- i7 920 D0 // eVGA X58 SLI // 12GB G.Skill Ripjaws // HD6950 (6970 BIOS)
- Apogee XT // MCP655 // Thermochill PA120.3 // CM HAF 932
- OCZ Vertex 3 MI edition // ASUS Xonar DX // Corsair TX850
- HTC Incredible - Uber Kingdom Revolution ROM
um the first pic clearly shows the PCI bracket and a solid pcb where the crossfire link would be. I see no traces or solder points there either.
heatware chew*
I've got no strings to hold me down.
To make me fret, or make me frown.
I had strings but now I'm free.
There are no strings on me
How much more are the 1gb versions supposed to run? I thought that 4870 was 1gb period, I didn't know they were first going to have a 512mb variant (at the price point I was thinking for 1gb). Now I'm really not sure what to do. The 260 and 280 don't seem worth the money to me, and the 4850 simply isn't a big enough of a performance increase coming from an 8800gt. Guess I'll just have to wait for some reviews, but I'm tired I waiting.
E8400 @ 3600mhz
4870 @ 790/1100
2x2GB DDR2
Do want.Originally Posted by Expreview
But with 1GB.
Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)
![]()
We were debating ATI vs. nVidia max quality no AA 1920 x 1080, not nVidia vs. nVidia high quality 4xAA 1920 x 1080.
Also, Napalm, we never said an ATI card with less VRAM would automatically run a max quality high-res game heroically, the meaning was that an ATI card would generally do better at higher resolutions than a comparable nVidia card. Perhaps we should have been more specific.
Doesn't really show it that clearly, the bracket is still sort of in the way. Not a clear shot of the top, I'd still like a better picture.
- i7 920 D0 // eVGA X58 SLI // 12GB G.Skill Ripjaws // HD6950 (6970 BIOS)
- Apogee XT // MCP655 // Thermochill PA120.3 // CM HAF 932
- OCZ Vertex 3 MI edition // ASUS Xonar DX // Corsair TX850
- HTC Incredible - Uber Kingdom Revolution ROM
512MB just isnt enough for 1920 rez be it ati/nvidia
illogical? maybe those of you not running high rez.. why u guys arguing with those of us @ high rez?
i can go back 5 years.. hell ill go back 10 years @ warzone 2100
your ati/nvidia 512MB craps itself @ 1920
Just gonna pop in for a quick question: Do you guys think it's relevant that a card is faster at 1920x1200 with AA enabled etc. than another card, yet the absolute framerate isn't playable anyway?
Click the link, they stripped the card and there are CF connections present.
Member of Overclockers.com Folding @ Home team
"<The_Coolest> you can't unwaste wasted CPU cycles" - Start FOLDing now!
Main rig:
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X / Mobo: Asrock Fatal1ty X470 / EVO 970 500GB + WD Blue 250GB + HDD / GPU: Dell RX 570 4GB / Mem: 2x16GB DDR4-3200 G.Skill 32GTZKW TridentZ - 32GB total / PSU: Seasonic Prime Ultra Gold 650W
Secondary rigs:
Core i7 2600K 3.4GHz @ 4.3GHz (Scythe Mugen2) / Mobo: Biostar TP67XE / 2x Inland Pro 120GB / GPU: HD5450 / Mem: 4x4GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 8GBXL RipJawsX - 16GB total / PSU: Seasonic S12II 620W.
Core i3 540 3.06GHz @ 4.0GHz (Freezer 7 Pro) / Mobo: MSI H55M-ED55 / GPU: Integrated / Mem: 4x2GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 4GBRL RipJaws - 8GB total / PSU: Antec 380W.
Core Temp - Accurate temperature monitor for Intel's Core/Core 2 and AMD64 processors
chuckles; it's like you can now have 150fps+ in some games or <20fps in others, much the same as before.
look; if i was buying now id have a 4850 bang for buck,
and nitpicking the neck and neck perf. of the 4870 and a 9800gtx+...
i think the gtx260 will beat 4870, but i'll be pleasantly surprised if it is the other way around, cos the gtx2xx's are pretty darn expensive
ati have just played catchup with the g92 series, which means they should gain significant marketshare, but really they've only matched wot nv has had for a long while.
will 4870 dominate the g92's? , and yet sit under gt200.
i wish there were some graphs and such for 4870 already.
Last edited by adamsleath; 06-23-2008 at 05:26 AM.
i7 3610QM 1.2-3.2GHz
Looks like a decent stock cooler, at least compared to the RV670 heatsink. How thick are those heatpipes? Looks at least 8mm
Interesting results from the Techreport review. Have not seen it before and its making me think twice on waiting for the 1GB cards. I game at 1920x1080
'Gaming' AMD FX-6300 @ 4.5GHz | Asus M5A97 | 16GB DDR3 2133MHz | GTX760 2GB + Antec Kuhler620 mod | Crucial m4 64GB + WD Blue 2x1TB Str
'HTPC' AMD A8-3820 @ 3.5GHz | Biostar TA75A+ | 4GB DDR3 | Momentus XT 500GB | Radeon 7950 3GB
'Twitch' AMD 720BE @ 3.5GHz | Gigabyte GA-78LMT-S2P | 4GB DDR3 | Avermedia Game Broadcaster
Desktop Audio: Optical Out > Matrix mini DAC > Virtue Audio ONE.2 > Tannoy Reveal Monitors + Energy Encore 8 Sub
HTPC: Optoma HD131XE Projector + Yamaha RX-V463 + 3.2 Speaker Setup
Its not just about the v-ram, in general the 9800gtx takes a far harder hit than the 4850 (which mind you has less bandwidth and same amount of memory) which goes to show that it also is about how much back end power the g80 cards have (which is good for ati since their 800 shaders has proved to be more than enough for aa)
Last edited by Donnie27; 06-23-2008 at 11:11 AM. Reason: Removed mega LOL!
or perhaps it's just memory bandwidth limited...
and the fact of the matter is, if you had an 8800ultra, the frame rate is so darned low you'de be reducing settings anyway.
and the second example shows a 3870x2 beating a 8800ultra... observe how the 3870 only has 512mb addressable space...
Last edited by xlink; 06-23-2008 at 05:28 AM.
Well, going from 512MB to 1GB on a RV670 made absolutely no difference, not even on a 25x16 res. Just check this review:
http://techreport.com/articles.x/14654
Not sure how that will translate to what an RV770 will do with the extra RAM.
EDIT: @Hornet331: How is it possible for the 3870 to be faster than a 9800GTX on those settings? Especially in crysis which generally favors the NVIDIA cards.
Last edited by Helmore; 06-23-2008 at 05:39 AM.
"When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman
Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |
Considering how well the 4850 does with 512mb @ 1920x1200 or 2560x1600, I doubt 512->1Gb will make that much of a difference for the 4870.
I think the future headroom for a 4870 can be useful, I don't think it will mater to anyone whom will dispose of his card when something better for the price comes around. Like a next year refresh for example.
1GB is probably pretty useless on a 4850 though.
"When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman
Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |
Yeah I know ^^ , i was just saying that I have not seen the review until reading this thread, not the other way around. I just woke up!
'Gaming' AMD FX-6300 @ 4.5GHz | Asus M5A97 | 16GB DDR3 2133MHz | GTX760 2GB + Antec Kuhler620 mod | Crucial m4 64GB + WD Blue 2x1TB Str
'HTPC' AMD A8-3820 @ 3.5GHz | Biostar TA75A+ | 4GB DDR3 | Momentus XT 500GB | Radeon 7950 3GB
'Twitch' AMD 720BE @ 3.5GHz | Gigabyte GA-78LMT-S2P | 4GB DDR3 | Avermedia Game Broadcaster
Desktop Audio: Optical Out > Matrix mini DAC > Virtue Audio ONE.2 > Tannoy Reveal Monitors + Energy Encore 8 Sub
HTPC: Optoma HD131XE Projector + Yamaha RX-V463 + 3.2 Speaker Setup
Stock cooler looks very nice. Would be interesting to see a 512MB vs 1GB comparision of these cards.
Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs
If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place
You guys hate that fan? I LOVE that fan on my 2900pro. If it didnt have it there would be no way I could hit the overclocks I do. You dont HAVE to run it loud, it just an option if you want to clock higher on the stock cooler!
E7200 @ 4.0ghz 1.29vcore
2x 6870
OCZ 4gb @ 5-4-4-12 846mhz
Not at all, it doesn't matter if it's 2GHz GDDR3@512bit bus or 4GHz GDDR5@256 bit bus, the amount of bandwidth is the same, and nothing else matters. Once you have that, the amount of Mb per GDDR chip also doesn't matter as long as the bandwidth/latency is the same.
Availability and price of 1024Mb GDDR5 chips should be a great inconvenient, I'm sure ATI wanted to have 1GB cards at launch.
Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)
![]()
Bookmarks