Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 40 of 40

Thread: New Phenom Developments and 45nm "Stars" Cores

  1. #26
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Vancouver,British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    1,178
    Great find Informal!
    I put my mouth (and maybe the money too)
    on the 9950,since AMD has a history of improving
    their CPU's with new batches/steppings.
    As for the future: how about a "star city'
    an AM3-desktop Opty, and some smart mobo
    maker to put out a dual socket baby. Pretty sure that DDR3 support is already "in". (unofficially)
    I am still waiting for the mobile K10's to hit the streets
    btw MSI calles Phenoms k9, sick dogs
    get your sh.t in one piece.


    World Community Grid's mission is to create the world's largest public computing grid to tackle projects that benefit humanity.
    Our success depends upon individuals collectively contributing their unused computer time to change the world for the better.

  2. #27
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    707
    Quote Originally Posted by awdrifter View Post
    I'll believe it when I see it.
    Same. I have a very hard time understanding how a new SB will give an existing chip higher stable clocks. Maybe a slight increase only.

    And even if it did give 300-400 Mhz more (which I HIGHLY doubt) the thermals will still be a major problem. Phenom at above 3Ghz really pumps out the heat.

    45nm Phenom's are a different story, who knows how they will clock. Traditionally, AMD's new process clocks slower than their previous on average, and it takes time for AMD to ramp up things.

  3. #28
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    I imagine that heat is going to end up being our limiting factor. It quite possibly plays a big role even now. If the chip is sucking down a max of 140W in worst-case at 2.6GHz or 125W at 2.5GHz, imagine what our chips at 3GHz+ are pulling (worst-case, once again). A CPU's efficiency is near 0%, after all. A CPU produces no light, no sound, no locomotion, etc. It almost all escapes as heat. That's a lot of heat to contend with, as we're all well-aware of right now.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  4. #29
    Xtremely High Voltage Sparky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    16,040
    Quote Originally Posted by Particle View Post
    I imagine that heat is going to end up being our limiting factor. It quite possibly plays a big role even now. If the chip is sucking down a max of 140W in worst-case at 2.6GHz or 125W at 2.5GHz, imagine what our chips at 3GHz+ are pulling (worst-case, once again). A CPU's efficiency is near 0%, after all. A CPU produces no light, no sound, no locomotion, etc. It almost all escapes as heat. That's a lot of heat to contend with, as we're all well-aware of right now.
    FWIW my opteron 165 when overclocked at 2.8GHz was close to 180W and kept cool enough with a larger air cooler (could keep it low 50's load). 140W+ isn't unmanageable. 3+GHz though I wonder how much juice the phenom will take... I think the 45nm shrink plus the different process should help drop that power consumption though.
    The Cardboard Master
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64

  5. #30
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Birmingham AL.
    Posts
    1,079
    My money is on the SB750. practicly everyone with a SB600/790fx board hit practicly the same OC limit on the phenoms. just hard to believe that all phenoms are exactly the same so most likely the South bridge.

  6. #31
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Reno, NV
    Posts
    110
    I hope they haev some SB600 & 790FX updates, I can't afford to update my mobo for awhile.

  7. #32
    D.F.I Pimp Daddy
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Still Lost At The Dead Show Parking Lot
    Posts
    5,182
    Quote Originally Posted by G0ldBr1ck View Post
    My money is on the SB750. practicly everyone with a SB600/790fx board hit practicly the same OC limit on the phenoms. just hard to believe that all phenoms are exactly the same so most likely the South bridge.
    Its not just the CPU's its the Limiting factor of the Motherboards as well.
    Personally it only stood to reason for me to believe right from the start that AMD First Motherboard as well as their first CPU would not be Mature 939 material that we were all used to.

    New Architecture is new Architecture and it is prone to growing pains just like breaking in a new pair of dress shoes

    This is why I don't lean on this Board and CPU like most do but then again this is the reason more then likely that I do not experience any of these problems either. I just realize you cannot make a 400 Horse Power Engine do 600 Horse Power its just logic allot do not seem to grasp this!
    Last edited by Brother Esau; 06-02-2008 at 09:24 PM.
    SuperMicro X8SAX
    Xeon 5620
    12GB - Crucial ECC DDR3 1333
    Intel 520 180GB Cherryville
    Areca 1231ML ~ 2~ 250GB Seagate ES.2 ~ Raid 0 ~ 4~ Hitachi 5K3000 2TB ~ Raid 6 ~

  8. #33
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    State of Confusion, USA
    Posts
    2,513
    Quote Originally Posted by Brother Esau View Post
    This is why I don't lean on this Board and CPU like most do but then again this is the reason more then likely that I do not experience any of these problems either. I just realize you cannot make a 400 Horse Power Engine do 600 Horse Power its just logic allot do not seem to grasp this!
    Yup... And if you do get that many horses out of it, expect the life span of an NHRA Dragster, NOT and Indy car...
    AMD FX-8350 (1237 PGN) | Asus Crosshair V Formula (bios 1703) | G.Skill 2133 CL9 @ 2230 9-11-10 | Sapphire HD 6870 | Samsung 830 128Gb SSD / 2 WD 1Tb Black SATA3 storage | Corsair TX750 PSU
    Watercooled ST 120.3 & TC 120.1 / MCP35X XSPC Top / Apogee HD Block | WIN7 64 Bit HP | Corsair 800D Obsidian Case








    First Computer: Commodore Vic 20 (circa 1981).

  9. #34
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    881
    Just like engines though, the K10 is like the F20C, it's maxed out from the factory, you won't get much more out of it, but the Core 2's are like the LS1, bolt ons, cam and a tune and you're at 400hp.

  10. #35
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    76
    Quote Originally Posted by Daveburt714 View Post
    Yup... And if you do get that many horses out of it, expect the life span of an NHRA Dragster, NOT and Indy car...
    well...so far i wasnt able to extract even 401 horsepower, so labeling it black edition was totally misleading by amd
    DFI 790FXB-M2RSH
    AMD Phenom II 940BE
    Crucial Ballistix 4GB 2+2 kit 800Mhz
    Thermaltake Toughpower 850W
    2x Powercolor 3870x2 CrossfireX 4GPU
    Vista 64-bit

  11. #36
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    EvE-Online, Tranquility
    Posts
    1,978
    Quote Originally Posted by d4d4cH View Post
    well...so far i wasnt able to extract even 401 horsepower, so labeling it black edition was totally misleading by amd
    You've like a plate in front of your face? You said this in like 2 other threads in here, and I told you twice now that AMD didnt mislead anyboy because they DID sell a Black Edition. The one and only feature the Black Edition gives is unlocked multipliers, no more, no less.

    Take a look at Athlon X2 Black Editions, they dont OC any better than there non Black Edition parts.

    Phenom ATM clocks for 99% crap, and we'll see how and if this changes by SB750. Please, that little bit of patience, how hard is that. Especially since it's the third time I told you this.

    I cant OC my Phenom either, you dont hear me complain. Im just patiently waiting for a better chipset. If that doesnt solve it (enough), Ill get another Phenom. In the end no OC is guaranteed and it's like a lottery. However, sometimes this lottery is very in our favor and the chance you get a bad clocker is very small (look at Opterons, Windsors, Intel etc). And sometimes this chance of a bad clocker is a bit larger.

    So what, it's all about the fun in the end. Sometimes frustrating, but fun most of the times. At this moment Im running it stock, it's a little drawback when running mostly single threaded programs compared to my X2 which ran 3.5Ghz, but well. It does the job and while waiting for SB750 Ive some fun playing games. Enjoy life, dont go em0 over such things.
    Synaptic Overflow

    CPU:
    -Intel Core i7 920 3841A522
    --CPU: 4200Mhz| Vcore: +120mV| Uncore: 3200Mhz| VTT: +100mV| Turbo: On| HT: Off
    ---CPU block: EK Supreme Acetal| Radiator: TCF X-Changer 480mm
    Motherboard:
    -Foxconn Bloodrage P06
    --Blck: 200Mhz| QPI: 3600Mhz
    Graphics:
    -Sapphire Radeon HD 4870X2
    --GPU: 750Mhz| GDDR: 900Mhz
    RAM:
    -3x 2GB Mushkin XP3-12800
    --Mhz: 800Mhz| Vdimm: 1.65V| Timings: 7-8-7-20-1T
    Storage:
    -3Ware 9650SE-2LP RAID controller
    --2x Western Digital 74GB Raptor RAID 0
    PSU:
    -Enermax Revolution 85+ 1250W
    OS:
    -Windows Vista Business x64


    ORDERED: Sapphire HD 5970 OC
    LOOKING FOR: 2x G.Skill Falcon II 128GB SSD, Windows 7

  12. #37
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    358
    AMD is very tight on info. so if there saying this then i believe it.

    So cant wait. will be great.

    Dont know about other but i am very happy with my perfomance on my set up. even at stock. allthough i do run mine @ 2.9ghz in vista 64 and 3.1ghz when i boot up in XPpro <<< wich is not very often.



  13. #38
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Vancouver,British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    1,178
    I don't know why so many people are whining and biatching about how Phenom
    this and Phenom that. Take a 6400+ Athlon for example , you set it to
    3.6 ghz (max for most) and they're go to heaven, it's a freaking dream come true, than the same people would take the 9850 and get it up 3.0ghz (average)
    and that's not enough they need more.
    In the first case the OC is 400mhz, in the second 500mhz ,where is the freaking problem here?

    Another example:
    I have a 939 Toledo 4400+ at work, the price was about 300 CAD at the time.
    That CPU will not go over 2.50 no matter what.
    I also have a 165 Opteron, which is basically the same chip with 2 "minor"
    differences: The price was 115 CAD and it over clocks to 3.00ghz with less than stock volts, the point being give AMD some time the same Phenoms in a year or so would be just like that Opty was in comparison to the Toledo.


    World Community Grid's mission is to create the world's largest public computing grid to tackle projects that benefit humanity.
    Our success depends upon individuals collectively contributing their unused computer time to change the world for the better.

  14. #39
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    460
    Jeesh, ever since I got the Prometia (now in semi retirement) I have been hovering around 3 gig/3gig+ with all the issues that AMD has put out in the last several years, they are kinda stuck in a rut. Sometimes a little more, sometimes a little less, at least when I was using it, I felt like I was getting some free MHZ feeling a little ahead of the AIR curve, usually a good 200 to 300+ MHZ on the total clockage.

    I will agree though, a 6400+ @3.5/3.6, running a 64bit OS (I prefer XP Pro 64) and mucho ramski (I got 8gig in the test bench unit), it doesn't get much better at present for AMD stuffs....I can't think of anything I do at present that requires more than two cores, that will change I am sure as programs and automatic affinity comes into play....

    If the new 750 Southbridge is all it is hyped to be (it is all hype to me right now), then maybe there is hope. 45nm may work well, but given the recent AMD track record, I ain't holdin' my breath....

    Laterzzzz......
    Asrock 970 Extreme4, Vishera 8320 @4.6Ghz, 1.39v, 16 gig Gskill RipJaws X DDR3 2133 @2284, OCZ 700w, OCZ Vetex 4 256gb boot, ATI 6850, all on big air..

    smoke and mirrors

  15. #40
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    44
    Neat, I know that the Sun Micro crowd have been verry pleased with the Phenom as of yet. Cant wait 'till the this next generation becomes available for home users
    1st rig
    Rebadged Lian-Li Alum server tower.
    DFI NF4 SLI-DR Rev A00 040B LLC - Current BIOS DFIs LDB14
    Opteron 165 LCB9E 0646RPMW @ 2.55GHz ( wont do 2,8 anymore )
    2nd rig
    Asus P5N-E, sinked mosfets and SB, lapped NB 1002 bi
    C2D E8400 Q810A056, testing 3.93GHz @1.34vC
    BFG 8800 GTS OC2 320mb 700/1000
    OCZ GameXstream 700w PSU
    OCZ PC28500 Reaper kit @ stock for time being
    Notebook LG R500 !!!
    T7500,2GB PC2 5300 5-5-5-15, 8600GT 256Mb
    3800s 3dmark06!!

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •