MMM
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: "SSE4" (Yorkfield, Q9300) - Worth $55

  1. #1
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    720

    "SSE4" (Yorkfield, Q9300) - Worth $55

    Ave,

    I had a similar debate in another thread but I needed to attract people with SSE4 knowledge so I'm starting this thread.

    I'm upgrading my PC - and 80% of it's usage is Video Encoding. Primarily, TMPGEnc Xpress, WMV-HD Encoding. The post 11/07 release of TMPGEnc Xpress included SSE4 support.

    I will certainly be OC'ing whatever chip I get - but like I said - 80% of my system usage is Video Encoding and other video editing related tasks like container extraction, development, re-encode, inter-codec conversions etcetera.

    I was going to get the Q6600 but I'm considering Q9300 now. There's no doubts the Q6600 will OC more then the Q9300 - what I need to establish is whether the SSE4 performance gain (Q9300) will benefit more then the Clock Speed gain (Q6600).

    From what I understand - I can OC Q6600 on my P35/Air setup to a stable 3.4Ghz - 3.5Ghz ... and OC Q9300 to a stable 3.2Ghz. I don't think the 0.2Ghz difference is going to be immaculate - that considered - the difference is SSE4 - and I just don't know how much of a performance/speed I'll gain in my encoding with that.

    The cost difference is $55 - and I'm on a budget - so that difference is bit much for me. Do I really need to spend $55 and get the Q9300? Or will I not notice that big a difference, since the Q6600 will OC more?

    Anyone here who's actually experienced with SSE4/Video Encoding and it's benefits?

    Thanks!
    ~~ ++: Primary Rig :++ ~~

    Alienware M17x-r2 [SPACE BLACK]
    Core i7-820QM | 17" 1200p RGBLED LCD | 8 GB DDR3-1333MHz | Dual 1GB Crossfire ATI 5870 | 1TB Raid 0 (2x 500GB 7200RPM HDDs) | Blu-ray Reader + DVD-DL Burner | Intel Ultimate N WiFi Link 6300 | Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit | Alienware Messenger Bag | Razer Orochi Bluetooth

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,461
    With the L8XX batches, it's quite possible that the Q6600 won't get you as far. However, the extra cache could make up for that.
    1.7%

  3. #3
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    720
    Got the Q9450 after all the debate - more Cache then Q6600 + SSE4.
    ~~ ++: Primary Rig :++ ~~

    Alienware M17x-r2 [SPACE BLACK]
    Core i7-820QM | 17" 1200p RGBLED LCD | 8 GB DDR3-1333MHz | Dual 1GB Crossfire ATI 5870 | 1TB Raid 0 (2x 500GB 7200RPM HDDs) | Blu-ray Reader + DVD-DL Burner | Intel Ultimate N WiFi Link 6300 | Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit | Alienware Messenger Bag | Razer Orochi Bluetooth

  4. #4
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    17,242
    hi mate

    have you seen what nvidia is doing with CUDA porting video encoding

    with a bit of luck and some more software developers we will have some wider range of codecs ported to do encoding on GFX cards which are far superior

    have a look at the video i took during presentations comparing a CPU vs GPU encoding

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8C_Pj1Ep4nw

    you'll be buying 8000 or later series GFX card if you're after the right system

    quad will still help you in the mean time while we get someone to port divx and other codecs to CUDA
    Team.AU
    Got tube?
    GIGABYTE Australia
    Need a GIGABYTE bios or support?



  5. #5
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    720
    Quote Originally Posted by dinos22 View Post
    hi mate

    have you seen what nvidia is doing with CUDA porting video encoding

    with a bit of luck and some more software developers we will have some wider range of codecs ported to do encoding on GFX cards which are far superior

    have a look at the video i took during presentations comparing a CPU vs GPU encoding

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8C_Pj1Ep4nw

    you'll be buying 8000 or later series GFX card if you're after the right system

    quad will still help you in the mean time while we get someone to port divx and other codecs to CUDA
    Sounds very exciting! This is definately news - although it was take a while for this to become standard (with both Codecs & Software supporting this), but it should definately push HD Video Encoding a lot further. In the meantime, I think I should be able to derive much juice out of the Q9450 for my HD Video Encoding.
    ~~ ++: Primary Rig :++ ~~

    Alienware M17x-r2 [SPACE BLACK]
    Core i7-820QM | 17" 1200p RGBLED LCD | 8 GB DDR3-1333MHz | Dual 1GB Crossfire ATI 5870 | 1TB Raid 0 (2x 500GB 7200RPM HDDs) | Blu-ray Reader + DVD-DL Burner | Intel Ultimate N WiFi Link 6300 | Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit | Alienware Messenger Bag | Razer Orochi Bluetooth

  6. #6
    Xtreme Guru adamsleath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    3,803
    cuda should do all that stuff now if possible...surely? leaves cpu in the dust.
    i7 3610QM 1.2-3.2GHz

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •