MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 882

Thread: Innovation Cooling's Diamond 7 TIM test results

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    BFE
    Posts
    4,432
    yeah tasty I looked at the color chart but still not really sure what to make of it other then my 6002 has a hell of a lot harder clamp then my fuzion.

    looking at your charts (more then I got with my free sample kit) my humidity was D 60%
    looking at color my PSI would be about 80 because my chart for the fuzion shows it at about .5??? sound right??



  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    290
    Quote Originally Posted by littleowl View Post
    yeah tasty I looked at the color chart but still not really sure what to make of it other then my 6002 has a hell of a lot harder clamp then my fuzion.

    looking at your charts (more then I got with my free sample kit) my humidity was D 60%
    looking at color my PSI would be about 80 because my chart for the fuzion shows it at about .5??? sound right??
    This is the reason I opted for the full digital analysis. The white Areas are where you are not making any contact. You have to do a kind of mental averaging I would agree on the 80PSI reading in the darker areas although about 1/4 looks to be < 30psi so the 80 would drop with the digital analysis.

    The first image has most of the pressure reading at the edges little or no contact in the center so something,... IHS? is a little on the concave side and looks to me < 30PSI in that center part.

    The mounts both look like the have a higher pressure on the right side than on the left.

    Like I said it is subjective and why I would like to put together a library with raw and digtital pics 50 or 60 samples probably will cover most variations in mounts.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    BFE
    Posts
    4,432
    Quote Originally Posted by tastymannatees View Post
    This is the reason I opted for the full digital analysis. The white Areas are where you are not making any contact. You have to do a kind of mental averaging I would agree on the 80PSI reading in the darker areas although about 1/4 looks to be < 30psi so the 80 would drop with the digital analysis.

    The first image has most of the pressure reading at the edges little or no contact in the center so something,... IHS? is a little on the concave side and looks to me < 30PSI in that center part.

    The mounts both look like the have a higher pressure on the right side than on the left.

    Like I said it is subjective and why I would like to put together a library with raw and digtital pics 50 or 60 samples probably will cover most variations in mounts.
    well this was there free sample SPI sent me and when I get yours I will do it on the bench top and see what the different mounts look like. after I get them I will label each of them before i scan this time! I did send my samples back in today so I am excited to see what they tell me.



  4. #4
    version 2.0
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Flanders
    Posts
    3,862
    Tried the IC diamond compound today. (Thanks to David_L6 ). Must say i'm pretty impressed

    My 'razor blade' style method didn't work very well . I'm using the 'blob' method now. Also the mount of my TRUE wasn't optimal. I've put an old credit card under the metal bracket. Seems to work better , gives more downforce.

    Sorry, don't have very reliable scientific data here , but I'm seeing a solid 5&#176;C degree drop in coretemp But you gotta factor in the better TRUE mount and better TIM method.

    Q6600 B3 @ 3.4Ghz 1.45vcore
    TRUE + 1500rpm Antec fan
    Asus P5Ke Wifi

    before 72-72-68-69 (23&#176; ambient)
    now 67-67-63-63 (23&#176;C ambient)
    Last edited by Jaco; 04-19-2008 at 07:09 AM.

  5. #5
    Mr. Boardburner
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    the Netherlands
    Posts
    5,340
    The testing system:

    CPU: P4 630 @ 3.6Ghz, 1.35v in BIOS, 1.37v measured.
    Mobo: Asus P5AD2-E premium
    Mem: Some crappy 2x512MB sticks I still had. DDR2-533.
    GPU: ATI Radeon HD2400pro
    HD: Seagate 7200.7 80GB SATA (not in the picture)
    TIM: Arctic Silver 5


    Original AS5:


    The cooler mounted. This is a stock Conroe-L/Wolfdale heatsink.


    The system as it is running right now. Yes, that is my trusty old Matrox Mystique PCI laying there.


    The cooler after removal:


    The CPU after removal of the cooler. It didn't have proper contact, after a remount temperatures were better.


    Updated temperatures from an improved mount:

    Temperatures:
    Idle: 50C
    Load: 70C
    Ambient: 22C


    More ICD7 results up tomorrow. So far the temperatures are 44C idle, 65C load with a 20C ambient.


    Update:

    ICD7 on the CPU:


    The cooler after removal:


    The CPU after removal of the cooler:



    The final ICD7 results:

    Ambient 19C
    Idle: 41C
    Load: 62C


    That is a 6 degree drop in idle temp, and a 5 degree drop in load temp.


    EDIT:
    I had a quick chat with Andrew over PM. He asked me to post this since I noticed this while mounting my heatsink. The stock Intel heatsink, as we all know, uses push-pins to tighten the cooler to the board. Obviously, no motherboard is perfect. One of these small manufacturing errors can mean that the board has slightly larger mounting holes, or mounting holes that are slightly off-center. From time to time I have seen boards that are bent around the CPU area, obviously because the cooler applied a lot of pressure on the board. This can either be a cooler or a motherboard manufacturing error.
    When mounting the stock Intel cooler on this P5AD2-E board, it took me much, much longer to mount than on my Striker Extreme (say 5 minutes vs. 1). On the P5AD2-E mobo, it seems the cooler is much more firmly attached than it was on my Striker Extreme. From the looks of it, it seems the mounting holes on the Striker are slightly bigger as well. Also, when using push-pins rather than a backplate, it could be that the cooler isn't touching the CPU perfectly, something which is less of an issue when using a backplate. This can result in different load temperatures.
    Last edited by Martijn; 04-19-2008 at 12:03 PM.
    Main rig:
    CPU: I7 920C0 @ 3.6Ghz (180*20)
    Mobo: DFI UT X58 T3eH8
    RAM: 12GB OCZ DDR3-1600 Platinum
    GPU/LCD: GeForce GTX280 + GeForce 8600GTS (Quad LCDs)
    Intel X25-M G2 80GB, 12TB storage
    PSU/Case: Corsair AX850, Silverstone TJ07

  6. #6
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    290
    I had a quick chat with Andrew over PM. He asked me to post this since I noticed this while mounting my heatsink. The stock Intel heatsink, as we all know, uses push-pins to tighten the cooler to the board. Obviously, no motherboard is perfect. One of these small manufacturing errors can mean that the board has slightly larger mounting holes, or mounting holes that are slightly off-center. From time to time I have seen boards that are bent around the CPU area, obviously because the cooler applied a lot of pressure on the board. This can either be a cooler or a motherboard manufacturing error.
    When mounting the stock Intel cooler on this P5AD2-E board, it took me much, much longer to mount than on my Striker Extreme (say 5 minutes vs. 1). On the P5AD2-E mobo, it seems the cooler is much more firmly attached than it was on my Striker Extreme. From the looks of it, it seems the mounting holes on the Striker are slightly bigger as well. Also, when using push-pins rather than a backplate, it could be that the cooler isn't touching the CPU perfectly, something which is less of an issue when using a backplate. This can result in different load temperatures.
    __________________

    This was a great observation by Martijn. I Have not been getting great results with push pin configurations on the whole, usually equal or +1 or 2C which I was attributing to low mounting pressure due to hardware fatigue and other factors and never relating it to MB mechanical differences that was causing a pressure issue. Something to take note of and see if we can get further confirmation.

    This is the kind of stuff that we can use in our troubleshooting guide. You Guys are doing great work, above and beyond what I expected. I'll have to work out a (modest) bonus for the group when we get to completion.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Tampa
    Posts
    1,056
    Quote Originally Posted by tastymannatees View Post
    This was a great observation by Martijn. I Have not been getting great results with push pin configurations on the whole, usually equal or +1 or 2C which I was attributing to low mounting pressure due to hardware fatigue and other factors and never relating it to MB mechanical differences that was causing a pressure issue. Something to take note of and see if we can get further confirmation.

    This is the kind of stuff that we can use in our troubleshooting guide. You Guys are doing great work, above and beyond what I expected. I'll have to work out a (modest) bonus for the group when we get to completion.
    If you are looking for better mounting pressure with the stock intel coolers with the LGA775 push-pins you can get one of those Thermalright LGA775 bolt-through kits.
    Workstation :
    Q6600 @ 3.2ghz/Scythe Infinity (Screw mount mod)
    GA-P35-DS3L (F7)
    4GB G.Skill @ 400mhz 4-4-4-12
    BFG Nvidia 7600gt
    WD 250GB SATAII 16MB (OS/Programs)
    Seagate 250GB SATAII 16MB (Storage)
    NEC DVD+/-RW
    Antec NeoHE 550W
    X-Fi Xtreme Music
    Razer Copperhead
    MS Natural Ergonomic 4000 (Best KB ever!)
    Windows 2008 Enterprise Server x64

    Laptop:
    Dell Latitude D610 - Pentium M 750 1.86Ghz / 1GB RAM

  8. #8
    Hamster Powered
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Virginia, USA [Krunching since 2001]
    Posts
    7,623
    Two Week Cure:

    I had posted my Final Results after one week of cure time but I find this interesting that my temps are degrading.

    Ambient = 22.7c


    Idle:
    Core 0: 34
    Core 1: 34
    Core 2: 32
    Core 3: 31

    Load:
    Core 0: 45
    Core 1: 45
    Core 2: 46
    Core 3: 44


    I am going to pull the mount, inspect, and reapply TIM according to coverage pattern.







    I am wondering if I have too much pressure forcing your TIM off the mount? I will remount using the kit that came with the FuZion which has "limiters" in the springs to prevent over tightening. I will re-run for one week to test.
    Last edited by SiGfever; 04-20-2008 at 12:20 PM.
    XSWCG Disclaimer:
    We are not responsible for the large sums of money that you WILL want to spend to upgrade and add additional equipment. This is an addiction and the forum takes no responsibility morally or financially for the equipment and therapy cost. Thank you and have a great day.

    Sigmund Freud said... "Failure to CRUNCH is a sign of Sexual Inadequacies".

  9. #9
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    1,039

    Thumbs up

    Here's one that I ran three times (yes, 3 times! That's why it has taken me so long to get these results) because I didn't believe the results the first time. This Diamond 7 is a very good TIM.


    Q6600 @ 3.4GHz with a Zalman 9700 heatsink.

    with AS5

    59, 58, 58, 53

    with Diamond 7

    54, 54, 54, 49
    Last edited by David_L6; 04-20-2008 at 11:40 AM.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •