Nehalem-EP......BLOOMFIELD

[GoThr3k]

There is a massive difference on Intel and AMD marketing lately on that point.

There is 2.66 and 2.93Ghz ES samples out. Plus Intel easily shows off 3.2Ghz and alot higher.

AMD had what speed barcelonas out? And only 1 single 3Ghz that was basicly locked away. Not to talk about the endless FUD slides of how fast it was compared to Core 2s. 50% faster!!!

3Ghz+ is not even a challenge for Nehalems.

where?

[Shintai]

where?

http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/03/i...d-at-computex/

http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/37781/135/

But seriously, with ES samples out at 2.93Ghz. You really have any doubt?

[GoThr3k]

http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/03/i...d-at-computex/

http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/37781/135/

But seriously, with ES samples out at 2.93Ghz. You really have any doubt?

thats not 3.2GHZ+, but doesnt matter

i dont have any doubt i believe nehalem will OC pretty nicely, my point was just that sometimes not all our dreams or hopes come true, remember phenom....
but some people don't even bother to read that, they just make fun of someone's opinion, even an XS moderator, retardation of society i think

[Movieman]

thats not 3.2GHZ+, but doesnt matter

i dont have any doubt i believe nehalem will OC pretty nicely, my point was just that sometimes not all our dreams or hopes come true, remember phenom....
but some people don't even bother to read that, they just make fun of someone's opinion, even an XS moderator, retardation of society i think

When the Clovertowns first came out they were limited to 2667 tops.
remember, this was December 2006.
The heat issue was killing anyone not on top water or phase.
No one was getting over 3000 on air because of crap heatsinks available back then. I got lucky and matched some Dynatron H46G's to some vantec tornadoes and was able to get 3157 stable and 3258 for benching on air.
Now if some dumb smuck like me can do that then some of the top people in the world are getting a crapload more than 3000 out of the Nehalems.
I rest my case

[GoThr3k]

When the Clovertowns first came out they were limited to 2667 tops.
remember, this was December 2006.
The heat issue was killing anyone not on top water or phase.
No one was getting over 3000 on air because of crap heatsinks available back then. I got lucky and matched some Dynatron H46G's to some vantec tornadoes and was able to get 3157 stable and 3258 for benching on air.
Now if some dumb smuck like me can do that then some of the top people in the world are getting a crapload more than 3000 out of the Nehalems.
I rest my case

your point being?

i dont see any relevance with this, and the thing i posted...
maybe you should become politician, they also start talking about something else....

[Movieman]

your point being?

i dont see any relevance with this, and the thing i posted...
maybe you should become politician, they also start talking about something else....

You don't see any relevance because it suits your position to ignore the relevance.
The relevance is that your saying "show me" clocks over 3000mhz on Nehalem.
My point is and was that if I could clock the clovers way beyond what was seen at the start of release on them then certainly others with greater skills than myself are clocking Nehalem to over 3000mhz and screen shots I've seen bear out my point.
Nehalem has been run to over 3000mhz even if you haven't seen it yourself.

[GoThr3k]

You don't see any relevance because it suits your position to ignore the relevance.
The relevance is that your saying "show me" clocks over 3000mhz on Nehalem.
My point is and was that if I could clock the clovers way beyond what was seen at the start of release on them then certainly others with greater skills than myself are clocking Nehalem to over 3000mhz and screen shots I've seen bear out my point.
Nehalem has been run to over 3000mhz even if you haven't seen it yourself.

so when someone says there is proof about 3.2ghz+ nehalems, i may not doubt him..... owkee, i get your point of view, shintai is your friend, not ask too much of him, noo, don't let him show any proof of his argument, way to go, now where not even allowed to doubt a statement

I don't even want to explain my point for the 3th time....

[Donnie27]

thats not 3.2GHZ+, but doesnt matter

i dont have any doubt i believe nehalem will OC pretty nicely, my point was just that sometimes not all our dreams or hopes come true, remember phenom....
but some people don't even bother to read that, they just make fun of someone's opinion, even an XS moderator, retardation of society i think

I get what you're saying, you're seeing it from a Phenom prospective, AMD hoodwinked folks. Maybe you're thinking Intel will do the same, that's possible but not likely. The problem is Intel can be scumbags enough to do it but because it is not in their best interests, more than likely they'll not! Sure if Intel needed to, they lie or try to pull a fast one just like AMD did.

The first Spec test exposed K-10 BTW. "AMD was already faster at that test". Overclocking isn't about a dream come true. It's about credible folks getting their hands on them and passing on that info. MovieMan was trusted before he became a Mod and folks like FuD have proven that they can't be trusted.

[ryboto]

http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/03/i...d-at-computex/

http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/37781/135/

But seriously, with ES samples out at 2.93Ghz. You really have any doubt?

In both of those articles, neither system revealed the true core speed...still speculation. So, I don't see why you would be providing it as fact to support your position. Out of curiosity, do you have links to any information regarding the 2.93ghz ES chips?