Is this 18th June launch a paper launch or will the cards be available in stores on the 18th ?
A low availability launch always sucks big time, hope decent numbers of physical cards are ready for release.
i7 4770K (EK-HF)
ASRock Z87 Professional Fatal1ty (BIOS L1.42)
Trident X F3-2400C10D-8GTX
GTX 480 SLI (Koolance NX-480) / E-MU 1212M / Antec Quattro 1.2kW / HP ZR30w / Lian Li 1010B
Cooling; TFC Xchanger 240 & RX360 / 655 w/EK-Top V2 / Tygon / BP Compressions
Dang. Searched and still can't find information regarding the bolt pattern around the GPU. Any chance old 8800/9800 air and water will mount on this new card?
Sourcing parts for a mildly over clocked abacus.
NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 280 will be impressive
Just wait until June 17th when the GTX 200 series of GPU's launch, and you'll start asking yourself when you last witnessed such a dramatic technology improvement. If you thought the GeForce 8 series blew the 7-series out of the water, this is going to leave you in shock. That's not my own marketing spin... Benchmark Reviews is presently testing the new GeForce video card.
Benchmarkreviews
Source : If that is true I'm going to faint. M-m-m-m-mooooonster card.
Bigger performance increase then from 7 series to 8!!!!!!
Intel Core i7-3770K
ASUS P8Z77-I DELUXE
EVGA GTX 970 SC
Corsair 16GB (2x8GB) Vengeance LP 1600
Corsair H80
120GB Samsung 840 EVO, 500GB WD Scorpio Blue, 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3
Corsair RM650
Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced
OC: 5Ghz | +0.185 offset : 1.352v
gundamit,
According to the leaked 3D model of the G200 cicuit board the centers of the mounting holes are 61mm apart so they aren't compatible with those on G80/G92 which are 54mm apart.
Last edited by largon; 05-25-2008 at 12:20 AM. Reason: duh
You were not supposed to see this.
Last edited by fornowagain; 05-25-2008 at 05:19 AM.
Yeah looks alright in this picture on the other one it seems bigger, or is it a case of a worse photoshop![]()
(if ya notice the weirdness in the shadow behind the CEO, seems something was chopped...)
Question : Why do some overclockers switch into d*ckmode when money is involved
Remark : They call me Pro AsusSaaya yupp, I agree
i gotta say, as a long time nv owner, who has never owned an ATI card, if the rumors turned out to be true that GTX 280 costs >$600USD ... the rumored 4870's $350USD price tag sounds very good
but then again, for 600 bux the GTX 280 might be another 8800GTX = long product life... arrrrgh hard to choose
wonder why they didnt have a 8900GTX that was done on 65nm and has higher core clock, and more ROP/shaders//TMU ..etc, like 7800 GTX 512/7900GTX vs 7800GTX 256
Last edited by Philip_J_Fry; 05-25-2008 at 05:35 AM.
"Thanks for the f-shack. Love, Dirty Mike & The Boys" - from Dirty Mike & The Boys
Can't have your cake and eat it too....
7800GTX-512 had higher clocks on the same process and ran hotter
7900GTX had higher clocks on a smaller process and ran cooler
Neither had an increase in any type of unit over the original 7800GTX-256.
Expecting a 8900GTX on the same 65nm process as G92 with both higher clocks and higher unit counts is a bit optimistic. G92 wasn't exactly sipping power.
Still, it looks like Nvidia came in 100Mhz shy of its target shader clock...1400Mhz would have taken them to the 1 Teraflop finish line.
fornowagain, thanks for the alternative picture. But even if the first one was shopped, based on yours I'd still say this thing is massive, even though the 4870x2 is going to be a huge chunk of copper, too.
But what I really wonder is how much energy this thing will suck while idling around. ~240w peak seems much, okay, but when they managed to keep the idle pwr draw to a minimum I'd be okay with it.
Don't act like a jerk please.Originally Posted by LordEC911
Don't know what made you say that, but it's definitely not beneficial for yourself, and surely not for another member of XS.
Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.
-Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.
Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P.), Juan J. Guerrero
here is coverage of Nvidias editors day 2008; http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.ph...=178&Itemid=46
taken right from article, "Video games are now seeing an added dependence on physics processing, just as well as GPU and CPU. GPU's Such as NVIDIA's upcoming GeForce graphics processor have shifted the dependence of video games onto the GPU, and added an on-board PhysX co-processor, it won't be long before the CPU really offers no level of performance for video games."
DAM!!
Case-Coolermaster Cosmos S
MoBo- ASUS Crosshair IV
Graphics Card-XFX R9 280X [out for RMA] using HD5870
Hard Drive-Kingston 240Gig V300 master Seagate 160Gb slave Seagate 250Gb slave Seagate 500Gb slave Western Digital 500Gb
CPU-AMD FX-8320 5Ghz
RAM 8Gig Corshair c8
Logitech 5.1 Z5500 BOOST22
300Gb of MUSICA!!
Steam ID: alphamonkeywoman
http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/933ab/
I find it funny that nvidia is highlighting piclens, an ok firefox plugin.
I trust DilTech and BenchZowner about GTX 280. Hope you are enjoying the toys!
Now games just needs to catch up...
@alig
yeah, i was just thinking exactly the same thing
especially the statement "on-board" makes that apparent (physix is not managed by the gpu, otherwise it would have been "on-die" or something like that)
after all, who would actually use a gt200 card inside a media center pc, there are cards taking only 1/10 of the electricity, are much quieter and cheaper, but still offer good hd support (if nvio is not integrated in the gpu, which i seriously doubt; only reason that thing is included is to make specs more impressive/ people using that card shure have a processor running hd without gpu support)
Last edited by clonez; 05-25-2008 at 08:18 AM.
system:
Phenom II 920 3.5Ghz @ 1.4v, benchstable @ over 3,6Ghz (didnt test higher)
xigmatek achilles
sapphire hd4870 1gb @ 820 1020
Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H
8gb a-data 4-4-4-12 800
x-fi xtrememusic
rip 2x 160gb maxtor(now that adds up to 4...)
320gb/250gb/500gb samsung
It's NVIO 2.0, not PhysX.
You were not supposed to see this.
A physx chip would also need aditional memory chips.
Physics on a GPU is still a joke and it wont change.
Reminds me, aint it about time to axe the analog outputs? (TV-Out). Everyone and their mother got DisplayPort/VGA/DVI/HDMI on their TV and equipment. With VGA being combined with one of the others usually.
Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
Intel Core i7 7700K | MSI Z270 XPOWER G.T. | EVGA 1080Ti SC2 | 16GB DDR4 G.Skill Trident Z 3200 | Samsung S27A950D | 3 x Samsung 850 EVO (250GB, 2 x 2TB) | EVGA Supernova P2 1200w | Coolermaster Cosmos II
I'm still wondering what's going on with Alan Wake... the website hasn't been updated since...well.
Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.
-Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.
Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P.), Juan J. Guerrero
Bookmarks