He didn't say that. He said that in any given competition, even if one contender seemingly wins all the time, there will still be occasions where the other contender will triumph given the right circumstances.
He didn't say one was better than the other, he didn't even try to predict how one contender will do. He simply attempted to answer the question posed in this thread: Why is this contender beating the other contender in this paticular area? The answer being, of course, that given the right circumstances any contender will win.
When coming into a discussion, please try to remain neutral and leave your own personal world view at the door. Otherwise it'll twist what you read and then make people think you're stupid because you seemingly can't read.




Reply With Quote

Bookmarks