MMM
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Windows XP reg tweak for better Barton performance

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    78

    Windows XP reg tweak for better Barton performance

    Just read this on another forum, anyone know if it actually has any benefit?

    "I found this bit of info on one of the news groups.
    Apparently W*ndows XP by default does not recognize the barton has 512k l2 cache so here is a registry tweak to fix that (?)
    I've just tried it with Aquamark3 and my cpu score increased by 100.
    Some of you barton guys give it a go and let us know your results to see if it's good or just more hot air.

    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Contro l\SessionManager\MemoryManagement.
    Find the DWORD entry: SecondLevelDataCache. If entering it as hexadecimal 256KB = 100 and 512KB = 200 in hexadecimal, and so on."

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    There is no spoon
    Posts
    76
    Hey that does work! I got 213marks in 3Dmark
    Rig 1: Gaming Rig
    Mobile Barton 2400+ 0343 (O/C to 2.48ghz @ 1.90v (11.0x225)
    947-U lapped w/95cfm fan, AS Ceramique/ Silver3 mix
    Abit NF-7 v2.0 nForce2 400 Ultra BIOS 1.6
    Buffalo PC-3700 2x256mb(winbond BH-5ns) 2.0-2-2-11 @2.9v
    WD 80gb SE 7200/100
    Maxtor 20gb 7200/100
    ATI Radeon 9600Pro (500/660)
    Cable (3.0mb/256mb)
    Memtest,Prime95,3Dmark,Toast stable

    Rig 2: Family
    Athlon T-Bred 1700+ (O/C to 1.66ghz)
    12.5x133 @1.6v w/AX-7 53cfm lapped
    Shuttle AK31 KT-266 v2.0
    Winbond PC-2700 CL2 384mb
    IBM 120GXP 60gb 7200/100
    ATI Radeon 8500LE (310/600)
    Cable (3.0mb/256mb)

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    78
    Nice to know, simple easy and FREE!!! and it gives a bit of a performance boost.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Somewhere I Belong
    Posts
    548
    Originally posted by OCmatrix
    Hey that does work! I got 213marks in 3Dmark

    Are you sure?

    I tried this a long time ago

    There was no difference. I gathered that i saw no difference because this L2 cache setting is just there for compatiblity purposes. Like used for older systems, where the CPU had their external L2 cache on the motherboard. So changing this setting in systems with modern CPUs would have no effect on the performance of the system.
    Last edited by Drisler; 12-13-2003 at 10:31 AM.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    307
    Originally posted by Drisler
    Are you sure?

    I tried this a long time ago

    There was no difference. I gathered that i saw no difference because this L2 cache setting is just there for compatiblity purposes. Like used for older systems, where the CPU had their external L2 cache on the motherboard. So changing this setting in systems with modern CPUs would have no effect on the performance of the system.
    ditto

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Canada, eh?
    Posts
    464
    This setting can also be changed in the x-teq x-setup. Here is what it says regarding this setting:

    Windows NT/2K/XP's L2 Cache size is optimized for 256K. Newer computer's L2 caches commonly exceed 256K . Use this plugin if L2 cache size exceeds 256K.

    Enter your system's L2 Cache as a number, e.g. 512K cache should be entered as "512" [no quotes].

    Be sure you do *not* set the value to more L2 cache than you actually have installed. To determine the amount of L2 cache you have installed, check with your vendor, computer's documentation, or watch the BIOS screen when you boot up your machine as the L2 cache amount is usually displayed during this time as well.

    NOTE: Level 2 (L2) CPU cache size can be sized this way, ONLY IF using earlier CPUs: Intel (and compatibles) 386, 486, Pentium, Pentium Pro, AMD K5/K6/K7, Cyrix, etc, with off-chip L2 cache SRAM memory (external, off the CPU die).

    If using newer CPUs: Intel Pentium II/III/IV/Celeron/Xeon, AMD Athlon/Duron/Thunderbird, etc, with on-chip L2 cache SRAM memory (internal, on the CPU die), L2 cache size can *NOT* be altered!


    So this does nothing for a Barton.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    307
    Originally posted by G|-|oST

    So this does nothing for a Barton.
    Nonetheless I set that setting to 512 to get placebo effect

  8. #8
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Somewhere I Belong
    Posts
    548
    Originally posted by Iolao
    Nonetheless I set that setting to 512 to get placebo effect
    Me too..

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •