MMM
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Q6600 vs Q9450: Is $140 Worth It?

Threaded View

  1. #5
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    720
    Quote Originally Posted by JumpingJack View Post
    The Q9450 is worth the extra money... for your application, a few reasons -- more cache, faster clock, cooler. But also SSE4, which some apps are now showing up compiled with the new instructions, this is worth 20-30% gain in many cases.

    I have a QX6700 which I can clock to 2.4 GHz and a QX9650 which I can clock to 2.66 GHz ... though I haven't strictly compared them yet in video encoding, I can if you like me to. Let me know, the rigs are set up... let me know what encoding you would like to see.

    Jack
    SSE4 is what is most concerning to me. The fact that Q6600 does not have that, and Q9xx does. In fact, for that matter, if the SSE4 can make that noticeable difference towards encoding, then the Q9300 isn't ruled out either. Considering the chip is just $50 more then Q6600.

    From what I gather, on my P35 setup, on air, I can OC the Q6600 to a stable 3.4GHz-3.5GHz, and the Q9300 to 3.2GHz. (Correct me if I'm wrong. That being the case, the 0.2-0.4GHz is most likely not going to be a HUGE difference. However, in case of video encoding, the SSE4 instructions "might" make the deciding difference.

    There is no denying that the Q6600 will OC a lot more then the Q9300 (Or Q9450) for that matter, but it will lack the SSE4 which may impact Video Encoding quite a bit more then the 0.2-0.4GHz (Again, correct me if I'm wrong on this).

    Quite honestly, this thread should be re-titled "SSE4 - Worth $50". I was considering the Q9450 earlier, but I don't thing I'll invest that much in the 45nm/Yorkfield for now - It'll either be Q6600 or Q9300 for now. I'll wait for Nehalem or even Sandy Bridge in about 2 years or so to replace whatever I buy now.

    But anyhow, now to determine between Q6600 or Q9300 - it all depends on approximately how much more performance/speed I can gain with the SSE4 - Which brings me to your speed-test offer.

    Can you possibly use the latest TMPGEnc Xpress (Which supports SSE4, post November, 2007 release) and encode an h.264 (MKV, MP4 container) to a WMV-HD (VC-1) Advanced Profile video and see if the SSE4 makes that drastic difference?

    I'll appreciate if you can get back to me on that.

    Thanks a ton!
    Last edited by LUCI5R; 05-29-2008 at 03:43 AM.
    ~~ ++: Primary Rig :++ ~~

    Alienware M17x-r2 [SPACE BLACK]
    Core i7-820QM | 17" 1200p RGBLED LCD | 8 GB DDR3-1333MHz | Dual 1GB Crossfire ATI 5870 | 1TB Raid 0 (2x 500GB 7200RPM HDDs) | Blu-ray Reader + DVD-DL Burner | Intel Ultimate N WiFi Link 6300 | Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit | Alienware Messenger Bag | Razer Orochi Bluetooth

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •