Just notices that the new maximus formula has FSB 1600Mhz while my old one only has FSB 1333Mhz , do you think the new 1600Mhz will perform better in fsb overclocking ? Planing to for either a new formula or a real x48 rampage![]()
Just notices that the new maximus formula has FSB 1600Mhz while my old one only has FSB 1333Mhz , do you think the new 1600Mhz will perform better in fsb overclocking ? Planing to for either a new formula or a real x48 rampage![]()
[SIGPIC]http://techsweden.org[/SIGPIC]
Gigabyte Z87X-OC, Haswell 4770K, 8GB Team Group 2666mhz, Asus HD7970
I wouldnt think too much different. The origional Maximus always did 1600~2000FSB out the box on first BIOS. It was CPU and dram tweaking that bottlenecked it. So if you're using a quad, not likely gonna see the FSB max of any of the current mobos. E6300 and E6850 users will see more of that then any of them.
However, it is showing that Quads can perform on lower FSB but tight NB timing, the trd "performance level".
My personal experience only really showed score increase, but not so much real worl gain over the traditional FSB OC, provided CPU can do it. Not to mention stability, mobo and chipset really need to be cranked up to match that PL tightening.
------------------
OK, it would appear nobody here can confirm, so can anybody link to info on the conpatability of real RF BIOS downloads v/s the ones posted here as to if they are actually different? I mean can the real ASUS RF v0403 be downloaded and hacked flashed to the MF, or is it spacifically written (hacked) to do that?
4.250GHz (1.331v) @ 212 x 21 @ 2:8 DDR1600 @ 6-7-6-18 (1.657) ASUS RAMPAGE EXTRENE w/ Q6600 @ 3.8Ghz daily
ASUS RAMPAGE II EXTREME, X58 w/ ICH10R
Intel Core i7 930, rev. DO, batch #3951A824
Mushkin Redline 998691 PC3-12800
ASUS ENGTX460 GTX-460 DirectCu 1G
Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal!ty Champion
SilverStone Strider ST80F 800W Quad 12v
WD Raptor 74GB, 10K x4
Danger Dan WaterBox Plus
Windows 7 Enterprise x64
Swiftech Apogee XT Copper Top w/ AS#5 (lapped to CPU)
I wouldnt think too much different. The origional Maximus always did 1600~2000FSB out the box on first BIOS. It was CPU and dram tweaking that bottlenecked it. So if you're using a quad, not likely gonna see the FSB max of any of the current mobos. E6300 and E6850 users will see more of that then any of them.
However, it is showing that Quads can perform on lower FSB but tight NB timing, the trd "performance level".
My personal experience only really showed score increase, but not so much real worl gain over the traditional FSB OC, provided CPU can do it. Not to mention stability, mobo and chipset really need to be cranked up to match that PL tightening.
------------------
OK, it would appear nobody here can confirm, so can anybody link to info on the conpatability of real RF BIOS downloads v/s the ones posted here as to if they are actually different? I mean can the real ASUS RF v0403 be downloaded and hacked flashed to the MF, or is it spacifically written (hacked) to do that?
Aslo, any word on if we can hack the BIOS ro jsut flash for new P5E3 Premium for use of multu CPU GTL_Ref on our MF?
4.250GHz (1.331v) @ 212 x 21 @ 2:8 DDR1600 @ 6-7-6-18 (1.657) ASUS RAMPAGE EXTRENE w/ Q6600 @ 3.8Ghz daily
ASUS RAMPAGE II EXTREME, X58 w/ ICH10R
Intel Core i7 930, rev. DO, batch #3951A824
Mushkin Redline 998691 PC3-12800
ASUS ENGTX460 GTX-460 DirectCu 1G
Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal!ty Champion
SilverStone Strider ST80F 800W Quad 12v
WD Raptor 74GB, 10K x4
Danger Dan WaterBox Plus
Windows 7 Enterprise x64
Swiftech Apogee XT Copper Top w/ AS#5 (lapped to CPU)
Bookmarks