OK , benching now with 1006 but it hasnt helped my clocks , Im still stuck at 400mhz max.
Hopefully ram will fix this tomorrow .
![]()
OK , benching now with 1006 but it hasnt helped my clocks , Im still stuck at 400mhz max.
Hopefully ram will fix this tomorrow .
![]()
Bencher/Gamer(1) 4930K - Asus R4E - 2x R9 290x - G.skill Pi 2200c7 or Team 2400LV 4x4GB - EK Supreme HF - SR1-420 - Qnix 2560x1440
Netbox AMD 5600K - Gigabyte mitx - Aten DVI/USB/120Hz KVM
PB 1xTitan=16453(3D11), 1xGTX680=13343(3D11), 1x GTX580=8733(3D11)38000(3D06) 1x7970=12059(3D11)40000(vantage)395k(AM3) Folding for team 24
AUSTRALIAN DRAG RACING http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFsbfEIy3Yw
Last edited by beard; 04-30-2008 at 03:08 PM.
main rig | htpc 3DMV: P8615 3DM06: 19522
Q9450 @ 3.60 (water) | E2140 @ 3.00 (water)
Maximus Formula (nb, sb, mosfets water) | GA-P35C-DS3R (nb, sb water)
Geil Black Dragon 2x2GB PC6400 CL4 (water) | OCZ FlexXLC 2x1GB PC6400 CL4 (water)
PowerColor 3870 X2 gddr3 (water) | Sapphire 3450 512MB gddr2 (water)
WD Raptor 36GB x2 Raid0, Samsung 500GB (all water) | Samsung 160GB x2 Raid0, Seagate 300GB (all water)
Seasonic S12 600W | Corsair HX 520W
ViewSonic 27.5" | Panasonic 42"
Vista64 SP1 | XP SP3
So seems that fix for 45nm clocking on x38/48 is FUD?
Overclocking limitations of X38/48 chipsets with 45nm Penryn chips (X3350, Q9450) especially of the Asus variety have a really hard time breaking 440FSB.
It was said that Asus was working on this issue according to a Dutch forum, and someone who had contacted Asus BIOS Engineers to figure out the problem.
Nothing has been seen of this since about 2 weeks ago.
My FSB has no problem breaking 440MHz, but my E8400 isn't a very good one because past 3.4 or 3.5GHz, it needs 1.36V or more to stay stable...which is more than I want to feed it 24/7. If they do release a BIOS that let's me drop my vcore that would be awesome, but I'm pretty happy with 3.4GHz @ 1.3Vcore.
Anyway I just got my GSkill 2x2GB PC8000 kit and I'm beginning to mess around. It would not boot at 800MHz 4-4-4-12 2.1V, but it will at 2.14V. That's in the motherboard, I'm going to measure with a multimeter tomorrow because I don't want to feed too much past the rated 2.1V. The bad performance at 800MHz leads me to believe that maybe it won't boot at the rated 5-5-5-15 1000MHz, if so then I will RMA the pair.
I just did some brief benchmarks in Everest...at 780MHz 4-4-4-12 my latency is 66ns. At 800MHz 4-4-4-12 my latency is 72ns. I haven't messed with the subtimings yet, but if I'm stable overnight at 4-4-4-12 800MHz (and they actually boot at the rated speed tomorrow) I will begin messing with the subtimings.
I hope that I can find some settings around 420MHz FSB (x8 multi) with latency at or under 66ns. Those would be my ideal 24/7 settings.
EDIT: I still would like to know two things...1.) is the vdroop mod reversible if I don't like it....2.) where the heck do you measure vcore with a multimeter??? CPU-Z is reading that my voltage fluctuates by up to 16mV under load. It could be more, I think the smallest change it registers is 8mV. This seems like a lot to me...
Last edited by panfist; 04-30-2008 at 08:41 PM.
I probably should have been more specific..... they dont do well at all when clocking a quadcore 45nm.... thats where the 440FSB comes in, and I highly doubt its the chip as almost everyone has run into the same problem.
@Tony - Awesome info man, think you could explain a little what exactly the channel clock skew option does?
Bookmarks