Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Intel Nehalem to allow overclocking, some processors will even encourage it

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    above USA...below USSR
    Posts
    1,186

    Intel Nehalem to allow overclocking, some processors will even encourage it

    "Taipei (Taiwan) - Hot on the heels of AMD's overclocking secret, we can reveal that Bloomfield and Lynnfield, key processors of Intel’s upcoming Nehalem family, will indeed feature overclocking capabilities for up to eight CPU cores (16 threads).

    Credible information we were able to obtain from industry sources suggest that rumors about Intel preventing users from overclocking Nehalem processors are false. From what we have learned, Intel has very healthy silicon on its hands. It appears that there are some challenges related to overclocking, especially in the memory controller area. However, it is unlikely that there will be anything that prevents overclocking of the CPU cores.

    Core 3, or whatever Intel decides to call the desktop Nehalem CPU, will be available as an Extreme Edition variant again, which is ready to elevate the performance bar. At the very high-end, Intel is currently "investigating the development of the successor of its super-expensive V8 Skulltrail platform. This time around, your Windows Task Manager will see 16 cores and not just eight (8 cores, 16 threads).

    Bloomfield is Intel's high-end part, featuring a 192-bit DDR3-1333 and DDR2-1600 memory controller. DDR3-1600 support is still unofficial at this point, since Intel is waiting for JEDEC ratification. Lynnfield is the mainstream desktop part, which will feature a more conventional 128-bit memory controller.

    Time will tell what Intel's Bloomfield overclocking potential really is. It will be interesting to see what Fugger, Coolaler, Kinc, Shamino (apologies to the ones I forgot to mention here, but we can't keep track of all those nicks) and the rest of OC community can do when Bloomfield gets frozen to -100 degrees Celsius or even less than that. We will try to find out is final silicon immune to the infamous "cold bug" or not.

    When Nehalem comes to life, you can expect that our usual suspects will have overclocking motherboards ready - and Intel will have overclockable CPUs."

    source; http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/37824/135/

    w00t
    Case-Coolermaster Cosmos S
    MoBo- ASUS Crosshair IV
    Graphics Card-XFX R9 280X [out for RMA] using HD5870
    Hard Drive-Kingston 240Gig V300 master Seagate 160Gb slave Seagate 250Gb slave Seagate 500Gb slave Western Digital 500Gb
    CPU-AMD FX-8320 5Ghz
    RAM 8Gig Corshair c8
    Logitech 5.1 Z5500 BOOST22
    300Gb of MUSICA!!


    Steam ID: alphamonkeywoman
    http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/933ab/

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,356
    I do hope this is true and that the other rumors saying Nahalem will only be overclockable in the "extreme editions" are false.

    I really don't think that overclocking harms Intel in any way and yet at the same time I think that it helps generate buzz for them. When people see "XXXXX world record broken with Ln2 cooled Intel chip!" that is good PR IMO. Wouldn't make much sense for them to severely limit OC'ing frankly.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ace Deuce, Michigan
    Posts
    3,955
    heh, good bye amd, it was nice knowing you
    Quote Originally Posted by Hans de Vries View Post

    JF-AMD posting: IPC increases!!!!!!! How many times did I tell you!!!

    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    .....}
    until (interrupt by Movieman)


    Regards, Hans

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    119
    Glad intel still cares about overclocking.

    I was starting to get afraid of these "no overclock on nahalem" news over the internet.
    Q6600@3,8ghz Asus Blitz Formula SE, 2gb gskill hk 4-4-3-5 @950mhz, EVGA 9800GTX+


  5. #5
    Coat It with GOOOO
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,608
    All Bloomfield's will be able to scale by increasing the QPI reference clock. Lynnfield might still be limited to only OC'ing through unlocked multiplyers, as I'm still under the opion that there isn't really any reference clock that is accesable to the motherboard.
    Main-- i7-980x @ 4.5GHZ | Asus P6X58D-E | HD5850 @ 950core 1250mem | 2x160GB intel x25-m G2's |
    Wife-- i7-860 @ 3.5GHz | Gigabyte P55M-UD4 | HD5770 | 80GB Intel x25-m |
    HTPC1-- Q9450 | Asus P5E-VM | HD3450 | 1TB storage
    HTPC2-- QX9750 | Asus P5E-VM | 1TB storage |
    Car-- T7400 | Kontron mini-ITX board | 80GB Intel x25-m | Azunetech X-meridian for sound |


  6. #6
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,447
    Hang on I thought Nehalem was DDR3 only and I've only ever seen DDR3 boards, and it talks about DDR2?
    i5-750 w/ Thermalright Ultra120X
    Coolermaster HAF-932
    MSI GD65
    2x2GB G.skill Cas7 1600MHz
    Sapphire HD6870
    Western Digital 640GB.AAKS
    2x Samsung F1 1TB
    2x Samsung SLC 64GB SSD
    Pioneer DVR-212BK
    Corsair HX620W
    Creative X-Fi Xtreme Music (dead, using onboard -.-)
    LG W2286L

  7. #7
    Coat It with GOOOO
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,608
    Quote Originally Posted by LuckyNV View Post
    Hang on I thought Nehalem was DDR3 only and I've only ever seen DDR3 boards, and it talks about DDR2?
    I'm pretty sure that's a typo as JDEC is probably not going to standardize DDR2-1600
    Main-- i7-980x @ 4.5GHZ | Asus P6X58D-E | HD5850 @ 950core 1250mem | 2x160GB intel x25-m G2's |
    Wife-- i7-860 @ 3.5GHz | Gigabyte P55M-UD4 | HD5770 | 80GB Intel x25-m |
    HTPC1-- Q9450 | Asus P5E-VM | HD3450 | 1TB storage
    HTPC2-- QX9750 | Asus P5E-VM | 1TB storage |
    Car-- T7400 | Kontron mini-ITX board | 80GB Intel x25-m | Azunetech X-meridian for sound |


  8. #8
    Xtreme Enthusiast Natalia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    703
    Best news in a while
    Windows 10 - x64
    Intel i7 3930k Sandy Bridge-E @ 4.20GHz
    ASUS Rampage IV Formula
    16 GB G.Skill Ripjaws 2133
    2x EVGA GeForce 1080 Ti : SLi
    Samsung 840 EVO
    70'' Vizio @ 2160x3840
    3x 30" Dell @ 2560x1600
    ASUS Xonar DG
    SteelSeries Arctis Wireless Pro

  9. #9
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Arizona, USA
    Posts
    1,700
    Quote Originally Posted by AliG View Post
    heh, good bye amd, it was nice knowing you
    Unfortunatly, this begins to shine more true day by day.

    Though, I really wonder if the IMC will hamper overclocking to some extent?


    Core i7 920 D0 B-batch (4.1) (Kinda Stable?) | DFI X58 T3eH8 (Fed up with its' issues, may get a new board soon) | Patriot 1600 (9-9-9-24) (for now) | XFX HD 4890 (971/1065) (for now) |
    80GB X25-m G2 | WD 640GB | PCP&C 750 | Dell 2408 LCD | NEC 1970GX LCD | Win7 Pro | CoolerMaster ATCS 840 {Modded to reverse-ATX, WC'ing internal}

    CPU Loop: MCP655 > HK 3.0 LT > ST 320 (3x Scythe G's) > ST Res >Pump
    GPU Loop: MCP655 > MCW-60 > PA160 (1x YL D12SH) > ST Res > BIP 220 (2x YL D12SH) >Pump

  10. #10
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    273
    on the high-end segment I was sure intel would never cut the overclocking possibility, but I wanna hear more about the main-stream/low-end.

    Core 2 series you can overclock any cpu, some higher some lower...
    C2Q QX6800@ 3.75GHz (375x10 - 1.450v) - L725A - G0
    4GB PC2-5300 Kingston Micron D9@ 3-4-4-10 750MHz 1:1
    Asus P5E-Deluxe - no mods
    eVGA 9600gso G92 + XFX 8500 GT (physics)
    H4ck3d-Slackware 11.0
    kernel-2.6.22.1@MCORE2 Arch Optimized

  11. #11
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,264
    Quote Originally Posted by Genius_pt View Post
    Glad intel still cares about overclocking.

    I was starting to get afraid of these "no overclock on nahalem" news over the internet.
    I was sure this would never of happened. The Core 2s wouldn't be so popular among gamers/benchers if they didn't have the head room they do. I'm sure the Phenom's would be more attractive if they could clock high as well and as they don't you've seen how popular they've been.
    Feedanator 7.0
    CASE:R5|PSU:850G2|CPU:i7 6850K|MB:x99 Ultra|RAM:8x4 2666|GPU:980TI|SSD:BPX256/Evo500|SOUND:2i4/HS8
    LCD:XB271HU|OS:Win10|INPUT:G900/K70 |HS/F:H115i

  12. #12
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,755
    Quote Originally Posted by ColonelCain View Post
    Unfortunatly, this begins to shine more true day by day.

    Though, I really wonder if the IMC will hamper overclocking to some extent?


    Quote Originally Posted by Monkeywoman View Post
    "Taipei (Taiwan) - Hot on the heels of AMD's overclocking secret, we can reveal that Bloomfield and Lynnfield, key processors of Intel’s upcoming Nehalem family, will indeed feature overclocking capabilities for up to eight CPU cores (16 threads).

    Credible information we were able to obtain from industry sources suggest that rumors about Intel preventing users from overclocking Nehalem processors are false. From what we have learned, Intel has very healthy silicon on its hands. It appears that there are some challenges related to overclocking, especially in the memory controller area. However, it is unlikely that there will be anything that prevents overclocking of the CPU cores.

    Core 3, or whatever Intel decides to call the desktop Nehalem CPU, will be available as an Extreme Edition variant again, which is ready to elevate the performance bar. At the very high-end, Intel is currently "investigating the development of the successor of its super-expensive V8 Skulltrail platform. This time around, your Windows Task Manager will see 16 cores and not just eight (8 cores, 16 threads).

    Bloomfield is Intel's high-end part, featuring a 192-bit DDR3-1333 and DDR2-1600 memory controller. DDR3-1600 support is still unofficial at this point, since Intel is waiting for JEDEC ratification. Lynnfield is the mainstream desktop part, which will feature a more conventional 128-bit memory controller.

    Time will tell what Intel's Bloomfield overclocking potential really is. It will be interesting to see what Fugger, Coolaler, Kinc, Shamino (apologies to the ones I forgot to mention here, but we can't keep track of all those nicks) and the rest of OC community can do when Bloomfield gets frozen to -100 degrees Celsius or even less than that. We will try to find out is final silicon immune to the infamous "cold bug" or not.

    When Nehalem comes to life, you can expect that our usual suspects will have overclocking motherboards ready - and Intel will have overclockable CPUs."

    source; http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/37824/135/

    w00t
    Seems like an IMC is indeed not an OC friendly feature.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •