#2 E8500 Q748A212 + Commando under 8" but...

[DonBanana]

Is there really an OVP on the Commando? This is the first time i´ve heared about it. No chance to avoid it with VDroop Mod?

[c1rcu1tburn3r]

You're right, i know...maybe is my vdrop trimmer that have somethings...i'll try it with ma multimeter
On my other commando i can go more than 2v without problems... i'll try when i'll load my dewar again...2 or 3 days

[OC_Windforce]

You're right, i know...maybe is my vdrop trimmer that have somethings...i'll try it with ma multimeter
On my other commando i can go more than 2v without problems... i'll try when i'll load my dewar again...2 or 3 days

The cause is because the vcore trimmer value is high in the OVP.
The resistance value which is set raise.


In my case set about 9.8Kohm

ex) Bios set 1.75V + vcore trimmer(9.8Kohm) = 1.984V

[c1rcu1tburn3r]

Also this evening i tried different settings but mobo goes under ovp around 1.93 i seen also 1.95 but only for 5 or 6 seconds just in time to see 5918Mhz not validated and mobo turned off and was impossible start it again, on off on off on off damn protection

[dinos22]

huh

mig21 what's up with the timings there man

how did you do an OVP mod??

i got a sweet board as well....628MHz FSB screen on air cooling with E8500....i won't need more than 1.9v for 6Ghz but problem is hotness of this CPU ..........if this second board i have can also manage -140C i should be ok for 6GHz otherwise probably not

[c1rcu1tburn3r]

I'm out of head...give me some ovp for commando! This's an order!

[mig21]

Wtf...great cpu-z! But i can't understand how you achieved only 8" at 5900+ Mhz!!!

I think it because I didn't tweak the windows + no use JP Pmem strap.

huh

mig21 what's up with the timings there man

how did you do an OVP mod??

i got a sweet board as well....628MHz FSB screen on air cooling with E8500....i won't need more than 1.9v for 6Ghz but problem is hotness of this CPU ..........if this second board i have can also manage -140C i should be ok for 6GHz otherwise probably not

May be it was a ram bug but I think it would be higher (ram bug too),you can see it through my valid link

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=299168

I ll show you as soon as I can,I get very busy due to full time job and a baby