Page 1 of 13 123411 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 324

Thread: Anandtech benches Nehalem

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    116

  2. #2
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Ankara Turkey
    Posts
    2,631


    When i'm being paid i always do my job through.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    707
    If those numbers hold up and are indicative of the final silicon, which seems plausible, AMD is cooked. They will have no where left to hide, unless they plan on selling their top end CPU's for $50.

    Maybe I'm over reacting.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    116
    I'm amazed at how Intel is able to improve upon Conroe so fast. Conroe is already a high IPC beast. To go above that by leaps and bounds is simply amazing. I'm speechless.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Belgium, Dendermonde
    Posts
    1,292
    too bad they didnt test any single threaded bench

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    707
    Quote Originally Posted by GoThr3k View Post
    too bad they didnt test any single threaded bench
    Why would they do that? That would be like testing a high performance V8 with 7 spark plugs removed.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Guru adamsleath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    3,803
    yerp. thx for article.
    i7 3610QM 1.2-3.2GHz

  8. #8
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Oslo, Norway
    Posts
    1,218
    the performance is good, now we just need some overclocking results!

  9. #9
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    2,207
    AMD is looking more and more cooked everyday. If intel positions their current releases as mid to low end and nehalem as the top end, AMD will become Cyrix(uncompetitive chips at all ends). And with AMD current financial situation, that could mean death for both AMD and ATI. With Intel's direct attack on NV works and if larabee's a crazy monster, it will have basically a monopoly on everything. I am probaly overreacting(especially the Larabee thing), but core 2 decimated AMD into a shell of its formerself. Another attack like that AMD will never survive.

    Hail to the new monopoly of INTEL

    Anyways why is Larabee supposed to be such a monster. On XS its hyped to be the second coming of christ. I haven't heard anything about it for performance.

  10. #10
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Stavanger , Norway
    Posts
    383
    Yeeeez, oh god! Ill take two to go please!

  11. #11
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    149
    OMG it's incredible look at raw power 3d rendering from 25-40% WHOA

  12. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    707
    I hear a giant sucking sound, the sound of AMD's hopes of survival going down the drain.

    I for one don't welcome my new Intel overlords.

  13. #13
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Smoked and baked! I hope the power consumption can be tweaked, even tho its still alot better performance/watt.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    70
    Intel's new toy is even faster then i thought.

  15. #15
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Frederick, MD
    Posts
    513
    The ATI branch will get sold off and keep truckin just fine.
    Core i5 750 3.8ghz, TRUE 120 w/Panaflo M1A 7v
    ASRock P55 Deluxe
    XFX 5870
    2x2GB GSkill Ripjaw DDR3-1600
    Samsung 2233RZ - Pioneer PDP-5020FD - Hyundai L90D+
    Raptor WD1500ADFD - WD Caviar Green 1.5TB
    X-FI XtremeMusic w/ LN4962
    Seasonic S12-500
    Antec P182

  16. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    707
    2 Things. This is not final silicon or platform, so in theory performance should improve. Secondly, why is there an entire tube of TIM on the CPU.

  17. #17
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    We had access to a 2.66GHz Nehalem for the longest time, unfortunately the motherboard it was paired with had some serious issues with memory performance. Not only was there no difference between single and triple channel memory configurations, memory latency was high. We know this was a board specific issue since our second Nehalem platform didn't exhibit any issues. Unfortunately we didn't have access to the more mature platform for very long at all, meaning the majority of our tests had to be run on the first setup (never fear, Nehalem is fast enough that it didn't end up mattering
    All tests run with high latency and singlechannel? :x
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  18. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    707
    So Hector, whatcha gonna do now? AMD has a few rabbits to pull out of their hat, right?

  19. #19
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Vegas ,NV
    Posts
    1,636
    looks awesome. I was a convert to Intel only 2n half years ago. I hope to see AMD throw in on this withbobcat for the mobile arena and whatever wild animal name chips they have coming up..forgot the names..

    tomcat?

    AMD get it together
    ~

  20. #20
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    3,080
    Well well, Intel certainly wants AMD gone...don't they?
    Gigabyte EP45-DQ6 - rev 1.0, F13a bios | Intel Q9450 Yorkfield 413x8=3.3GHz | OCZ ProXStream 1000W PSU | Azuen X-Fi Prelude 64MB X-RAM| WD VelociRaptor 74HLFS-01G6U0 16MB cache 74GB - 2 drive RAID 0 64k stripe | ASUS 9800GT Ultimate 512MB RAM (128 SP!!) | G.SKILL PC2-8800 4GB kit @ 1100MHz | OCZ ATV Turbo 4GB USB flash | Scythe Ninja Copper + Scythe 120mm fan | BenQ M2400HD 24" 16:9 LCD | Plextor 716SA 0308; firmware 1.11 | Microsoft Wireless Entertainment Desktop 8000 | Netgear RangeMax DG834PN 108mbps; firmware 1.03.39 + HAWKING HWUG1 108mbps USB dongle | Digital Doc 5+ | 7 CoolerMaster 80mm blue LED fans | Aopen H700A tower case | Vista Home Premium - 32bit, SP1

  21. #21
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    51
    I'm not suprised about this , it's been 2years sincs conroe so, normal speed boost and not impressed at all

  22. #22
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    川崎市
    Posts
    2,076
    The Emperor has arrived, well almost, good to see that we have a solid speed bump incomming.

  23. #23
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    3,080
    I just pray that (like alot of ES chips) performance dosen't go down, it's happened before!....all this early stuff gets us all excited but then you get retail and performance is half what early numbers suggested.
    Gigabyte EP45-DQ6 - rev 1.0, F13a bios | Intel Q9450 Yorkfield 413x8=3.3GHz | OCZ ProXStream 1000W PSU | Azuen X-Fi Prelude 64MB X-RAM| WD VelociRaptor 74HLFS-01G6U0 16MB cache 74GB - 2 drive RAID 0 64k stripe | ASUS 9800GT Ultimate 512MB RAM (128 SP!!) | G.SKILL PC2-8800 4GB kit @ 1100MHz | OCZ ATV Turbo 4GB USB flash | Scythe Ninja Copper + Scythe 120mm fan | BenQ M2400HD 24" 16:9 LCD | Plextor 716SA 0308; firmware 1.11 | Microsoft Wireless Entertainment Desktop 8000 | Netgear RangeMax DG834PN 108mbps; firmware 1.03.39 + HAWKING HWUG1 108mbps USB dongle | Digital Doc 5+ | 7 CoolerMaster 80mm blue LED fans | Aopen H700A tower case | Vista Home Premium - 32bit, SP1

  24. #24
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Croatia
    Posts
    2,542
    This is really more than I dared hope for!
    Incredible!!!
    Quote Originally Posted by LexDiamonds View Post
    Anti-Virus software is for n00bs.

  25. #25
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Dower View Post
    I just pray that (like alot of ES chips) performance dosen't go down, it's happened before!....all this early stuff gets us all excited but then you get retail and performance is half what early numbers suggested.
    Even if it goes down, im sure the performance will go up when memory latency aint high on a faulty board and running in singlechannel mode.

    Performance can only go up..

    I think a picture is in order.

    Last edited by Shintai; 06-05-2008 at 01:42 AM.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

Page 1 of 13 123411 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •