Results 1 to 25 of 882

Thread: Innovation Cooling's Diamond 7 TIM test results

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    290
    Quote Originally Posted by SiGfever View Post
    Remember that FuZions are "convex" which will force out TIM.
    I assume the convex feature is a product of the casting? This was a problem I had when I was trying to source boilers for our thermosyphon I could not get a sample that was not convex so I changed manufacturing methods rather than go to an extra sanding process.

    If what Intel says is true that you need 43lbs to make the IHS "flat" this feature would tend to minimize edge contact leaving a contact spot in the center of the IHS instead. This on an initial basis with the light contact in littleowl's post (243) with the pressure film fuzion test, does not seem to be happening - high contact at the edges and much less contact on center with a biased pressure on the right side.

    If the convex design is one of intent, you have to help me here as I am not seeing the advantage

  2. #2
    Hamster Powered
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Virginia, USA [Krunching since 2001]
    Posts
    7,623
    Quote Originally Posted by tastymannatees View Post
    I assume the convex feature is a product of the casting? This was a problem I had when I was trying to source boilers for our thermosyphon I could not get a sample that was not convex so I changed manufacturing methods rather than go to an extra sanding process.

    If what Intel says is true that you need 43lbs to make the IHS "flat" this feature would tend to minimize edge contact leaving a contact spot in the center of the IHS instead. This on an initial basis with the light contact in littleowl's post (243) with the pressure film fuzion test, does not seem to be happening - high contact at the edges and much less contact on center with a biased pressure on the right side.

    If the convex design is one of intent, you have to help me here as I am not seeing the advantage
    Because a lot of IHS are bowed they started making the better waterblocks convex to overcome this.
    Last edited by SiGfever; 04-20-2008 at 06:30 PM. Reason: Changed "concave" to "bowed".
    XSWCG Disclaimer:
    We are not responsible for the large sums of money that you WILL want to spend to upgrade and add additional equipment. This is an addiction and the forum takes no responsibility morally or financially for the equipment and therapy cost. Thank you and have a great day.

    Sigmund Freud said... "Failure to CRUNCH is a sign of Sexual Inadequacies".

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    290
    Quote Originally Posted by SiGfever View Post
    Because a lot of IHS are concave they started making the better waterblocks convex to overcome this.

    It just does not make sense to me, well mechanically anyway. If you are not on center you have a problem, if IHS and sink have different diameters, sizes, depths not to mention what happens between the IHS and die....I'll have to pick up a couple and run a dial indicator on them along with some pressure film to see what's going on. Maybe I am getting a little thick in my old age.

  4. #4
    Hamster Powered
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Virginia, USA [Krunching since 2001]
    Posts
    7,623
    Quote Originally Posted by tastymannatees View Post
    It just does not make sense to me, well mechanically anyway. If you are not on center you have a problem, if IHS and sink have different diameters, sizes, depths not to mention what happens between the IHS and die....I'll have to pick up a couple and run a dial indicator on them along with some pressure film to see what's going on. Maybe I am getting a little thick in my old age.
    Here is some good reading...

    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&highlight=ihs

    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&highlight=ihs
    Last edited by SiGfever; 04-20-2008 at 06:20 PM.
    XSWCG Disclaimer:
    We are not responsible for the large sums of money that you WILL want to spend to upgrade and add additional equipment. This is an addiction and the forum takes no responsibility morally or financially for the equipment and therapy cost. Thank you and have a great day.

    Sigmund Freud said... "Failure to CRUNCH is a sign of Sexual Inadequacies".

  5. #5
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    BFE
    Posts
    4,432

    but the fuzion is not convex untill you put in a bigger O ring!?



  6. #6
    Hamster Powered
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Virginia, USA [Krunching since 2001]
    Posts
    7,623
    Quote Originally Posted by littleowl View Post
    but the fuzion is not convex untill you put in a bigger O ring!?
    Yes it has a slight convex shape, the o-ring just bows it more.
    XSWCG Disclaimer:
    We are not responsible for the large sums of money that you WILL want to spend to upgrade and add additional equipment. This is an addiction and the forum takes no responsibility morally or financially for the equipment and therapy cost. Thank you and have a great day.

    Sigmund Freud said... "Failure to CRUNCH is a sign of Sexual Inadequacies".

  7. #7
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    BFE
    Posts
    4,432
    Quote Originally Posted by SiGfever View Post
    Yes it has a slight convex shape, the o-ring just bows it more.
    really? I was under the impreasion that the fuzion was flat unless you put the O ring to convex it. I will have to do some looking at mine when I get the time to do the next set of tests.



  8. #8
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    290

    Ok, I have the concept down, essentially you are putting the same amount of force, overall increasing the psi in a smaller area over the die. It is quite clear in the grease pattern a single broad line down the middle with a thicker coat on either side. Looks like it would be tricky to get it right.

    The paste has hit the bondline as you can see the IHS through it.


    Looking at Martijn's post with the stock Intel cooler it looks like to me that intel does the same type of thing. Smaller available contact area higher pressure. I think that locating the contact area inside of the IHS edge is key to capitalizing on performance. The top will flex, the edges will not as much due to the reinforcing bend on the edges.

    I bet you could make a better water block by just mimicking Intel's base contact

    It will be interesting to see what the pressure film kicks out of all this.
    Last edited by tastymannatees; 04-20-2008 at 10:37 PM.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •