John Fruehe (JF-AMD) View Post
    Pretty much. Plus, he's here voluntarily.

  25. #50
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,046
    Quote Originally Posted by RickCain View Post
    Hardly....... I have ZERO problems playing any of my games at 1920X1200 w/ 8AA and 16AF on my CF4850's. Only exception is Crysis because the engine just sucks.
    lol so you too want to argue/oppose me..

    im talking single 512MB

    2 x 512MB is not same

Page 2 of 16 FirstFirst 1234512 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •